AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (4.7 MB)
Collect
AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Potential for improved groundwater recharge and dry-season flows through forest landscape restoration on degraded lands in the tropics

L. Adrian Bruijnzeela( )Jorge L. Peña-ArancibiabDouglas Sheilc,dAlan D. ZieglereJun ZhangfBob W. Zwartendijkg,hChristian BirkeliGe SunjYanhui WangkXiaoping Zhangl
Department of Geography, King's College London, London WC2B 4BG, UK
CSIRO Environment, Canberra 2601, Australia
Forest Ecology and Forest Management Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen 6708 PB, the Netherlands
Center for International Forestry Research, Kota Bogor 16115, Indonesia
Andaman Coastal Research Station for Development, Kasetsart University, Ranong 85120, Thailand
Environmental Modelling, Sensing & Analysis, TNO, Petten 1755 LE, the Netherlands
Inholland University of Applied Sciences, Alkmaar 1817 MN, the Netherlands
Hydrology and Environmental Hydraulics Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen 6700 HB, the Netherlands
Department of Geography, University of Costa Rica, San José 11501-2060, Costa Rica
Southern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Durham, NC 27713, USA
Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China
Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A & F University, Yangling 712100, China

Peer review under the responsibility of Editorial Office of Forest Ecosystems.

Show Author Information

Abstract

As interest in tropical forest restoration accelerates, understanding its hydrological implications is increasingly urgent. While concerns persist that reforestation will reduce annual water yields—particularly in drier climates—we highlight conditions under which forest landscape restoration (FLR) can improve seasonal water availability, especially during the dry season. We examine the trade-off between increased vegetation water use ("pumping") and enhanced infiltration and subsurface retention ("sponging") following forestation of degraded lands, the recovery of vegetation's ability to capture "occult" precipitation (fog) in specific coastal and montane settings, and the role of forest cover in enhancing moisture recycling and transport at multiple scales. A pantropical sensitivity analysis shows that in degraded landscapes with deep soils and pronounced rainfall seasonality, infiltration gains following forestation can offset or exceed evaporative losses, thereby supporting groundwater recharge and increasing dry-season flows in approximately 10% of cases, with an additional 8% showing near-neutral (slightly negative) outcomes. These findings challenge the assumption that forestation uniformly reduces water availability and underscore the need to prioritize dry-season flow recovery—rather than annual water yield—as a central hydrological goal of FLR. We call for trans-disciplinary research and long-term monitoring to inform forest restoration strategies, particularly in seasonally dry regions where water scarcity is most acute.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Forest Ecosystems

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Bruijnzeel LA, Peña-Arancibia JL, Sheil D, et al. Potential for improved groundwater recharge and dry-season flows through forest landscape restoration on degraded lands in the tropics. Forest Ecosystems, 2025, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fecs.2025.100376

106

Views

0

Downloads

15

Crossref

10

Web of Science

10

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 14 March 2025
Revised: 20 June 2025
Accepted: 24 July 2025
Published: 01 December 2025
© 2025 The Authors.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).