AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (16.5 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review | Open Access

Adapting to the enemy: Rice yellow mottle virus (RYMV) evolutionary dynamics and durable resistance in African rice

Isaac Tawiah1,2( ), Richard Akromah1, Alexander Wereko Kena1, Charles Kodia Kwoseh1, Shailesh Yadav2, Kossi Lorimpo Adjah2, Geoffrey Onaga2, Benjamin Annor1, Zenna Negussie2, Tella Hamidatou Euridice2, Scholastica Quaicoe2, Nana Kofi Abaka Amoah2
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi AK-385-1973, Ghana
AfricaRice, Genetic Diversity and Improvement, Bouaké 01 BP 2551, Cote d’Ivoire
Show Author Information

Highlights

• Rice yellow mottle virus (RYMV) evolution dynamics, phylogeographic structuring, and region-specific virus diversity strongly impact resistance durability and patterns of resistance-breaking in African rice systems.

• The main resistance genes RYMV1, RYMV2, and RYMV3 vary in their molecular mechanisms, inheritance patterns, selective pressures, and evolutionary stability. This highlights the need for complementary gene pyramiding and diversified deployment strategies.

• Durable RYMV management in sub-Saharan Africa relies on breeding informed by evolution. This includes marker-assisted pyramiding, genomic selection, continuous virus surveillance, and context-specific deployment supported by emerging biotechnologies.

Abstract

Rice yellow mottle virus (RYMV) is one of the most destructive viral diseases affecting rice production in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), where increasing demand and persistent yield gaps continue to compromise food security. RYMV shows significant genetic and phylogeographic diversity across SSA, driven by mutation, recombination, selection, and restricted regional spread, enabling adaptation to host resistance. The main resistance genes, RYMV1, RYMV2, and RYMV3, primarily derived from Oryza glaberrima, differ in their molecular mechanisms and the selective pressures they impose on viral populations. Resistance breakdown linked to RYMV1 primarily stems from mutations in the viral VPg protein, whereas resistance mediated by RYMV2 and RYMV3 is overcome through changes in the P2a polyprotein and coat protein (CP), respectively. An evolution-informed framework combining viral phylogeography, resistance-breaking pathways, and breeding deployment strategies is proposed to explain regional variation in resistance durability and enhance long-term resistance management. Currently, using marker-assisted pyramiding of complementary resistance genes is the most promising and scalable strategy for achieving durable resistance, while genomic selection provides opportunities to improve both quantitative and background resistance. Sustainable management of RYMV will require region-specific deployment of resistant varieties, continuous surveillance of viral populations, integration of quantitative resistance, and better seed system management to reduce selection pressure and virus spread. Emerging technologies such as genome editing and artificial intelligence-assisted breeding may further expand the resistance toolbox but require careful integration.

Graphical Abstract

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Integrative Agriculture (JIA)
Pages 3927-3940

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Tawiah I, Akromah R, Kena AW, et al. Adapting to the enemy: Rice yellow mottle virus (RYMV) evolutionary dynamics and durable resistance in African rice. Journal of Integrative Agriculture (JIA), 2026, 25(10): 3927-3940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jia.2026.07.025

2

Views

1

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 27 March 2026
Revised: 05 June 2026
Accepted: 03 July 2026
Published: 28 July 2026
© 2026 CAAS.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Board of Journal of Integrative Agriculture.