AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (15.9 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review | Open Access

Advancements in Mg-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: From design strategies to clinical perspectives

Navdeep Singh Grewala( )Mohit VermaaSanjay KumarbAhsan Riaz Khanc( )Kamal KumardNeeraj Sharmae
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Guru Kashi University, Talwandi-Sabo 151302, India
Department of Physics, Chemistry, and Biology (IFM), Linköping University, Linköping, SE-581 83 Sweden
School of Medical Informational Engineering, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250355, China
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Punjab Engineering College (Deemed to be University), Chandigarh 160012, India
Production Engineering Department, National Institute of Technology, Agartala, Tripura 799046, India

Peer review under the responsibility of Chongqing University.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Mg-based scaffolds are emerging as architected, load-bearing constructs that couple temporary mechanical support with bioactive, self-resorbing behavior. This review integrates advances in geometric design, fabrication, and biological translation of Mg-based scaffolds. The study comprehensively discusses key design parameters, including porosity, pore size, pore shape, pore orientation, strut thickness, alloy composition, and hybrid surface modification strategies. It further highlights that triply periodic minimal surfaces and optimized lattices with tailored interconnected porosity achieve cancellous-bone-like mechanics while enhancing permeability, osteogenesis, angiogenesis, and pro-healing immunomodulation. Various fabrication routes including powder metallurgy, replica casting, laser powder-bed fusion and binder-jetting techniques are compared with respect to microstructural control, defect tolerance, corrosion-fatigue, and scalability. Surface modifications, including fluoride/Ca–P conversion layers, layered double hydroxides, and polymer-ceramic hybrid coatings, act as physical barrier and ion-regulating interfaces that slow the initial corrosion burst, buffer local alkalinity, and provide controlled Mg²⁺ release within a therapeutic window. Collectively, in-vitro and in-vivo investigations show that architected Mg scaffolds are biocompatible, generate only transient hydrogen, and degrade in vivo more slowly and uniformly than static immersion predicts. Bone ingrowth tracks the resorption front, enabling progressive load transfer from the scaffold to regenerating tissue. Compared with planar Mg devices, these lattices mitigate stress shielding, conform to irregular defects, and provide orders-of-magnitude greater surface for osseointegration. To address key translational challenges, including synchronizing scaffold degradation with bone healing, ensuring corrosion-fatigue reliability under physiological conditions, and meeting regulator-compliant manufacturing standards, the review highlights the role of Mg-based biocomposite scaffolds with hybrid surface treatments. These surface strategies improve structural persistence and biological compatibility. Together, they strengthen the pathway toward full-scale clinical translation of Mg scaffolds for orthopedic applications.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Magnesium and Alloys

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Grewal NS, Verma M, Kumar S, et al. Advancements in Mg-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: From design strategies to clinical perspectives. Journal of Magnesium and Alloys, 2026, 16(C). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2026.102010

6

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 20 September 2025
Revised: 04 December 2025
Accepted: 12 January 2026
Published: 03 March 2026
© 2026 Chongqing University.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)