AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (27.5 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

Simple shear extrusion versus equal channel angular pressing: A comparative study on the microstructure and mechanical properties of an Mg alloy

A. RezaeiaR. Mahmudia( )C. CayronbR.E. Logéb
School of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, North Kargar Street, Tehran 14395-515, Iran
Laboratory of Thermomechanical Metallurgy - PX Group Chair, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Neuchâtel CH-2002, Switzerland
Show Author Information

Abstract

Two severe plastic deformation (SPD) techniques of simple shear extrusion (SSE) and equal channel angular pressing (ECAP) were employed to process an extruded Mg−6Gd−3Y−1.5Ag (wt%) alloy at 553 K for 1, 2, 4 and 6 passes. The microstructural evolutions were studied by electron back scattered diffraction (EBSD) analysis and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The initial grain size of 7.5 μm in the extruded alloy was reduced to about 1.3 μm after 6 SPD passes. Discontinuous dynamic recrystallization was suggested to be operative in both SSE and ECAP, with also a potential contribution of continuous dynamic recrystallization at the early stages of deformation. The difference in the shear strain paths of the two SPD techniques caused different progression rate of dynamic recrystallization (DRX), so that the alloys processed by ECAP exhibited higher fractions of recrystallization and high angle grain boundaries (HAGBs). It was revealed that crystallographic texture was also significantly influenced by the difference in the strain paths of the two SPD methods, where dissimilar basal plane texture components were obtained. The compression tests, performed along extrusion direction (ED), indicated that the compressive yield stress (CYS) and ultimate compressive strength (UCS) of the alloys after both SEE and ECAP augmented continuously by increasing the number of passes. ECAP-processed alloys had lower values of CYS and UCS compared to their counterparts processed by SSE. This difference in the mechanical responses was attributed to the different configurations of basal planes with respect to the loading direction (ED) of each SPD technique.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Magnesium and Alloys
Pages 1769-1790

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Rezaei A, Mahmudi R, Cayron C, et al. Simple shear extrusion versus equal channel angular pressing: A comparative study on the microstructure and mechanical properties of an Mg alloy. Journal of Magnesium and Alloys, 2023, 11(5): 1769-1790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2023.05.006

330

Views

9

Downloads

29

Crossref

28

Web of Science

31

Scopus

12

CSCD

Received: 04 November 2022
Revised: 03 May 2023
Accepted: 07 May 2023
Published: 08 June 2023
© 2023 Chongqing University.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) Peer review under responsibility of Chongqing University