AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (8.2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Global epidemiological landscape and diagnostic biases reveal persistent endemic circulation of porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Yassein M. Ibrahim1,2,3,*, Yuandi Yu1,2,4,*, Gebremeskel Mamu Werid5,*, Ashenafi Kiros Wubshet6,7, Thien Dinh Van5, Weldu Tesfagaber8, Joshua W. Aleri9, Wenxiu Wang6, Liu Yang1,2,4, Lizhi Fu1,2,4( ), Yue Wang1,2,10( )
National Center of Technology Innovation for Pigs, Chongqing 402460, China
Chongqing Academy of Animal Science, Chongqing 402460, China
Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Nyala, Nyala 155, Sudan
Rongchang, Animal Health, Observation and Research Station, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Chongqing 402460, China
Davies Livestock Research Centre, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Adelaide University, Roseworthy, SA 5371, Australia
Shandong Binzhou Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Sciences, Binzhou 256600, China
College of Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, China
State Key Laboratory for Animal Disease Control and Prevention/National African Swine Fever Para-Reference Laboratory/National High Containment Facilities for Animal Diseases Control and Prevention, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin 150069, China
School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia
College of Veterinary Medicine, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China

* These authors contributed equally to this study.

Show Author Information

Highlights

• Reframes PEDV as an endemic pathogen sustained by subclinical breeding-herd reservoirs, shifting the control focus from outbreak response to silent transmission.

• Identifies diagnostic-method bias as the principal source of global prevalence heterogeneity, mandating standardized multi-modal surveillance.

• Delivers the first integrated evidence-based framework to systematically harmonize PEDV prevalence reporting across animal, herd, and diagnostic levels.

Abstract

Porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus (PEDV) is a major enteric pathogen of global swine production, yet its true epidemiological burden remains inadequately characterised due to heterogeneity in surveillance systems, diagnostic sensitivity, and reporting frameworks. To clarify the global epidemiological profile of PEDV, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis integrating animal- and herd-level data while evaluating the influence of diagnostic methods and population characteristics on detection outcomes. Across 133 studies from 22 countries, PEDV was frequently detected in both clinically affected and apparently healthy pigs, indicating sustained endemic circulation rather than episodic outbreak dynamics. Molecular assays identified ongoing active infection, while serological data demonstrated extensive historical exposure, together revealing substantial silent transmission within swine herds. Detection patterns varied markedly by age group, geographic region, and study period; sows appeared to act as potential viral reservoirs, while neonatal piglets served as principal transmission amplifiers. Among clinically affected pigs, pooled nucleic acid-based detection rate was 46.0% (95% CI: 39.8–52.2), with the highest point estimates observed in sows and boars at 76.5% (95% CI: 28.9–100.0), though these were imprecise with wide confidence intervals, and in suckling piglets at 44.7% (95% CI: 35.6–53.9). Serological analysis revealed a seroprevalence of 14.6% (95% CI: 0.8–40.0) in clinically affected animals, reflecting cumulative population exposure. At the herd level, nucleic acid-based detection yielded a pooled detection rate of 44.6% (95% CI: 33.6–55.9), while serological estimates reached 39.0% (95% CI: 14.6–66.3), collectively supporting widespread herd-level circulation. Substantial between-study heterogeneity was largely attributable to temporal, regional, and herd health factors, underscoring how surveillance design and diagnostic strategy can substantially influence reported prevalence and obscure the true scale of viral spread. Collectively, these findings indicate that PEDV is a globally entrenched, persistently circulating pathogen sustained through subclinical infection and herd-level viral persistence. This work provides the first comprehensive global synthesis of PEDV epidemiology and establishes an evidence-based framework to guide standardised surveillance, contextualise diagnostic outcomes, and inform targeted prevention strategies encompassing vaccination and biosecurity. Strengthening harmonised monitoring systems will be essential to reducing the long-term burden of PEDV in modern swine production.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Integrative Agriculture (JIA)
Pages 3971-3989

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Ibrahim YM, Yu Y, Werid GM, et al. Global epidemiological landscape and diagnostic biases reveal persistent endemic circulation of porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Integrative Agriculture (JIA), 2026, 25(10): 3971-3989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jia.2026.07.022

1

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 11 March 2026
Revised: 20 June 2026
Accepted: 07 July 2026
Published: 17 July 2026
© 2026 CAAS.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Board of Journal of Integrative Agriculture.