AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (2 MB)
Collect
AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Special Topic | Open Access

Thoughts on the scientific research of the connotation of traditional Chinese medicine patterns

Kang Xiea,bYulin Ouyanga,bYong Wangc,d,eChun Lia,b,d,e,f( )
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510006, China
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Syndrome and Formula, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510006, China
Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China
School of Traditional Chinese, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 102488, China
Beijing Key Laboratory of TCM Syndrome and Formula, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China
State Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510006, China

Peer review under responsibility of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is a holistic medical system that classifies and treats diseases based on the concept of patterns. These patterns describe the pathophysiological process of a disease at a specific stage, reflecting both external signs and internal features. TCM patterns are central to pattern differentiation, treatment, clinical practice, and theoretical development in TCM. However, scientific explanation of TCM patterns remains limited because of subjective diagnostic criteria, the absence of a standardized experimental medical system, and unclear biological mechanisms, which restrict the modernization and globalization of TCM. Addressing challenges such as strong subjectivity in diagnosis, lack of standardized experimental systems, and unclear biological mechanisms is necessary to clarify the scientific meaning of TCM patterns and to provide technical approaches for the modernization and globalization of TCM. A strategy focused on “pathogenic factors, genetic predisposition, and disease progression stages” was adopted. This approach included the following: (Ⅰ) constructing disease-pattern integrated biological models with animal models, organoids, and multi-organ chips; (Ⅱ) applying multi-omics technologies, such as spatial omics, single-cell omics, and dynamic metabolic flux omics; (Ⅲ) using artificial intelligence (AI) and big data for data integration and prediction of pattern evolution; and (Ⅳ) validating formula–pattern associations through the “pattern differentiation through formula efficacy” approach. These strategies directly address the main obstacles in TCM pattern research by providing objective, quantifiable, and reproducible methodologies. Constructing disease-pattern integrated models enabled cross-scale research platforms. Applying multi-omics technologies allowed analysis of complex biological bases. AI and big data approaches addressed challenges related to heterogeneous data. The “formula-based pattern differentiation” approach supported precise interventions and the development of new drugs. This interdisciplinary framework advances TCM pattern research by moving from empirical description to objective quantification. By integrating innovative approaches, the study establishes a foundation for systematic, evidence-based TCM diagnosis and treatment, supporting accuracy and promoting international recognition and modernization of TCM. The study shows that combining multi-omics technologies, AI-driven data analysis, and disease-pattern models enables objective quantification of TCM patterns and clarifies their biological mechanisms.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Traditional Chinese Medical Sciences
Pages 3-11

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Xie K, Ouyang Y, Wang Y, et al. Thoughts on the scientific research of the connotation of traditional Chinese medicine patterns. Journal of Traditional Chinese Medical Sciences, 2026, 13(1): 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcms.2025.12.004

672

Views

4

Downloads

1

Crossref

0

Scopus

Received: 11 November 2025
Revised: 07 December 2025
Accepted: 08 December 2025
Published: 12 December 2025
© 2025 Beijing University of Chinese Medicine.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).