AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (2.3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Efficacy and safety of middle meningeal artery embolization in combination with burr hole craniostomy for chronic subdural hematomas: A single-center experience

Jiandong Wu1Peng Deng1Jinhong QianZhiliang DingMian Ma( )Xiaoyu Tang( )
Department of Neurosurgery, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Suzhou Hospital: Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China

1 These authors contributed equally to this work.

Peer review under the responsibility of Editorial Board of Brain Hemorrhages.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Background and Objective

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a prevalent neurosurgical condition. The mass effect of hematoma could lead to a series of neurological dysfunctions. Surgical intervention, such as burr hole craniostomy (BHC), is often recommended due to persistent symptoms, but recurrence rates remain significant. Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) is a promising treatment strategy for CSDH, this study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MMAE in combination with BHC for managing CSDH.

Methods

A comparative analysis was conducted on 101 patients (harboring 123 CSDHs) who underwent either burr hole craniostomy alone or combined therapy with burr hole craniostomy and MMAE. Data on demographic information, clinical characteristics, treatment modalities, and outcomes were collected and analyzed.

Results

Combined therapy with burr hole craniostomy and MMAE resulted in lower recurrence rates compared to burr hole craniostomy alone. Complication rates were similar between groups, and MMAE was technically successful in all cases. Patients in the combined therapy group showed an improved GOS score at the predefined 6-month follow-up.

Conclusion

Middle meningeal artery embolization, when combined with burr hole craniostomy, represents a safe and effective approach for managing CSDH, resulting in reduced recurrence rates and improved short-term outcomes.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Brain Hemorrhages
Pages 225-230

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Wu J, Deng P, Qian J, et al. Efficacy and safety of middle meningeal artery embolization in combination with burr hole craniostomy for chronic subdural hematomas: A single-center experience. Brain Hemorrhages, 2026, 7(4): 225-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hest.2024.10.004

3

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Received: 02 August 2024
Revised: 03 October 2024
Accepted: 24 October 2024
Published: 28 October 2024
© 2024 International Hemorrhagic Stroke Association.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).