AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (3.2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Minimum-delay opportunity charging scheduling for electricbuses

Dan McCabeaXuegang (Jeff) BanaBalaźs Kulcsárb( )
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195- 2700, USA
Department of Electrical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, SE-412 96, Sweden
Show Author Information

Abstract

Transit agencies that operate battery-electric buses must carefully manage fast-charging infrastructure to extend daily bus range without degrading on-time performance. To support this need, we propose a mixed-integer linear programming model to schedule opportunity charging that minimizes the amount of departure delay in all trips served by electric buses. Our novel approach directly tracks queuing at chargers in order to set and propagate departure delays. Allowing but minimizing delays makes it possible to optimize performance when delays due to traffic conditions and charging needs are inevitable, in contrast with existing methods that require charging to occur during scheduled layover time. To solve the model, we develop two algorithms based on decomposition. The first is an exact solution method based on combinatorial Benders (CB) decomposition, which avoids directly enumerating the model’s logic-based “big M” constraints and their inevitable computational challenges. The second, inspired by the CB approach but more efficient, is a polynomial-time heuristic based on linear programming that we call Select–Sequence–Schedule (3S). Computational experiments on both a simple notional transit network and the real bus system of King County, Washington, USA demonstrate the performance of both methods. The 3S method appears particularly promising for creating good charging schedules quickly at real-world scale.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Communications in Transportation Research
Article number: 100209

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
McCabe D, Ban X(, Kulcsár B. Minimum-delay opportunity charging scheduling for electricbuses. Communications in Transportation Research, 2025, 5(4): 100209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commtr.2025.100209

648

Views

70

Downloads

4

Crossref

4

Web of Science

4

Scopus

Received: 16 January 2025
Revised: 08 April 2025
Accepted: 09 April 2025
Published: 03 October 2025
© 2025 The Authors.

This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).