AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (594.2 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline

Optimizing tillage and fertilization practices to improve the carbon footprint and energy efficiency of wheat–maize cropping systems

Kun Han1,2, Xinzhu Li2, Liang Jia2, Dazhao Yu2, Wenhua Xu2, Hongkun Chen3, Tao Song4, Peng Liu1( )
National Key Laboratory for Crop Biology/Key Laboratory for Crop Water Physiology and Drought-tolerance Germplasm Improvement, College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an 271018, China
Kingenta Ecological Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Linyi 276000, China
Heze Kingenta Ecological Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Heze 274000, China
Qingyuan Kingenta Ecological Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Qingyuan 511500, China
Show Author Information

Highlights

  • Subsoiling rotary tillage (SRT) optimizes C footprint (CF) and energy use.

  • Hybrid fertilizer (HF) reduces CF and energy efficiency.

  • SRT+HF has the best overall performance for crop production, CF and energy use.

Abstract

To make agricultural systems sustainable in terms of their greenness and efficiency, optimizing the tillage and fertilization practices is essential. To assess the effects of tilling and fertilization practices in wheat–maize cropping systems, a three-year field experiment was designed to quantify the carbon footprint (CF) and energy efficiency of the cropping systems in the North China Plain. The study parameters included four tillage practices (no tillage (NT), conventional tillage (CT), rotary tillage (RT), and subsoiling rotary tillage (SRT)) and two fertilizer regimes (inorganic fertilizer (IF) and hybrid fertilizer with organic and inorganic components (HF)). The results indicated that the most prominent energy inputs and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions could be ascribed to the use of fertilizers and fuel consumption. Under the same fertilization regime, ranking the tillage patterns with respect to the value of the crop yield, profit, CF, energy use efficiency (EUE) or energy productivity (EP) for either wheat or maize always gave the same sequence of SRT>RT>CT>NT. For the same tillage, the energy consumption associated with HF was higher than IF, but its GHG emissions and CF were lower while the yield and profit were higher. In terms of overall performance, tilling is more beneficial than NT, and reduced tillage practices (RT and SRT) are more beneficial than CT. The fertilization regime with the best overall performance was HF. Combining SRT with HF has significant potential for reducing CF and increasing EUE, thereby improving sustainability. Adopting measures that promote these optimizations can help to overcome the challenges posed by a lack of food security, energy crises and ecological stress.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Integrative Agriculture (JIA)
Pages 3789-3802

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Han K, Li X, Jia L, et al. Optimizing tillage and fertilization practices to improve the carbon footprint and energy efficiency of wheat–maize cropping systems. Journal of Integrative Agriculture (JIA), 2025, 24(10): 3789-3802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jia.2024.03.026

568

Views

6

Downloads

11

Crossref

9

Web of Science

10

Scopus

1

CSCD

Received: 16 October 2023
Revised: 17 November 2023
Accepted: 01 February 2024
Published: 06 March 2024
© 2025, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS). All rights reserved.