AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (5.3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Precise quantification of skeletal muscle fibers reveals the physiological basis for growth rate discrepancies in broilers

Shuang Gu1,2Chaoyi Wang1,2Qiang Huang1,2Qiulian Wang1,2Junying Li1,2,3Congjiao Sun1,2,3Chaoliang Wen1,2,3Ning Yang1,2,3( )
State Key Laboratory of Animal Biotech Breeding/Frontier Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding/Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
Sanya Institute of China Agricultural University, Hainan 572025, China
Show Author Information

Highlights

• First precise quantification of total muscle fiber number in poultry skeletal muscle.

• Higher muscle fiber count drives rapid growth and high meat yield in fast-growing broilers.

• Total muscle fiber number serves as a key breeding target for improved broiler meat quality.

Abstract

Skeletal muscle is composed of multinucleated muscle fibers, which play a crucial role in determining the quality of meat products in livestock. Quantifying the total number of muscle fibers (TNM) is essential for understanding muscle composition, but this remains challenging in poultry, particularly since the considerable number of livestock complicates the preparation of tissue sections for analysis and makes the counting process laborious. Our previous study developed an automatic muscle fiber quantification tool powered by deep learning, named MyoV, which has addressed this bottleneck. This study employed the MyoV tool for accurately quantifying TNM in the pectoral muscles of slow-growing (SL), medium-growing (ML), and fast-growing (FL) broilers. The results showed that FL group exhibited higher growth performance compared to ML and SL groups from the embryonic to rearing stages. Processing of whole slide images of pectoral muscle revealed significantly higher TNM in FL and ML groups than in SL group (P<0.01). The TNM values of FL, ML and SL groups were 693,568.00±54,169.80, 652,122.00±65,822.60, and 539,778.57±40,722.94 at 7 days of age (D7), respectively; and 663,014.93±58,801.11, 645,784.76±80,204.34 and 507,280.29±98,092.16 at D35 for FL, ML and SL groups, respectively. Differences in the cross-sectional area (CSA) of muscle fibers among the three groups were consistent with the TNM results. A correlation analysis showed correlation coefficients of 0.73–0.89 between body weight (BW) and TNM and 0.78–0.87 between BW and CSA. These findings directly indicate that the number of muscle fibers in broilers is an important foundation for their rapid growth and development. This study precisely quantified the muscle fiber number of an important skeletal muscle in poultry for the first time, which provides direct evidence for the physiological basis of rapid development in broilers and offers important data support for further in-depth studies on muscle fiber development.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Integrative Agriculture (JIA)
Pages 3368-3378

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Gu S, Wang C, Huang Q, et al. Precise quantification of skeletal muscle fibers reveals the physiological basis for growth rate discrepancies in broilers. Journal of Integrative Agriculture (JIA), 2026, 25(8): 3368-3378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jia.2024.08.008

4

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 13 April 2024
Revised: 27 June 2024
Accepted: 16 July 2024
Published: 20 August 2024
© 2026 CAAS.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Board of Journal of Integrative Agriculture.