AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (5.5 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research | Open Access

Physics-integrated neural networks for improved mineral volumes and porosity estimation from geophysical well logs

Prasad Pothana( ), Kegang Ling
Department of Energy and Petroleum Engineering, College of Engineering and Mines, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, 58202, ND, USA

Handling editor: Bo Ren

Peer review under the responsibility of Editorial Board of Energy Geoscience.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Accurate estimation of mineralogy from geophysical well logs is crucial for characterizing geological formations, particularly in hydrocarbon exploration, CO2 sequestration, and geothermal energy development. Current techniques, such as multimineral petrophysical analysis, offer details into mineralogical distribution. However, it is inherently time-intensive and demands substantial geological expertise for accurate model evaluation. Furthermore, traditional machine learning techniques often struggle to predict mineralogy accurately and sometimes produce estimations that violate fundamental physical principles. To address this, we present a new approach using Physics-Integrated Neural Networks (PINNs), that combines data-driven learning with domain-specific physical constraints, embedding petrophysical relationships directly into the neural network architecture. This approach enforces that predictions adhere to physical laws. The methodology is applied to the Broom Creek Deep Saline aquifer, a CO2 sequestration site in the Williston Basin, to predict the volumes of key mineral constituents—quartz, dolomite, feldspar, anhydrite, illite—along with porosity. Compared to traditional artificial neural networks (ANN), the PINN approach demonstrates higher accuracy and better generalizability, significantly enhancing predictive performance on unseen well datasets. The average mean error across the three blind wells is 0.123 for ANN and 0.042 for PINN, highlighting the superior accuracy of the PINN approach. This method reduces uncertainties in reservoir characterization by improving the reliability of mineralogy and porosity predictions, providing a more robust tool for decision-making in various subsurface geoscience applications.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Energy Geoscience
Article number: 100410

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Pothana P, Ling K. Physics-integrated neural networks for improved mineral volumes and porosity estimation from geophysical well logs. Energy Geoscience, 2025, 6(2): 100410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engeos.2025.100410

1803

Views

43

Downloads

19

Crossref

17

Web of Science

20

Scopus

Received: 26 November 2024
Revised: 25 January 2025
Accepted: 03 April 2025
Published: 07 August 2025
© 2025 Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute Corporation, SINOPEC.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).