AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review | Open Access

Ischemic stroke treatment by vagus nerve stimulation: A comprehensive review of mechanisms, clinical efficacy, and future directions

Penglang Fana,1, Chao Wub,1, Bin Liub( )
Department of Neurosurgery, Peking University Third Hospital Qinhuangdao Hospital, Qinhaungdao 066000, Hebei, China
Department of Neurosurgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100083, China

1 These authors contributed equally to this work.

Show Author Information
An erratum to this article is available online at:

Abstract

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has emerged as a promising neuromodulatory therapy for ischemic stroke that uses multifaceted mechanisms to address acute injury and chronic recovery. This review synthesizes evidence from preclinical and clinical studies, highlighting three neuroprotective mechanisms of VNS: (1) hemodynamic optimization through cholinergic-mediated vasodilation and neurovascular coupling enhancement, (2) suppression of proinflammatory cascades via the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway (e.g., >60% TNF-α reduction in animal models), and (3) facilitation of neuroplasticity via brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) upregulation and reorganization of neural networks. Preclinical studies have demonstrated robust efficacy, including 38% infarct reduction in rodent models, whereas clinical trials have found heterogeneous outcomes, with 65%–82% of patients achieving functional improvement, underscoring the need for personalized protocols. Technological advancements are pivotal: noninvasive transcutaneous VNS (tVNS) offers safer alternatives to comparable acute-phase efficacy, and closed-loop systems integrating electroencephalography (EEG), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and biomarker feedback reduce adverse effects by 37% through adaptive parameter optimization. However, translational challenges persist, including interspecies pathophysiological disparities, trial design heterogeneity, and long-term safety concerns (e.g., 28%–33% incidence of neural adaptation in chronic invasive VNS). Future directions emphasize humanized stroke models, multimodal data integration, and cost-effective tVNS deployment to improve accessibility. This review delineates a roadmap for VNS clinical translation by bridging mechanistic insights with engineering innovations, positioning VHS as a transformative adjunct therapy in precision stroke rehabilitation.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Neurorestoratology

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Fan P, Wu C, Liu B. Ischemic stroke treatment by vagus nerve stimulation: A comprehensive review of mechanisms, clinical efficacy, and future directions. Journal of Neurorestoratology, 2025, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnrt.2025.100209

1998

Views

4

Crossref

5

Web of Science

4

Scopus

Received: 01 December 2024
Revised: 03 March 2025
Accepted: 17 March 2025
Published: 01 August 2025
© 2025 The Authors.

This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).