AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.3 MB)
Collect
AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Article | Open Access

Efficacy and safety of the Chinese herbal formula Guominkang for allergic rhinitis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Juntong Liua,b,1Haiyun Zhangb,c,1Longmei Yua,bHonglei Zhanga,bLinhan Hua,bYihang Zhanga,dYumei ZhouaJi Wanga( )Qi Wanga
National Institute of TCM Constitution and Preventive Treatment of Disease, Wangqi Academy of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China
School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 102488, China
Affiliated Nantong Hospital of Shanghai University, The Sixth People's Hospital of Nantong, Nantong 226000, China
The Second Clinical Medical College, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou 450046, China

1 These authors have contributed equally to this work.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Guominkang (GMK) for allergic rhinitis (AR).

Methods

A total of 130 patients with AR aged 18–60 were randomized 1:1 to the GMK or placebo groups for 8 weeks of treatment. Assessments were conducted every 4 weeks, followed by follow-up visits every 8 weeks during the 24-week follow-up period. The primary outcome was the change in total nasal symptom score (TNSS). Secondary outcome measures included related symptom scores, quality of life assessments, mental health scales and laboratory test results.

Results

A total of 110 of the 130 participants completed the study at the Sixth People's Hospital of Nantong City, Nantong, China, between February and December 2023. After 8 weeks of treatment, the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis showed a greater reduction in TNSS in the GMK group, with a score change of 9.00 (7.00, 10.00) and a difference (95% confidence interval [CI]) of − 9.00 (− 9.00 to − 8.00; P < .001). Consistent findings were confirmed in the per-protocol (PP) analysis, with a score change: 8.63 (2.37) and a difference (95% CI) of − 8.68 (− 9.51 to − 7.85; P < .001). The GMK group also showed marked improvements in total nasal and non-nasal symptom score (TNNSS), rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire (RQLQ) scores and 36-item short form health survey (SF-36) (P < .001). Only Weed Pollen (wx5) showed a significant group–time interaction (P = .037). No serious adverse events or abnormal laboratory findings were observed.

Conclusion

GMK effectively relieves symptoms and improves quality of life of patients with AR. However, larger and longer-term trials are needed to further verify its efficacy and safety.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Traditional Chinese Medical Sciences
Pages 337-348

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Liu J, Zhang H, Yu L, et al. Efficacy and safety of the Chinese herbal formula Guominkang for allergic rhinitis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medical Sciences, 2026, 13(3): 337-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcms.2026.06.006

13

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Scopus

Received: 27 December 2025
Revised: 12 June 2026
Accepted: 14 June 2026
Published: 19 June 2026
© 2026 Beijing University of Chinese Medicine.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).