AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (6.3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research | Open Access

Toward basin-agnostic well log imputation and anomaly detection via a pre-trained time-series foundation model

Ardiansyah Koeshidayatullaha,b( )Abdulrahman Al-Fakiha,bSanLinn Ismael Kakaa,b
Department of Geosciences, College of Petroleum Engineering and Geosciences, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
Center for Integrative Petroleum Research, College of Petroleum Engineering and Geosciences, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia

Peer review under the responsibility of Editorial Board of Energy Geoscience.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Interpretation of subsurface storage characterization heavily depends on the quality and continuity of well log data. However, missing measurements and anomalous responses are common due to geological heterogeneity, tool limitations, and borehole conditions. Conventional machine learning and deep learning methods, such as Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), have improved data recovery but remain constrained by the need for extensive retraining, labeled data, and basin-specific tuning. In this study, we present a novel application of a pre-trained time-series foundation model, TimeGPT, for well log imputation and anomaly detection that enables zero-shot inference across different basins and lithologies. This work represents one of the first applications of a generative pre-trained transformer GPT-based model to geoscientific time-series data, bridging recent advances in AI foundation modeling with subsurface analytics. We applied and fine-tuned TimeGPT using multi-log datasets (Gamma ray, Deep resistivity, Bulk density, Neutron porosity, and Sonic transit time) from the Groningen gas field in the Netherlands, and validated its performance against conventional machine learning and deep learning benchmarks. The proposed approach achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) between 0.02% and 0.32%, demonstrating a >10% improvement over conventional models and comparable accuracy to advanced architectures such as bidirectional LSTM and Transformers. Moreover, the model attained 93% anomaly detection accuracy using conformal prediction intervals, effectively distinguishing among geological heterogeneity, tool noise, and borehole-related anomalies. The time-series foundation models can generalize well across different geological settings without retraining, enabling basin-agnostic and data-efficient well log analysis. The integration of self-attention mechanisms and conformal uncertainty quantification provides robust, interpretable predictions for real-world reservoir characterization. This work highlights the transformative potential of generative AI in geosciences, advancing well log interpretation toward scalable, low-risk, and foundation-model-driven analytics for the next generation of subsurface intelligence.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Energy Geoscience

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Koeshidayatullah A, Al-Fakih A, Kaka SI. Toward basin-agnostic well log imputation and anomaly detection via a pre-trained time-series foundation model. Energy Geoscience, 2026, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engeos.2026.100536

291

Views

2

Downloads

1

Crossref

1

Web of Science

1

Scopus

Received: 21 September 2025
Revised: 11 December 2025
Accepted: 29 January 2026
Published: 01 April 2026
© 2026 Sinopec Petroleum Exploration and Protection Research Institute.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).