AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (3.4 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review | Open Access

Advances and challenges in N2O valorization for alkane oxidative dehydrogenation to olefins

Yunshuo Wua,b,cXuanhao Wua,b,cHaiqiang Wanga,b,c( )Zhongbiao Wua,b,c( )
College of Environmental & Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China
Key Laboratory of Environment Remediation and Ecological Health, Ministry of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China
Zhejiang Provincial Engineering Research Center of Industrial Boiler Furnace Flue Gas Pollution Control, Hangzhou, 310058, China
Show Author Information

HIGHLIGHTS

• This review summarizes recent advances in N2O valorization/utilization in heterogeneous catalysis.

• The difference between N2O and O2 as an oxidant is presented in detail.

• The key focus is on the oxidative dehydrogenation of propane (ODHP) to produce propylene and the oxidative coupling of methane (OCM) to produce ethylene.

• Catalyst developments and reaction mechanisms driving these conversions are explored in detail, along with identifying key scientific issues.

• A promising strategy is proposed to break activity-selectivity trade-off by separating redox centers in catalyst design.

Abstract

Valorization of nitrous oxide (N2O), a potent greenhouse gas, through the oxidative dehydrogenation of light alkanes such as methane and propane to produce light olefins (ethylene and propylene), presents a promising technique for both environmental mitigation and valuable chemical production. This review provides a systematic analysis of the differences between N2O and O2 as oxidants, emphasizing the distinctive advantages of N2O as a mild oxidant for olefin production. It delves into key technologies, such as oxidative dehydrogenation of propane (ODHP) to propylene and oxidative coupling of methane (OCM) to ethylene, focusing on the underlying reaction mechanisms and recent advancements in catalyst development. A major challenge in these reactions is the trade-off between activity and selectivity. To address this, we propose an innovative strategy–redox center separation–to enhance catalytic performance. This comprehensive review offers valuable insights for the rational design of catalysts, advancing sustainable chemical engineering processes that utilize N2O, while addressing critical environmental and industrial challenges.

Graphical Abstract

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Green Chemical Engineering
Pages 137-146

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Wu Y, Wu X, Wang H, et al. Advances and challenges in N2O valorization for alkane oxidative dehydrogenation to olefins. Green Chemical Engineering, 2026, 7(2): 137-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gce.2024.11.005

307

Views

0

Downloads

2

Crossref

3

Web of Science

3

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 04 September 2024
Revised: 10 November 2024
Accepted: 26 November 2024
Published: 28 November 2024
© 2024 Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).