AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (12.5 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

A classification modeling strategy based on dominant factors of salinization to enhance remote sensing inversion accuracy

Mengchao Zheng1,2Jianjun Zhang2( )Weini Wang4Zhigang Qiao6Junmei Liu4Min Gong1Xiaobin Li1,3( )Hongyuan Zhang1,3Yuyi Li1,3Ningning Li5Lin Yang2Wenjuan Li1
State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-arid Arable Land in Northern China, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
National Center of Technology Innovation for Comprehensive Utilization of Saline-alkali Land, Dongying 257000, China
Ordos Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Ecology and Resource Protection Center, Ordos 017001, China
College of Geography and Remote Sensing Sciences, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Technology Extension Center, Hohhot 010010, China
Show Author Information

Highlights

• Internal partition modeling, driven by key factors, enhances model accuracy.

• Among all scenarios, the random forest (RF) model exhibits superior overall performance.

• Drainage conditions and soil texture significantly influence the correlation between modeling factors and soil salt content (SSC).

• A high-precision prediction methodology based on primary salinization drivers is proposed.

Abstract

Soil salinization represents a primary manifestation of land degradation and presents a significant threat to sustainable agricultural development. Remote sensing-based methodologies currently constitute the preferred approach for salinization monitoring. Environmental factors’ spatial heterogeneity substantially constrains the modeling process in accurately capturing the soil salt content (SSC)-modeling factor relationship, thereby affecting monitoring accuracy. This study proposes a classification modeling framework based on dominant salinization factors, establishing distinct remote sensing inversion models through categorization of soil texture and surface drainage conditions. Results indicate that classification modeling substantially improves the capture of SSC-modeling factor relationships. The efficacy of identical modeling indicators and methods varies significantly across different classification scenarios. Among the three modeling approaches, random forest demonstrates superior overall robustness. Of the three variable selection methods, light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) shows the strongest compatibility with the modeling approaches. The classification strategy significantly enhances model accuracy: compared to non-classified modeling (RV2=0.62), the testing set R2 increases by up to 24% (RV2=0.77). Models under poor surface drainage category demonstrate optimal performance, with coupled models achieving RC2=0.82 (training set) and RV2=0.77 (testing set). This research provides valuable insights for remote sensing monitoring of soil salinization in precision agriculture contexts.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Integrative Agriculture (JIA)
Pages 2607-2622

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Zheng M, Zhang J, Wang W, et al. A classification modeling strategy based on dominant factors of salinization to enhance remote sensing inversion accuracy. Journal of Integrative Agriculture (JIA), 2026, 25(6): 2607-2622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jia.2025.08.016

126

Views

0

Downloads

2

Crossref

2

Web of Science

2

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 01 April 2025
Revised: 13 May 2025
Accepted: 02 July 2025
Published: 21 August 2025
© 2026 CAAS.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Board of Journal of Integrative Agriculture.