AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (8 MB)
Collect
AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Comparison of multiple satellite-derived products for assessing vegetation productivity and evapotranspiration in Nepal: Toward understanding carbon and water coupling in a mountainous region

Jiaxin SongaDecheng Zhoub, ( )Lu HaoaJingfeng XiaocXing LidLiangxia ZhangbGe Sune
Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Carbon Source and Sink, China Meteorological Administration (ECSS-CMA)/Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD), College of Ecology and Applied Meteorology, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
Center for Eco-Environment Restoration of Hainan Province, School of Ecology, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
Earth Systems Research Center, Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA
School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510276, China
Eastern Forest Environmental Threat Assessment Center, Southern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA

Peer review under the responsibility of Editorial Office of Forest Ecosystems.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Mountain ecosystems are highly sensitive to climate change, as they regulate carbon–water dynamics that underpin critical ecosystem services. Satellite remote sensing serves as a powerful tool for large-scale monitoring in mountainous regions where ground-based measurements are scarce. However, it remains unclear how satellite-derived gross primary productivity (GPP) and evapotranspiration (ET) vary with elevation and the magnitude of discrepancies across different datasets. This case study focuses on Nepal to systematically investigate the spatiotemporal consistency of six GPP products (EC-LUE, GOSIF, MODIS, MuSyQ, PML_v2, and VPM) and three ET products (ETMonitor, MODIS, and PML_v2) during 2001–2016, with validation against eddy covariance flux measurements. Our results indicate that no single dataset outperforms others across all elevational gradients. Based on the relatively superior datasets (VPM for GPP and PML_v2 for ET), we reveal a strong elevation dependence of GPP, ET, and water use efficiency (WUE = GPP/ET): The highest multi-year mean values are observed in lowland regions (<200 m), and the greatest interannual variability occurs in midland zones (1,000–3,000 m). Across most datasets, GPP and ET exhibit consistent upward trends, accompanied by a concurrent decline in WUE. Notably, at the pixel scale, only 11.2%, 33.3%, and 0.5% of terrestrial areas show consistent long-term trends in GPP, ET, and WUE, respectively. Such inconsistencies significantly hinder efforts to elucidate carbon–water coupling processes in mountainous ecosystems. Our findings indicate that sustained increases in vegetation productivity may exacerbate hydrological water loss in Nepal, while also underscoring the urgent need for targeted improvements to satellite-derived products.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Forest Ecosystems

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Song J, Zhou D, Hao L, et al. Comparison of multiple satellite-derived products for assessing vegetation productivity and evapotranspiration in Nepal: Toward understanding carbon and water coupling in a mountainous region. Forest Ecosystems, 2026, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fecs.2026.100423

108

Views

1

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 31 July 2025
Revised: 26 December 2025
Accepted: 28 December 2025
Published: 01 April 2026
© 2026 The Authors.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).