AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.8 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Using mixed kernel support vector machine to improve the predictive accuracy of genome selection

Jinbu Wang1, Wencheng Zong1, Liangyu Shi2, Mianyan Li1, Jia Li1,3, Deming Ren1,4, Fuping Zhao1, Lixian Wang1( ), Ligang Wang1( )
Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction (poultry) of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China
School of Animal Science and Nutritional Engineering, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430023, China
College of Animal Science and Technology, Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing 102206, China
College of Animal Science and Technology, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China
Show Author Information

Highlights

• We introduced mixed kernel functions and associated theories into genomic selection for the first time.

• We applied the Laplacian kernel and Cosine kernel functions to the support vector machine algorithm in the field of genomic selection for the first time.

• We proposed optimal weights for the mixed kernel support vector machine applied to traits with varying heritabilities. The SVR_GS algorithm exhibited robust performance in genomic selection.

Abstract

The advantages of genome selection (GS) in animal and plant breeding are self-evident. Traditional parametric models have disadvantage in better fit the increasingly large sequencing data and capture complex effects accurately. Machine learning models have demonstrated remarkable potential in addressing these challenges. In this study, we introduced the concept of mixed kernel functions to explore the performance of support vector machine regression (SVR) in GS. Six single kernel functions (SVR_L, SVR_C, SVR_G, SVR_P, SVR_S, SVR_L) and four mixed kernel functions (SVR_GS, SVR_GP, SVR_LS, SVR_LP) were used to predict genome breeding values. The prediction accuracy, mean squared error (MSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) were used as evaluation indicators to compare with two traditional parametric models (GBLUP, BayesB) and two popular machine learning models (RF, KcRR). The results indicate that in most cases, the performance of the mixed kernel function model significantly outperforms that of GBLUP, BayesB and single kernel function. For instance, for T1 in the pig dataset, the predictive accuracy of SVR_GS is improved by 10% compared to GBLUP, and by approximately 4.4 and 18.6% compared to SVR_G and SVR_S respectively. For E1 in the wheat dataset, SVR_GS achieves 13.3% higher prediction accuracy than GBLUP. Among single kernel functions, the Laplacian and Gaussian kernel functions yield similar results, with the Gaussian kernel function performing better. The mixed kernel function notably reduces the MSE and MAE when compared to all single kernel functions. Furthermore, regarding runtime, SVR_GS and SVR_GP mixed kernel functions run approximately three times faster than GBLUP in the pig dataset, with only a slight increase in runtime compared to the single kernel function model. In summary, the mixed kernel function model of SVR demonstrates speed and accuracy competitiveness, and the model such as SVR_GS has important application potential for GS.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Integrative Agriculture (JIA)
Pages 775-787

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Wang J, Zong W, Shi L, et al. Using mixed kernel support vector machine to improve the predictive accuracy of genome selection. Journal of Integrative Agriculture (JIA), 2026, 25(2): 775-787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jia.2024.03.083

406

Views

5

Downloads

4

Crossref

4

Web of Science

4

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 08 November 2023
Revised: 31 January 2024
Accepted: 28 February 2024
Published: 29 March 2024
© 2026 CAAS.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Board of Journal of Integrative Agriculture.