AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Article | Open Access

Cost-effectiveness analysis of 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine for adults in China

Yamin Shua,#Shuhua Tanb,#Yao ChencYiling DingaPingping Xud( )Qilin Zhange( )
Department of Pharmacy, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
International Research Center for Medicinal Administration, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
Department of Statistical Sciences, Univerisity of Toronto, Toronto M5S6E8, Canada
Department of Colorectal Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
Department of Pharmacy, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China

# These authors contributed equally to this work.

Show Author Information

Highlights

• The 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) is cost-effective at willingness-to-pay thresholds of 2–3 × the gross domestic product per capita.

• PPSV23 prevents 1,115 cases and 35 deaths from a population of 100,000 individuals.

• Result was most sensitive to variations in the discount rate and serotype coverage.

• No new or unexpected safety concerns for PPSV23 were identified.

Abstract

Background

With population aging and the rising burden of chronic diseases, pneumococcal disease imposes increasing pressure on the healthcare system in China. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) in adults aged 50 years.

Methods

A decision-tree–based static cohort Markov model was developed to estimate lifetime costs and health outcomes from a societal perspective under a hypothetical strategy of PPSV23 vaccination at age 50 with revaccination at age 65 to assess long-term protection under waning immunity; a single-dose strategy was examined in scenario analyses. The model estimated quality-adjusted life-years, life-years, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, and cases and deaths averted. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess parameter uncertainty. Price simulations were performed across different willingness-to-pay thresholds. Safety was evaluated using the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System through descriptive analysis and empirical Bayesian data mining.

Results

The estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for PPSV23 compared to no vaccination are $12,937.07 per quality-adjusted life-year gained and $9,622.25 per life-year gained, with the administration of PPSV23 preventing 1,115 cases and 35 deaths from a study population of 100,000 individuals. The greatest sensitivity was observed to variations in the discount rate, serotype coverage of PPSV23, vaccine efficacy of PPSV23 and cost per dose of PPSV23. No new or unexpected safety concerns for PPSV23 were identified.

Conclusions

PPSV23 is a cost-effective option for adults aged 50 years in China at higher willingness-to-pay thresholds (e.g., 2–3 × the gross domestic product per capita), with a favorable post-marketing safety profile.

Graphical Abstract

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
imj-5-2-100258_esm.docx (884.5 KB)

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Infectious Medicine

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Shu Y, Tan S, Chen Y, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine for adults in China. Infectious Medicine, 2026, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imj.2026.100258

8

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Received: 27 November 2025
Revised: 04 March 2026
Accepted: 12 March 2026
Published: 01 June 2026
© 2026 The Authors.

This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)