AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Comparative analysis of activity trends of sulfur-rich and sulfur-poor electrodeposited amorphous cobalt-based electrocatalysts for alkaline water splitting reactions

Aleksandr A. Kokina,b,1Victoria P. Chertkovac,1Egor I. PoltorykhincPavel A. SinitsynbEduard E. Levinc,dSergey V. Ryazantseva( )Junye Chenga ( )Victoria A. Nikitinab,c( )
Faculty of Materials Science, Shenzhen MSU-BIT University, Shenzhen, 518172, Guangdong, China
Center for Energy Science and Technology, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Nobel Street 3, Moscow, 143026, Russia
Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory 1/3, Moscow, 119991, Russia
FSRC "Crystallography and photonics" of NRC «Kurchatov Institute», Leninsky Prospekt 59, Moscow, 119333, Russia

1 Contributed equally.

Show Author Information

Abstract

The study explores cobalt sulfide electrocatalysts for alkaline water splitting, focusing on the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER). We compare sulfur-rich and sulfur-poor amorphous cobalt-based materials, specifically examining how composition, morphology, and chemical speciation influence catalytic activity and stability under reaction conditions. A key finding is the different transformation behaviors of sulfur-poor and sulfur-rich materials in alkaline environments and their impact on HER and OER performance. The study highlights that the chosen electrodeposition method significantly impacts the composition, morphology, and most importantly, the dynamic surface transformation behavior of cobalt sulfide catalysts, which, in turn, dictates their performance and stability for either OER or HER in alkaline water splitting. The sulfur-rich materials deposited from nonaqueous solutions underwent a fast and complete transformation into oxyhydroxide species, which represent the OER-active centers. Sulfur-poor materials obtained from aqueous solutions, which exhibited relative stabilization of the sulfide functionality, are more effective for the HER. However, the active sulfide species present in these materials is unstable under prolonged polarization in alkaline HER conditions, and as the pristine sulfide transforms into a hydroxide, the catalytic activity declines significantly.

Graphical Abstract

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Materiomics

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Kokin AA, Chertkova VP, Poltorykhin EI, et al. Comparative analysis of activity trends of sulfur-rich and sulfur-poor electrodeposited amorphous cobalt-based electrocatalysts for alkaline water splitting reactions. Journal of Materiomics, 2026, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmat.2026.101208

3

Views

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Received: 11 December 2025
Revised: 27 January 2026
Accepted: 06 February 2026
Published: 15 March 2026
© 2026 The Authors.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).