AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (992.4 KB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Identification of sea snake meat adulteration in meat products using PCR-RFLP of mitochondrial DNA

Sunutcha Suntrarachuna( )Lawan ChanhomeaMontri Sumonthab
Queen Saovabha Memorial Institute, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
Ranong Marine Fisheries Station, Ranong 85000, Thailand

Peer review under responsibility of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.

Show Author Information

Abstract

PCR-RFLP based technique for identification of sea snakes in Thai waters was achieved by developing species-specific markers. To distinguish between sea snake species, the PCR products of cytochrome b (Cyt b), 12S and 16S rRNA were sequenced and cut with different restriction endonuclease, Alu I and Hinf I. Each enzyme generated different - sized fragments which specific to Cyt b of eight sea snake species. However, the identical pattern was found among Hydrophis group. This result could be resolved by using these enzymes 12S rRNA digestion. This technique was successfully applied to blood, shed skin, raw meat, cooked meat, sea snake-fish binary admixture, and sea snake-pork binary admixture. Hence, it could be applied for identification when sea snake meat adulteration in meat products and sold as meatballs to reduce production costs. Hopefully, this technique would improve sea snake species identification when morphological examination is no longer possible because the animals are already processed. This is very important to track when sea snake species are being hunted and also used to assess the conservation and management of the sea snakes in Thai waters, especially the Gulf of Thailand.

References

[1]

M.J. Cox, M.F. Hoover, L. Chanhome, K. Thirakhupt, The Snakes of Thailand, first ed., Sirabutr Printing Company, Bangkok, 2012.

[2]

J.S. Keogh, R. Shine, S. Donnellan, Phylogenetic relationships of terrestrial Australo-Papuan elapid snakes (subfamily Hydrophiinae) based on cytochrome b and 16S rRNA sequences, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 10 (1998) 67-81.

[3]

N.V. Cao, N.T. Tao, A. Moore, A. Montoya, A.R. Rasmussen, K. Broad, H.K. Voris, Z. Takacs, Sea snake harvest in the Gulf of Thailand, Conserv. Biol. 28 (2014) 1677-1687.

[4]

C.M. Sheehy III, A. Solorzano, J.B. Pfaller, H.B. Lillywhite, Prelimary insights into the phylogeography of the yellow-bellied sea snake, Pelamis platurus, Integr. Comp. Biol. 52 (2012) 321-330.

[5]

N. Kidera, A. Mori, M.C. Tu, Comparison of freshwater discrimination ability in three species of sea kraits (Laticauda semifasciata, L. laticaudata and L. colubrina), J. Com. Physiol. A: Neuroethol. Sens. Neural Behav. Physiol. 199 (2013) 191-195.

[6]

J.C. Murphy, M.J. Cox, H.K. Voris, A key to the sea snakes in the Gulf of Thailand, Nat. Hist. Bull. Siam Soc. 47 (1999) 95-108.

[7]

C.T. Elfes, S.R. Livingstone, A. Lane, V. Lukosche, K.L. Sanders, A.J. Courtney, J.L. Gatus, M. Guinea, A.S. Lobo, D. Milton, A.R. Rasmussen, M. Read, M.-D. White, J. Sanciangco, A. Alcala, H. Heatwole, D.R. Karns, J.A. Seminoff, H.K. Voris, K.E. Carpenter, J.C. Murphy, Fascinating and forgotten: the conservation status of marine elapid snakes, Herpetol. Conserv. Biol. 8 (2012) 37-52.

[8]

A.T. Tu, Sea snake investigation in the Gulf of Thailand, J. Herpetol 8 (1974) 201-210.

[9]

D.M. Cawthorn, L.C. Hoffman, Controversial cuisine: a global account of the demand, supply and acceptance of “unconventional” and “exotic” meats, Meat Sci. 120 (2016) 19-36.

[10]

A. Doosti, P.G. Dehkordi, R. Ebrahim, Molecular assay to fraud identification of meat products, J. Food Sci. Technol. 51 (2014) 148-152.

[11]

G. Rastogi, M.S. Dharne, S. Walujkar, A. Kumar, M.S. Patole, Y.S. Shouche, Species identification and authentication of tissues of animal origin using mitochondrial and nuclear markers, Meat Sci. 76 (2007) 666-674.

[12]

B. Dubey, P.R. Meganathan, I. Haque, DNA mini-barcoding: an approach for forensic identification of some endangered Indian snake species, Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 5 (2011) 181-184.

[13]

P.S. Girish, A.S.R. Anjaneyulu, K.N. Viswas, M. Anand, N. Rajkumar, B.M. Shivakumar, S. Bhaskar, Sequence analysis of mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene can identify meat species, Meat Sci. 66 (2004) 551-556.

[14]

S. Unajak, P. Meesawat, K. Anyamaneeratch, D. Anuwareepong, K. Srikulnath, K. Choowongkomon, Identification of species (meat and blood samples) using nested PCR analysis of mitochondrial DNA, Afr. J. Biotechnol. 22 (2011) 5670-5676.

[15]

H. Heatwole, Sea Snakes, second ed., Krieger Pub Co., Florida, 1999.

[16]

K.L. Sanders, A.R. Rasmussen, Mumpuni, J. Elmberg, A. de Silva, M.L. Guinea, M.S. Lee, Recent rapid speciation and ecomorph divergence in Indo-Australian sea snakes, Mol. Ecol. 22 (2013) 2742-2759.

[17]

X. Fang, C. Zhang, Detection of adulterated murine components in meat products by TaqMan real-time PCR, Food Chem. 192 (2016) 485-490.

[18]

S. Haunshi, R. Basumatary, P.S. Girish, S. Doley, R.K. Bardoloi, A. Kumar, Identification of chicken, duck, pigeon and pig meat by species-specific markers of mitochondrial origin, Meat Sci. 83 (2009) 454-459.

[19]

M.M. Rahman, M.E. Ali, S.B.A. Hamid, S. Bhassu, S. Mustafa, M.A. Amin, M.A. Razzak, Lab-on-a-chip PCR RFLP assay for the detection of canine DNA in burger formulations, Food Anal. Methods (2015) 10.1007/s12161-015-0090-1.

[20]

A. Arshlan, O.I. Ilhak, M. Calicioglu, Effect of method of cooking on identification of heat processed beef using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique, Meat Sci. 72 (2006) 326-330.

[21]

P.S. Girish, A.S.R. Anjaneyulu, K.N. Viswas, B.M. Shivakumar, M. Anand, M. Patel, B. Sharma, Meat species identification by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) of mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene, Meat Sci. 70 (2005) 107-112.

[22]

B.A. Alimi, Risk factors in street food practices in developing countries: a review, Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 5 (2016) 141-148.

[23]

D. Kumar, S.P. Singh, N.S. Karabasanavar, R. Singh, V. Umapathi, Authentication of beef, carabeef, mutton, and pork by a PCR-RFLP assay of mitochondrial cytb gene, J. Food Sci. Technol. 51 (2014) 3458-3463.

[24]

C.M. Bravi, J.P. Liron, P.M. Mirol, M.V. Ripoli, P. Peral-Garcia, G. Giovambattista, A simple method for domestic animal identification in Argentina using PCR-RFLP analysis of cytochrome b gene, Leg. Med. 6 (2004) 246-251.

[25]

L.P. Wang, R.Q. Geng, Z.Q. Liu, An effective strategy for species identification of avian meats using the mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene fragment, Mini Rev. Organic Chem. 26 (2015) 171-174.

[26]

S. Suntrarachun, L. Chanhome, W. Thaweekarn, M. Sumontha, Molecular identification of venomous snakes in Thailand using PCR-RFLP, Int. J. Pure Appl. Biosci. 2 (2014) 133-138.

Food Science and Human Wellness
Pages 170-174
Cite this article:
Suntrarachun S, Chanhome L, Sumontha M. Identification of sea snake meat adulteration in meat products using PCR-RFLP of mitochondrial DNA. Food Science and Human Wellness, 2018, 7(2): 170-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fshw.2018.04.002

454

Views

4

Downloads

8

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

11

Scopus

0

CSCD

Altmetrics

Received: 27 April 2017
Revised: 15 March 2018
Accepted: 23 April 2018
Published: 18 May 2018
© 2018 “Society information”.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return