AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Powered by AMiner. Clicking this button will take you away from SciOpen.
Home Journal of Neurorestoratology Article
Article Link
Cite
EndNote(RIS) BibTeX
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review | Open Access

Research progress in the application of motor-cognitive dual-task training in rehabilitation of walking function in stroke patients

Beijing Zhongguancun Hospital/Zhongguancun Hospital, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
Department of Neurosurgery, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100007, China
Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100144, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Restoration of walking ability in stroke patients is the basis for their return to their families and society. Motor-cognitive dual-task training (MCDTT) can effectively strengthen the functional network connection between motor and cognitive brain regions and promote brain functional network remodeling, which is more relevant to daily life than single-task training in improving walking dysfunction of stroke patients and can more effectively train patients' adaptive walking ability. This paper summarizes the application and research progress of MCDTT in post-stroke walking rehabilitation, and aims to provide a theoretical basis for further research on systematic motor-cognitive therapy techniques to promote walking rehabilitation in stroke patients.

Keywords

StrokeRehabilitationMotor-cognitive dual-taskWalking function

References

1

Ding QQ, Liu SW, Yao YD, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of ischemic stroke, 1990-2019. Neurology. 2022;98(3): e279-e290.
Crossref Google Scholar
2

Maenza C, Good DC, Winstein CJ, et al. Functional deficits in the less-impaired arm of stroke survivors depend on hemisphere of damage and extent of paretic arm impairment. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2020;34(1): 39-50.
Crossref Google Scholar
3

Hobbs B, Artemiadis P. A review of robot-assisted lower-limb stroke therapy: unexplored paths and future directions in gait rehabilitation. Front Neurorobot. 2020;14: 19.
Crossref Google Scholar
4

Kim DH, Kang CS, Kyeong S. Robot-assisted gait training promotes brain reorganization after stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2020;46(4): 483-489.
Crossref Google Scholar
5

Takakusaki K. Neurophysiology of gait: from the spinal cord to the frontal lobe. Mov Disord. 2013;28(11): 1483-1491.
Crossref Google Scholar
6

Rose DK, Nadeau SE, Wu SS, et al. Locomotor training and strength and balance exercises for walking recovery after stroke: response to number of training Sessions. Phys Ther. 2017;97(11): 1066-1074.
Crossref Google Scholar
7

Pang MYC, Yang L, Ouyang H, et al. Dual-task exercise reduces cognitive-motor interference in walking and Falls after stroke. Stroke. 2018;49(12): 2990-2998.
Crossref Google Scholar
8

Akin H, Senel A, Taskiran H, et al. Do motor-cognitive and motor-motor dual task training effect differently balance performance in older adults? Eur Geriatr Med. 2021;12(2): 371-378.
Crossref Google Scholar
9

Liu YC, Yang YR, Tsai YA, et al. Cognitive and motor dual task gait training improve dual task gait performance after stroke - a randomized controlled pilot trial. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1): 4070.
Crossref Google Scholar
10

Tsang CSL, Chong DYK, Pang MYC. Cognitive-motor interference in walking after stroke: test-retest reliability and validity of dual-task walking assessments. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33(6): 1066-1078.
Crossref Google Scholar
11

Osuka Y, Kojima N, Sakurai R, et al. Reliability and construct validity of a novel motor-cognitive dual-task test: a Stepping Trail Making Test. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2020;20(4): 291-296.
Crossref Google Scholar
12

Al-Yahya E, Dawes H, Smith L, et al. Cognitive motor interference while walking: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011;35(3): 715-728.
Crossref Google Scholar
13

Plummer P, Eskes G, Wallace S, et al. Cognitive-motor interference during functional mobility after stroke: state of the science and implications for future research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(12): 2565-2574. e6.
Crossref Google Scholar
14

Cockburn J, Haggard P, Cock J, et al. Changing patterns of cognitive-motor interference (CMI) over time during recovery from stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2003;17(2): 167-173.
Crossref Google Scholar
15

Zhang Z, Wang J, Feng J. A neuropsychology review of cognition and postural control (in Chinese). Space Med Med Eng. 2013;26(4): 333-337.
Crossref Google Scholar
16

Hyndman D, Ashburn A, Yardley L, et al. Interference between balance, gait and cognitive task performance among people with stroke living in the community. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(13/14): 849-856.
Crossref Google Scholar
17

Yang J, Wang Y, Wang W. The event-related potentials elicited by spatial location conflict in human brain (in Chinese). Chin J Clin Rrehab. 2002;6(5): 671-672.
Google Scholar
18

Ohzuno T, Usuda S. Cognitive-motor interference in post-stroke individuals and healthy adults under different cognitive load and task prioritization conditions. J Phys Ther Sci. 2019;31(3): 255-260.
Crossref Google Scholar
19

Strobach T. The dual-task practice advantage: empirical evidence and cognitive mechanisms. Psychon Bull Rev. 2020;27(1): 3-14.
Crossref Google Scholar
20

Ghai S, Ghai I, Effenberg AO. Effects of dual tasks and dual-task training on postural stability: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Interv Aging. 2017;12: 557-577.
Crossref Google Scholar
21

Fujita H, Kasubuchi K, Wakata S, et al. Role of the frontal cortex in standing postural sway tasks while dual-tasking: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy study examining working memory capacity. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016: 7053867.
Crossref Google Scholar
22

Bayot M, Dujardin K, Tard C, et al. The interaction between cognition and motor control: a theoretical framework for dual-task interference effects on posture, gait initiation, gait and turning. Clin Neurophysiol. 2018;48(6): 361-375.
Crossref Google Scholar
23

Mitra S, Knight A, Munn A. Divergent effects of cognitive load on quiet stance and task-linked postural coordination. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013;39(2): 323-328.
Crossref Google Scholar
24

Plummer P, Eskes G. Measuring treatment effects on dual-task performan a framework for research and clinical practice. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015;9: 225.
Crossref Google Scholar
25

Silsupadol P, Shumway-Cook A, Lugade V, et al. Effects of single-task versus dual-task training on balance performance in older adults: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(3): 381-387.
Crossref Google Scholar
26

Sengar S, Raghav D, Verma M, et al. Efficacy of dual-task training with two different priorities instructional sets on gait parameters in patients with chronic stroke. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2019;15: 2959-2969.
Crossref Google Scholar
27

Timmermans C, Roerdink M, Janssen TWJ, et al. Dual-task walking in challenging environments in people with stroke: cognitive-motor interference and task prioritization. Stroke Res Treat. 2018;2018: 7928597.
Crossref Google Scholar
28

Choi JH, Kim BR, Han EY, et al. The effect of dual-task training on balance and cognition in patients with subacute post-stroke. Ann Rehabil Med. 2015;39(1): 81-90.
Crossref Google Scholar
29

Rodrigues ACMA, Tinini RCDR, Gatica-Rojas V, et al. Motor-cognitive dual-task performance of older women evaluated using Wii Balance Board. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020;32(5): 907-912.
Crossref Google Scholar
30
Zhuang J. Effect of Cognitive Dual Task Training on Balance Ability after Stroke. Master's Thesis. Shanghai, China: Shanghai Institute of Physical Education; 2017.
31

Lee IW, Kim YN, Lee DK. Effect of a virtual reality exercise program accompanied by cognitive tasks on the balance and gait of stroke patients. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(7): 2175-2177.
Crossref Google Scholar
32

An HJ, Kim JI, Kim YR, et al. The effect of various dual task training methods with gait on the balance and gait of patients with chronic stroke. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014;26(8): 1287-1291.
Crossref Google Scholar
33

Norouzi E, Vaezmosavi M, Gerber M, et al. Dual-task training on cognition and resistance training improved both balance and working memory in older people. Phys Sportsmed. 2019;47(4): 471-478.
Crossref Google Scholar
34

Paolucci T, Capobianco SV, Vinciguerra SM, et al. A novel neurocognitive rehabilitation tool in the recovery of hemiplegic hand grip after stroke: a case report. Funct Neurol. 2019;34(1): 53-57.
Google Scholar
35
Wang J. Effects of Dual Task Walking Training on Motor and Cognitive Functions of Stroke Patients. Master's Thesis. Tangshan, Hebei, China: North China University of Science and Technology; 2021.
36

Hermand E, Tapie B, Dupuy O, et al. Prefrontal cortex activation during dual task with increasing cognitive load in subacute stroke patients: a pilot study. Front Aging Neurosci. 2019;11: 160.
Crossref Google Scholar
37

Merchant RA, Chan YH, Hui RJY, et al. Possible sarcopenia and impact of dual-task exercise on gait speed, handgrip strength, Falls, and perceived health. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8: 660463.
Crossref Google Scholar
38

Meester D, Al-Yahya E, Dennis A, et al. A randomized controlled trial of a walking training with simultaneous cognitive demand (dual-task) in chronic stroke. Eur J Neurol. 2019;26(3): 435-441.
Crossref Google Scholar
39

Lee KB, Lim SH, Ko EH, et al. Factors related to community ambulation in patients with chronic stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2015;22(1): 63-71.
Crossref Google Scholar
40

Yan R, Zhang Y, Lim J, et al. The effect and biomechanical mechanisms of intradermal needle for post-stroke hemiplegia recovery: study protocol for a randomized controlled pilot trial. Medicine: Baltimore. 2018;97(16): e0448.
Crossref Google Scholar
41

Pellecchia GL. Dual-task training reduces impact of cognitive task on postural sway. J Mot Behav. 2005;37(3): 239-246.
Crossref Google Scholar
42

Wang CY, Wang GD, Lu AM, et al. Effects of attentional control on gait and inter-joint coordination during dual-task walking. Front Psychol. 2021;12: 665175.
Crossref Google Scholar
43

Wollesen B, Schulz S, Seydell L, et al. Does dual task training improve walking performance of older adults with concern of falling? BMC Geriatr. 2017;17(1): 213.
Crossref Google Scholar
44

Plummer-D'Amato P, Kyvelidou A, Sternad D, et al. Training dual-task walking in community-dwelling adults within 1 year of stroke: a protocol for a single-blind randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurol. 2012;12: 129.
Crossref Google Scholar
45

Wang XQ, Pi YL, Chen BL, et al. Cognitive motor interference for gait and balance in stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Neurol. 2015;22(3): 555-e37.
Crossref Google Scholar
46

Kim H, Choi W, Lee K, et al. Virtual dual-task treadmill training using video recording for gait of chronic stroke survivors: a randomized controlled trial. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(12): 3693-3697.
Crossref Google Scholar
47

Iqbal M, Arsh A, Hammad SM, et al. Comparison of dual task specific training and conventional physical therapy in ambulation of hemiplegic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Pak Med Assoc. 2020;70(1): 7-10.
Crossref Google Scholar
48

Plummer P, Villalobos RM, Vayda MS, et al. Feasibility of dual-task gait training for community-dwelling adults after stroke: a case series. Stroke Res Treat. 2014;2014: 538602.
Crossref Google Scholar
49

Plummer P, Iyigün G. Effects of physical exercise interventions on dual-task gait speed following stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabilitation. 2018;99(12): 2548-2560.
Crossref Google Scholar
50

Choi W, Lee G, Lee S. Effect of the cognitive-motor dual-task using auditory cue on balance of surviviors with chronic stroke: a pilot study. Clin Rehabil. 2015;29(8): 763-770.
Crossref Google Scholar
51

Broeker L, Liepelt R, Poljac E, et al. Multitasking as a choi a perspective. Psychol Res. 2018;82(1): 12-23.
Crossref Google Scholar
52

Minassian K, Hofstoetter US, Dzeladini F, et al. The human central pattern generator for locomotion: does it exist and contribute to walking? Neuroscientist. 2017;23(6): 649-663.
Crossref Google Scholar
53

Wang DD, Choi JT. Brain network oscillations during gait in Parkinson's disease. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020;14: 568703.
Crossref Google Scholar
54

Caetano MJD, Menant JC, Schoene D, et al. Sensorimotor and cognitive predictors of impaired gait adaptability in older people. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017;72(9): 1257-1263.
Google Scholar
55

Kalron A, Achiron A, Menascu S. Gait variability, not walking speed, is related to cognition in adolescents with multiple sclerosis. J Child Neurol. 2019;34(1): 27-32.
Crossref Google Scholar
56

Erickson KI, Colcombe SJ, Wadhwa R, et al. Training-induced functional activation changes in dual-task processing: an FMRI study. Cereb Cortex. 2007;17(1): 192-204.
Crossref Google Scholar
57

Watanabe K, Funahashi S. Toward an understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying dual-task performan contribution of comparative approaches using animal models. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018;84: 12-28.
Crossref Google Scholar
58

Peters S, Eng JJ, Liu-Ambrose T, et al. Brain activity associated with Dual-task performance of Ankle motor control during cognitive challenge. Brain Behav. 2019;9(8): e01349.
Crossref Google Scholar
Journal of Neurorestoratology
Volume 11 Issue 1,
March 2023
Article number: 100028
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnrt.2022.100028
Cite this article:
Yang Z-Q, Wei M-F, Chen L, et al. Research progress in the application of motor-cognitive dual-task training in rehabilitation of walking function in stroke patients. Journal of Neurorestoratology, 2023, 11(1): 100028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnrt.2022.100028

629

Views

3

Crossref

4

Web of Science

4

Scopus

Altmetrics
Received: 08 August 2022
Revised: 08 October 2022
Accepted: 11 October 2022
Published: 06 November 2022
© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Tsinghua University Press.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Return