AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Research | Open Access

Machine learning vs. ADM1: Reliable biogas prediction with minimal data requirements in full-scale plants

Sofia Tisoccoa,bSören Weinrichc,dHenrik Bjarne MøllereAlastair James WardeLiam KilmartinfXinmin Zhana,g,h( )Paul Crossonb
Civil Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Galway, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland
Teagasc Animal and Bioscience Research Department, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Dunsany, C15 PW93, Ireland
Faculty of Energy · Building Services · Environmental Engineering, Münster University of Applied Sciences, Stegerwaldstraße 39, 48565, Steinfurt, Germany
Biochemical Conversion Department, Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum gemeinnützige GmbH, Torgauer Straße 116, Leipzig, 04347, Germany
Department of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, Tjele 8830, Denmark
Electrical and Electronic Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Galway, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland
Ryan Institute, University of Galway, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland
MaREI Research Centre for Energy, Climate and Marine, Ryan Institute, University of Galway, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland
Show Author Information

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion harnesses microbial processes to convert organic wastes into renewable biogas, offering a sustainable pathway for energy production. In agricultural settings, biogas plants often co-digest livestock manure with crop residues, yet seasonal variations in feedstock quality introduce fluctuations that challenge process stability and yield optimization. Mechanistic models such as the Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 (ADM1) provide detailed biochemical simulations but require extensive substrate characterization, limiting their practicality for full-scale operations. Here we show that a simplified ADM1, alongside machine learning approaches—random forest and long short-term memory (LSTM) networks—achieves comparable accuracy in predicting daily biogas and methane production from a full-scale plant over 2023–2024. All models yielded Nash-Sutcliffe efficiencies above 0.78, with random forest excelling when incorporating feedstock quantities and maize silage volatile solids. While LSTM proved effective even with minimal inputs, it incurred a training time 141 times greater than ADM1, highlighting critical trade-offs in computational efficiency. These findings advance hybrid modelling strategies for real-time monitoring, enabling operators to balance predictive precision with data requirements to enhance renewable energy integration and agricultural sustainability.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Environmental Science and Ecotechnology

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Tisocco S, Weinrich S, Møller HB, et al. Machine learning vs. ADM1: Reliable biogas prediction with minimal data requirements in full-scale plants. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, 2026, 29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2026.100662

71

Views

6

Crossref

4

Web of Science

5

Scopus

Received: 03 July 2025
Revised: 23 January 2026
Accepted: 23 January 2026
Published: 01 January 2026
© 2026 The Authors. Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences, Harbin Institute of Technology, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences.

This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).