AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.5 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Co-application of alternate wetting and drying irrigation and Bacillus subtilis increases yield and reduces N2O emissions in paddy ecosystems

Fan Ye1, Siyu Li2, Yaguang Xue3, Weiyang Zhang1, Hao Zhang1, Junfei Gu1, Jianchang Yang1, Yun Chen1, Lijun Liu1( )
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology/Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops/Key Laboratory of Arable Land Quality Monitoring and Evaluation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
Jiangsu Lixiahe Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Yangzhou 225007, China
Jiangsu Yanjiang Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Nantong 226012, China
Show Author Information

Highlights

• Bacillus subtilis (BS) increased rice yield under both continuous flooding (CF) and alternate wetting and drying (WD) irrigation.

• WD alone increased N2O emissions, while BS application mitigated the N2O emissions by 34.8–45.9% under WD.

• WD+BS enhanced soil N transformation and nosZ abundance, balancing high yield with low N2O emissions.

Abstract

Alternate wetting and drying (WD) irrigation is an effective water-saving practice for rice production but often increases nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions. Plant growth-promoting bacteria such as Bacillus subtilis (BS) can enhance crop growth; however, the combined effects of WD and BS on rice yield and N2O emissions remain unclear. A 3-year field experiment using two japonica rice cultivars was conducted to evaluate the effects of two irrigation regimes (continuous flooding (CF) and WD) and BS application (without BS, –BS; and with BS, +BS) on rice yield and N2O emissions. The results showed that BS application significantly increased the rice yields under both irrigation regimes. Compared with CF–BS, CF+BS and WD+BS increased the yields by 3.9–9.0% and 5.8–12.6%, respectively, mainly due to a higher total spikelet number. CF+BS had no significant effect on N2O emissions, whereas WD–BS markedly increased cumulative N2O emissions, while WD+BS reduced emissions by 34.8–45.9% compared with WD–BS. The WD+BS treatment enhanced root oxidation activity and increased root surface area and volume density in the 20–40 cm soil layer. It also reduced the soil NO3−-N content, raised the NH4+/NO3− ratio, and enhanced urease and sucrase activities, thereby promoting the accumulation of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN), along with a higher abundance of the nitrous oxide reductase gene (nosZ) associated with N2O reduction. Overall, integrating WD with BS increased rice yield while mitigating N2O emissions. The enhanced root function and aboveground agronomic traits, improved soil enzyme activity, and optimized nitrogen transformation and microbial processes were the key mechanisms for achieving a high yield with reduced environmental impacts.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Integrative Agriculture (JIA)
Pages 4075-4089

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Ye F, Li S, Xue Y, et al. Co-application of alternate wetting and drying irrigation and Bacillus subtilis increases yield and reduces N2O emissions in paddy ecosystems. Journal of Integrative Agriculture (JIA), 2026, 25(10): 4075-4089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jia.2026.03.050

1

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 26 January 2026
Revised: 14 February 2026
Accepted: 06 March 2026
Published: 20 March 2026
© 2026 CAAS.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Board of Journal of Integrative Agriculture.