AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.8 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline

A suitable organic fertilizer substitution ratio stabilizes rainfed maize yields and reduces gaseous nitrogen loss in the Loess Plateau, China

Lihua Xie1,2, Lingling Li1( ), Junhong Xie1, Jinbin Wang1, Zechariah Effah3, Setor Kwami Fudjoe1, Muhammad Zahid Mumtaz1
State Key Lab of Aridland Crop Sciences/College of Agronomy, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
Institute of Soil, Fertilizer and Water-saving Agriculture, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou 730070, China
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-Plant Genetic Resources Research Institute, Bunso 97620, Ghana
Show Author Information

Highlights

  • The optimal substitution (37.5%) of inorganic fertilizer with organic fertilizer promoted maize production and reduced gaseous nitrogen loss in northern China rainfed maize fields.

  • NH4+-N, alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen, moisture, abundances of AOB and nirK-harboring genes were the main environmental factor affecting gaseous nitrogen loss.

Abstract

The application of organic fertilizers has become an increasingly popular practice in maize production to reduce the gaseous nitrogen (N) loss and soil degradation caused by inorganic fertilizers. Organic fertilizer plays a key role in improving soil quality and stabilizing maize yields, but few studies have compared different substitution rates. A field study was carried out in 2021 and 2022, based on a long-term trial initiated in 2016, which included five organic fertilizer N substitution rates with equal inputs of 200 kg N ha–1: 0% organic fertilizer (T1, 100% inorganic fertilizer), 50.0% organic+50.0% inorganic fertilizer (T2), 37.5% organic+62.5% inorganic fertilizer (T3), 25.0% organic+75.0% inorganic fertilizer (T4), and 12.5% organic+87.5% inorganic fertilizer (T5), as well as a no fertilizer control (T6). The results of the two years showed that T3 and T1 had the highest grain yield and biomass, respectively, and there was no significant difference between T1 and T3. Compared with T1, the 12.5, 25.0, 37.5, and 50.0% substitution rates in T5, T4, T3, and T2 significantly reduced total nitrogen losses (NH3, N2O) by 8.3, 16.1, 18.7, and 27.0%, respectively. Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) was higher in T5, T3, and T1, and there were no significant differences among them. Organic fertilizer substitution directly reduced NH3 volatilization and N2O emission from farmland by lowering the ammonium nitrogen and alkali-dissolved N contents and by increasing soil moisture. These substitution treatments reduced N2O emissions indirectly by regulating the abundances of AOB and nirK-harboring genes by promoting soil moisture. Specifically, the 37.5% organic fertilizer substitution reduces NH3 volatilization and N2O emission from farmland by reducing the ammonium nitrogen and alkali-dissolved N contents and increasing moisture, which negatively regulate the abundance of AOB and nirK-harboring genes to reduce N2O emissions indirectly in rainfed maize fields on the Loess Plateau of China.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Journal of Integrative Agriculture (JIA)
Pages 2138-2154

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Xie L, Li L, Xie J, et al. A suitable organic fertilizer substitution ratio stabilizes rainfed maize yields and reduces gaseous nitrogen loss in the Loess Plateau, China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture (JIA), 2025, 24(6): 2138-2154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jia.2024.03.021

989

Views

16

Downloads

16

Crossref

18

Web of Science

20

Scopus

2

CSCD

Received: 18 September 2023
Revised: 15 January 2024
Accepted: 01 February 2024
Published: 06 March 2024
© 2025, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS). All rights reserved.