AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (534.8 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline

Does the adoption of direct-seeded rice affect pesticide use? Evidence from China

Chao Zhang1( ), Shanshan Li1, Fan Yang1, Ruifa Hu2
School of Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 102488, China
Institute of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, Peking University, Weifang 262113, China
Show Author Information

Highlights

  • The adoption of direct-seeded rice (DSR) increases pesticide expenditure by 401.72 CNY ha–1 in China's Yangtze River Basin.

  • DSR adoption demonstrates the most substantial positive impact on insecticide expenditure, and the least positive impact on herbicide expenditure.

  • DSR adoption exhibits a stronger positive impact on pesticide expenditure among farmers under 60 years of age, with minimum 6 years of education, and managing rice sown areas below 2 ha.

Abstract

In China, farmers have increasingly adopted direct-seeded rice (DSR). While various impacts of DSR have been studied, limited evidence exists regarding the effect of DSR adoption on pesticide use. This study examines the impact of DSR adoption on pesticide use utilizing data from a 2018 survey of 982 rice farmers in China's Yangtze River Basin. The endogenous treatment-regression and switching regression models are employed to address self-selection bias. The results indicate that, after accounting for self-selection, DSR adopters spend 401.72 CNY ha–1 more on pesticides compared to non-adopters. Although DSR adoption significantly increases the use of insecticides, fungicides and herbicides, its impact is most pronounced for insecticide expenditure and least pronounced for herbicide expenditure. The findings remain robust when altering the dependent variable, truncating the research sample, and modifying the estimation method. Heterogeneous analysis reveals that DSR adoption has a stronger positive impact on pesticide expenditure among farmers below 60 years of age, with at least 6 years of education, and managing rice sown areas less than 2 ha. Based on these findings, this study recommends enhancing complementary techniques for DSR, improving the dissemination of DSR cultivation technologies, and strengthening socialized services. This research provides a comprehensive assessment of DSR's advantages and disadvantages, particularly regarding pesticide use, offering important policy implications for pesticide reduction.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Integrative Agriculture (JIA)
Pages 366-376

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Zhang C, Li S, Yang F, et al. Does the adoption of direct-seeded rice affect pesticide use? Evidence from China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture (JIA), 2026, 25(1): 366-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jia.2025.04.014

503

Views

4

Downloads

6

Crossref

5

Web of Science

5

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 24 March 2024
Revised: 12 November 2024
Accepted: 03 April 2025
Published: 18 April 2025
© 2026, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS). All rights reserved.