AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (26.7 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research paper | Open Access

Accuracy analysis of topography estimation from geoid heights and vertical gravity and vertical gravity gradient

Lei Lianga,bHuan Xuc( )Chao Dongc( )Lingyong HuangaJinhai Yud
National Key Laboratory of Intelligent Spatial Information, Beijing 100029, China
School of Geographic Information and Tourism, Chuzhou University, Chuzhou 239000, China
Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Survey Technology and Application, Guangzhou 510300, China
State Key Laboratory of Earth System Numerical Modeling and Application, College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

This study investigates the accuracy requirements for predicting seafloor topography using anomalies in geoid height (GH), vertical gravity (VG), and vertical gravity gradient (VGG), based on their analytic formulas for rectangular prisms. Simulations conducted under a specified observation accuracy demonstrate that VGG anomalies are more effective for high-resolution topography estimation in shallow seas, whereas lower resolution is preferable in deep-sea regions. Furthermore, we formulate observation equations linking GH, VG and VGG anomalies to topography and verify through simulation that these equations are well-posed and solvable. The robustness of these observation equations against errors is also evaluated. When random and systematic errors in the GH, VG and VGG anomalies are set to 3 cm, 1 mGal, and 1 E (Eötvös, 1 E = 10−9 s−2), respectively, the root mean square (RMS) errors of the predicted topography remain below 70 m. Additionally, the simulations indicate that the observation equations exhibit greater resistance to systematic errors than to random errors. The impacts of density and reference depth errors on the observation equations are also examined. The results reveal a strong correlation between these errors and the prediction accuracy. With a 20% relative error in the density constant, the RMS errors for topography derived from GH, VG and VGG data are all under 130 m. Moreover, the RMS error increases approximately linearly with the reference depth error. Finally, to reduce the influence of boundary and far-field effects, the sea area outside the study region is divided into a boundary zone and a far zone, with “regularization” and “remove-compute-restore” techniques applied accordingly.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Geodesy and Geodynamics
Pages 436-446

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Liang L, Xu H, Dong C, et al. Accuracy analysis of topography estimation from geoid heights and vertical gravity and vertical gravity gradient. Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2026, 17(4): 436-446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2025.11.004

8

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 22 June 2025
Revised: 10 November 2025
Accepted: 24 November 2025
Published: 02 January 2026
© 2025 Editorial office of Geodesy and Geodynamics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).