AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (4.7 MB)
Collect
AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Black locust under long-term rainfall exclusion treatment changed its drought-resistance strategy to an adventurous pattern that potentially raised the risk of hydraulic damage

Mei-Jun Liua,bLe Changa,bQiu-Wen Chena,cJinhong GuandGuoqing Lia,eSheng Dua,e( )
State Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Desertification Control, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
College of Forestry, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
School of Geographical Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
Key Laboratory of Biodiversity Formation Mechanism and Comprehensive Utilization of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, Qinghai Normal University, Xining 810008, China
Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling 712100, China

Peer review under the responsibility of Editorial Office of Forest Ecosystems.

Show Author Information

Abstract

The mechanism of plant response to water availability is a crucial research area in ecosystem adaptation to dry environments. Global change in precipitation patterns exacerbates drought risks in many regions, necessitating investigations of tree responses to drought. However, compared with seasonal drought events, how water use characteristics respond to long-term rainfall reduction remains poorly characterized. Here, we assessed the effects of multi-year rainfall exclusion treatments (in the 4th and 5th years) on sap flow, canopy conductance (GC), and the response pattern to varying transpiration driving force (vapor pressure deficit (VPD)) and soil moisture conditions in a black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) plantation in the China's Loess Plateau. The experimental platform includes paired plots of a 30% throughfall exclusion treatment and a control within the plantation. The reduction of soil water content (SWC), either as temporal variations or as a result of rainfall exclusion treatment, generally lowered sap flow, GC, and the sensitivity to VPD. The difference in each index between plots was substantially greater than that among temporal variations in SWC within a plot. The trees in the control plot showed strong responses of GC to temporal SWC changes, exhibiting an isohydric behavior. However, those subjected to long-term rainfall exclusion treatment had lower variations in GC and the sensitivity across different SWC, exhibiting an anisohydric behavior under limited water conditions. Additionally, rainfall exclusion treatment decreased basal area (BA) increment but increased water use efficiency (WUE). The transition to anisohydric behavior suggests an adventurous pattern of water use strategy that has risks of hydraulic damage and shoot mortality. These findings provide insights into the different adaptation strategies within a species to diverse intensity and duration of drought conditions, which is crucial for sustainable forest management under climate change conditions.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Forest Ecosystems

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Liu M-J, Chang L, Chen Q-W, et al. Black locust under long-term rainfall exclusion treatment changed its drought-resistance strategy to an adventurous pattern that potentially raised the risk of hydraulic damage. Forest Ecosystems, 2025, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fecs.2025.100380

130

Views

7

Downloads

1

Crossref

1

Web of Science

1

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 12 May 2025
Revised: 12 August 2025
Accepted: 18 August 2025
Published: 01 December 2025
© 2025 The Authors.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).