AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (34.2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research paper | Open Access

Co-seismic gravity changes of the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake from different releases of GRACE monthly solutions

Jing Lia,bJin Lia,b( )Jianli Chenc,dChi Zhaoa,b
Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200030, China
School of Astronomy and Space Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Department of Land Surveying and Geo-Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, China
Research Institute for Land and Space, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) Level-2 products, i.e., monthly gravity field models expressed in spheric harmonic (SH) coefficients, have been released in several versions since 2002. In this study, we analyze the extraction of co-seismic signals associated with the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman MW9.1 earthquake, using GRACE data from four versions, namely the RL01, RL04, RL05, and RL06, provided by the Center for Space Research (CSR), University of Texas at Austin. Results indicate that the co-seismic signals extracted from later versions of GRACE data are less affected by noise. Moreover, the earliest RL01 vision can also reflect the co-seismic gravity-change signals of the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake. In particular, we find that the spatial pattern of the co-seismic signals extracted from the RL04 version of GRACE data exhibits significant distortion, which is probably due to the large errors introduced in the processing of the atmosphere and ocean models in the gravity field inversion. Comparison between the dislocation model prediction and GRACE observation suggests that the GRACE results from later versions are more consistent with the model prediction. In addition, the dislocation models with stronger constraints from near-field measurements during the fault-slip inversion provide a more consistent prediction with the GRACE observation. The uncertainty estimation of GRACE data over the global oceanic region reveals that the noise levels gradually decrease from the earlier to later versions, with the RMSs of 7.1, 4.9, 2.4, and 2.1 μGal (with 300 km spatial smoothing) for the RL01, RL04, RL05, and RL06 versions, respectively.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Geodesy and Geodynamics
Pages 341-351

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Li J, Li J, Chen J, et al. Co-seismic gravity changes of the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake from different releases of GRACE monthly solutions. Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2026, 17(3): 341-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2025.07.005

189

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

1

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 07 May 2025
Revised: 05 July 2025
Accepted: 17 July 2025
Published: 10 November 2025
© 2025 Editorial office of Geodesy and Geodynamics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).