AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Home hLife Article
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review | Open Access

Ex-Tregs: From controversial artifact to therapeutic target

Liping Li1,2Minghui Li3,4,5( )Xuyu Zhou1,2( )
CAS Key Laboratory of Pathogen Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Medical School, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Department of Hepatology Division 2, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
HBV Infection, Clinical Cure and Immunology Joint Laboratory for Clinical Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
Department of Hepatology Division 2, Peking University Ditan Teaching Hospital, Beijing, China
Show Author Information

Highlights

• The “self vs non-self” hypothesis explains regulatory T cell (Treg) instability.

• Three pillars drive ex-Treg conversion: signals, epigenetics, and metabolism.

• Ex-Tregs serve as an evolved checkpoint that balances tolerance and defense.

• Targeting Treg stability offers therapeutic avenues for autoimmunity and cancer.

Abstract

Regulatory T cell (Treg) instability has evolved from a debated artifact into a central concept in immunology, though the mechanisms driving the transition from a stable suppressor to a pathogenic ex-regulatory T cell (ex-Treg) remain unclear. This review synthesizes findings from fate-mapping, epigenetic, and metabolic studies in mouse models and human systems, tracing the ex-Treg concept through three phases: controversy, epigenetic reconciliation, and current views. The Treg-specific demethylated region (TSDR) distinguishes truly committed Tregs from transient forkhead box P3 (FOXP3) expressers. Three interdependent factors—environmental stress (interleukin-1β [IL-1β], interleukin-6 [IL-6]), epigenetic erasure (ten-eleven translocation 2 [TET2] dysfunction leading to TSDR hypermethylation), and metabolic rewiring (mechanistic target of rapamycin [mTOR]-driven glycolysis)—cooperatively drive ex-Treg conversion. The “self vs non-self” hypothesis frames instability as an evolved checkpoint balancing tolerance with host defense. Ex-Tregs contribute to autoimmunity and aging but also offer therapeutic opportunities in cancer. Key uncertainties persist regarding ex-Treg heterogeneity, epigenetic reversibility, and translation to humans. Future directions should focus on biomarker discovery and engineering epigenetically stable Tregs for therapy. Collectively, these advances position Treg instability as a pivotal regulator of immune homeostasis and highlight the promise of therapeutically targeting this pathway to advance treatments for autoimmunity, aging, and cancer.

Graphical Abstract

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
hLife
Pages 467-485

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Li L, Li M, Zhou X. Ex-Tregs: From controversial artifact to therapeutic target. hLife, 2026, 4(8): 467-485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlife.2026.05.002

4

Views

0

Crossref

Received: 21 March 2026
Revised: 11 May 2026
Accepted: 13 May 2026
Published: 01 August 2026
© 2026 The Author(s).

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).