AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (7.3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Paper | Open Access

Gas liquid cylindrical cyclone flow regime identification using machine learning combined with experimental mechanism explanation

Zhao-Ming Yanga, Yu-Xuan Hea, Qi Xianga, Enrico Ziob,c, Li-Min Hed, Xiao-Ming Luod, Huai Sua( ), Ji Wanga, Jin-Jun Zhanga( )
National Engineering Laboratory for Pipeline Safety/MOE Key Laboratory of Petroleum Engineering/Beijing Key Laboratory of Urban Oil and Gas Distribution Technology, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, 102249, Beijing, China
MINES ParisTech, PSL Research University, CRC, Sophia Antipolis, France
Dipartimento di Energia, Politecnico di Milano, Via La Masa 34, 20156, Milano, Italy
College of Pipeline and Civil Engineering, China University of Petroleum-East China, 266580, Qingdao, China

Edited by Xiu-Qiu Peng

Show Author Information

Abstract

The flow regimes of GLCC with horizon inlet and a vertical pipe are investigated in experiments, and the velocities and pressure drops data labeled by the corresponding flow regimes are collected. Combined with the flow regimes data of other GLCC positions from other literatures in existence, the gas and liquid superficial velocities and pressure drops are used as the input of the machine learning algorithms respectively which are applied to identify the flow regimes. The choosing of input data types takes the availability of data for practical industry fields into consideration, and the twelve machine learning algorithms are chosen from the classical and popular algorithms in the area of classification, including the typical ensemble models, SVM, KNN, Bayesian Model and MLP. The results of flow regimes identification show that gas and liquid superficial velocities are the ideal type of input data for the flow regimes identification by machine learning. Most of the ensemble models can identify the flow regimes of GLCC by gas and liquid velocities with the accuracy of 0.99 and more. For the pressure drops as the input of each algorithm, it is not the suitable as gas and liquid velocities, and only XGBoost and Bagging Tree can identify the GLCC flow regimes accurately. The success and confusion of each algorithm are analyzed and explained based on the experimental phenomena of flow regimes evolution processes, the flow regimes map, and the principles of algorithms. The applicability and feasibility of each algorithm according to different types of data for GLCC flow regimes identification are proposed.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Petroleum Science
Pages 540-558

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Yang Z-M, He Y-X, Xiang Q, et al. Gas liquid cylindrical cyclone flow regime identification using machine learning combined with experimental mechanism explanation. Petroleum Science, 2023, 20(1): 540-558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2022.09.005

479

Views

1

Downloads

12

Crossref

10

Web of Science

9

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 10 May 2022
Revised: 13 September 2022
Accepted: 14 September 2022
Published: 04 October 2022
© 2022 The Authors.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).