AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Research | Open Access

OVOCs drive radical cycling and ozone formation in background air

Enyu Xionga,b,cHai Guoc( )Tzung-May Fua,b( )Xiaopu LyudYu WangcBeining ZhoucMen Xiac,e,f,dZhouxing ZoucQi YuancJin YangcKit Ying ShekcJiongkai Chena,bTianci Jianga,bWei Taoa,bAoxing Zhanga,bWang Xianga,bShuncheng Leec,gTao Wangc
State Key Laboratory of Soil Pollution Control and Safety, Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Precision Measurement and Early Warning Technology for Urban Environmental Health Risks, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518055, China
Guangdong Provincial Field Observation and Research Station for Coastal Atmosphere and Climate of the Greater Bay Area, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518055, China
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, 999077, China
Department of Geography, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong SAR, 999077, China
Aerosol and Haze Laboratory, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Soft Matter Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing, 100029, China
Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research, Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, 00014, Finland
Function Hub of Sustainable Energy and Environment, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou), Guangzhou, Guangdong, 511455, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Surface ozone pollution is a critical global environmental challenge driven by the complex, nonlinear photochemical cycling of ROx radicals (OH + HO2 + RO2). Oxygenated volatile organic compounds (OVOCs) are central to these cycles as both radical sources and sinks, yet their quantitative impact on regional radical budgets remains poorly understood due to historical limitations in ambient measurements. This knowledge gap hinders the accurate prediction of persistent ozone exceedances. Here we show that constraining atmospheric models with a broad suite of 23 OVOCs—specifically reactive dicarbonyls—is essential for the accurate simulation of radical chemistry in southern China's background air through comprehensive field observations and photochemical modeling. We find that models constrained with only the three most common OVOCs (formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and acetone) overestimate hydroxyl radical concentrations by 50%–100%, whereas comprehensive constraints align simulations with observations. This discrepancy is caused by complex offsetting errors, including the severe overestimation of isoprene-derived intermediates and the significant underestimation of secondary biacetyl production. Our results reveal that photolysis of the measured OVOCs contributes 49–61% of total ROx production, with species such as methylglyoxal and biacetyl playing unexpectedly dominant roles in driving ozone formation. These findings highlight critical deficiencies in current chemical mechanisms and demonstrate that high-resolution monitoring of reactive OVOC intermediates is vital for developing effective emission control strategies to mitigate persistent regional ozone pollution.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Environmental Science and Ecotechnology

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Xiong E, Guo H, Fu T-M, et al. OVOCs drive radical cycling and ozone formation in background air. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, 2026, 29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2026.100659

167

Views

1

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Received: 08 May 2025
Revised: 11 January 2026
Accepted: 12 January 2026
Published: 01 January 2026
© 2026 The Authors. Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences, Harbin Institute of Technology, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).