Journal Home > Volume 2 , Issue 1

As society faces global challenges such as population growth and climate change, rethinking cities is now more imperative than ever. The design of cities can not be abstracted from the design of their mobility systems. Therefore, efficient solutions must be found to transport people and goods throughout the city efficiently and ecologically. An autonomous bicycle-sharing system would combine the most relevant benefits of vehicle-sharing, autonomy, and micro-mobility, increasing the efficiency and convenience of bicycle-sharing systems and incentivizing more people to bike and enjoy their cities in an environmentally friendly way. Due to the novelty of introducing autonomous driving technology into bicycle-sharing systems and their inherent complexity, there is a need to quantify the potential impact of autonomy on fleet performance and user experience. This paper presents the results of an agent-based simulation that provides an in-depth understanding of the fleet behavior of autonomous bicycle-sharing systems in realistic scenarios, including a rebalancing system based on demand prediction. In addition, this work describes the impact of different parameters on system efficiency and service quality. Finally, it quantifies the extent to which an autonomous system would outperform current station-based and dockless bicycle-sharing schemes. The obtained results show that with a fleet size three and a half times smaller than a station-based system and eight times smaller than a dockless system, an autonomous system can improve overall performance and user experience even with no rebalancing.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

On the performance of shared autonomous bicycles: A simulation study

Show Author's information Naroa Coretti Sancheza,1( )Iñigo Martinezb,1Luis Alonso PastoraKent Larsona
MIT Media Lab, Cambridge, MA, USA
University of Navarra, San Sebastian, Spain

1 These authors contributed equally to this work.

Abstract

As society faces global challenges such as population growth and climate change, rethinking cities is now more imperative than ever. The design of cities can not be abstracted from the design of their mobility systems. Therefore, efficient solutions must be found to transport people and goods throughout the city efficiently and ecologically. An autonomous bicycle-sharing system would combine the most relevant benefits of vehicle-sharing, autonomy, and micro-mobility, increasing the efficiency and convenience of bicycle-sharing systems and incentivizing more people to bike and enjoy their cities in an environmentally friendly way. Due to the novelty of introducing autonomous driving technology into bicycle-sharing systems and their inherent complexity, there is a need to quantify the potential impact of autonomy on fleet performance and user experience. This paper presents the results of an agent-based simulation that provides an in-depth understanding of the fleet behavior of autonomous bicycle-sharing systems in realistic scenarios, including a rebalancing system based on demand prediction. In addition, this work describes the impact of different parameters on system efficiency and service quality. Finally, it quantifies the extent to which an autonomous system would outperform current station-based and dockless bicycle-sharing schemes. The obtained results show that with a fleet size three and a half times smaller than a station-based system and eight times smaller than a dockless system, an autonomous system can improve overall performance and user experience even with no rebalancing.

Keywords: Multi-agent systems, Autonomous vehicles, Future mobility, Micro-mobility, Bicycle-sharing systems, Agent-based simulation

References(80)

Agarwal, A., et al., 2018. Design and Development of an Affordable Autonomous Vehicle for Bike Lanes. Ph. D. thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Alessandrini, A., Campagna, A., Site, P.D., Filippi, F., Persia, L., 2015. Automated vehicles and the rethinking of mobility and cities. In: Transportation Research Procedia, 5. SIDT Scientific Seminar, pp. 145–160, 2013.
Alli, G., Formentin, S., Savaresi, S.M., 2010. On the suitability of epacs in urban use. In: IFAC Proceedings, 43, pp. 277–284.
Alonso, L., Zhang, Y.R., Grignard, A., Noyman, A., Sakai, Y., ElKatsha, M., Doorley, R., Larson, K., 2018. Cityscope: a data-driven interactive simulation tool for urban design. use case volpe. In: International Conference on Complex Systems. Springer, pp. 253–261.
Andersen, H., Eng, Y.H., Leong, W.K., Zhang, C., Kong, H.X., Pendleton, S., Ang, M.H., Rus, D., 2016. Autonomous personal mobility scooter for multi-class mobility-ondemand service. In: 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC). IEEE, pp. 1753–1760.

Van den Berg, V.A., Verhoef, E.T., 2016. Autonomous cars and dynamic bottleneck congestion: the effects on capacity, value of time and preference heterogeneity. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 94, 43–60.

Bergerson, J.A., Brandt, A., Cresko, J., Carbajales-Dale, M., MacLean, H.L., Matthews, H.S., McCoy, S., McManus, M., Miller, S.A., Morrow, W.R., et al., 2020. Life cycle assessment of emerging technologies: evaluation techniques at different stages of market and technical maturity. J. Ind. Ecol. 24, 11–25.

Beznos, A., Formal'Sky, A., Gurfinkel, E., Jicharev, D., Lensky, A., Savitsky, K., Tchesalin, L., 1998. Control of autonomous motion of two-wheel bicycle with gyroscopic stabilisation. In: Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No. 98CH36146). IEEE, pp. 2670–2675.

Bhat, C.R., Sardesai, R., 2006. The impact of stop-making and travel time reliability on commute mode choice. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 40, 709–730.

Bluebikes, 2020. Bluebikes system data. URL: https://www.bluebikes.com/system-data.

Boesch, P.M., Ciari, F., Axhausen, K.W., 2016. Autonomous vehicle fleet sizes required to serve different levels of demand. Transport. Res. Rec. 2542, 111–119.

Brodsky, I., 2019. H3: uber's hexagonal hierarchical spatial index. URL: https://eng.uber.com/h3/.

Browning, R.C., Baker, E.A., Herron, J.A., Kram, R., 2006. Effects of obesity and sex on the energetic cost and preferred speed of walking. J. Appl. Physiol. 100, 390–398.

Büttner, J., Mlasowsky, H., Birkholz, T., et al., 2011. Optimising Bike Sharing in European Cities-A Handbook. OBIS project.

Cervero, R., 2017. Mobility niches: jitneys to robo-taxis. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 83, 404–412.

Chen, C.K., Dao, T.S., 2007. Genetic fuzzy control for path-tracking of an autonomous robotic bicycle. J. Syst. Design Dyn. 1, 536–547.

Chen, Y.P., Chan, K.Y., 2020. Designing excitation maneuvers with maximal parameter sensitivity for an x-by-wire autonomous tricycle. In: International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, V11BT11A025.

Christensen, H., Paz, D., Zhang, H., Meyer, D., Xiang, H., Han, Y., Liu, Y., Liang, A., Zhong, Z., Tang, S., 2021. Autonomous vehicles for micro-mobility. Autonomous Intelligent Systems 1, 1–35.

Coretti, N., Martinez, I., Alonso, L., Larson, K., 2022. On the simulation of shared autonomous micro-mobility. Commun. Transport. Res. (COMMTR) (X, XX).
Curran, A., 2008. Translink Public Bike System Feasibility Study. Quay Communications Inc., Vancouver.

Defoort, M., Murakami, T., 2009. Sliding-mode control scheme for an intelligent bicycle. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 56, 3357–3368.

Duarte, F., Ratti, C., 2018. The impact of autonomous vehicles on cities: a review. J. Urban Technol. 25, 3–18.

Fuller, D., Gauvin, L., Kestens, Y., Daniel, M., Fournier, M., Morency, P., Drouin, L., 2013. Impact evaluation of a public bicycle share program on cycling: a case example of BIXI in Montreal, Quebec. Am. J. Publ. Health 103, e85–e92.

Getz, N.H., Marsden, J.E., 1995. Control for an autonomous bicycle. In: Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, pp. 1397–1402.

Greenblatt, J.B., Saxena, S., 2015. Autonomous taxis could greatly reduce greenhouse-gas emissions of us light-duty vehicles. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 860–863.

Grignard, A., Macià, N., Alonso Pastor, L., Noyman, A., Zhang, Y., Larson, K., 2018. Cityscope Andorra: a multi-level interactive and tangible agent-based visualization. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, pp. 1939–1940.

Gu, T., Kim, I., Currie, G., 2019. To be or not to be dockless: empirical analysis of dockless bikeshare development in China. Transport. Res. Pol. Pract. 119, 122–147.

Haddout, S., 2018. A practical application of the geometrical theory on fibered manifolds to an autonomous bicycle motion in mechanical system with nonholonomic constraints. J. Geom. Phys. 123, 495–506.

He, L., Mak, H.Y., Rong, Y., Shen, Z.J.M., 2017. Service region design for urban electric vehicle sharing systems. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 19, 309–327.

Huang, Y., Kockelman, K.M., Garikapati, V., Zhu, L., Young, S., 2021. Use of shared automated vehicles for first-mile last-mile service: micro-simulation of rail-transit connections in austin, Texas. Transport. Res. Rec. 2675, 135–149.

Hwang, C.L., Wu, H.M., Shih, C.L., 2009. Fuzzy sliding-mode underactuated control for autonomous dynamic balance of an electrical bicycle. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 17, 658–670.

International Transport Forum (ITF), 2020. Good to go? Assessing the environmental performance of new mobility corporate partnership board report. Technical report. Int. Transport Forum (ITF).
Iuchi, K., Niki, H., Murakami, T., 2005. Attitude control of bicycle motion by steering angle and variable cog control. In: 31st Annual Conference of IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, 2005. IECON 2005. IEEE, p. 6.

Jensen, P., Rouquier, J.B., Ovtracht, N., Robardet, C., 2010. Characterizing the speed and paths of shared bicycle use in lyon. Transport. Res. Transport Environ. 15, 522–524.

Kabra, A., Belavina, E., Girotra, K., 2020. Bike-share systems: accessibility and availability. Manag. Sci. 66, 3803–3824.

Kaltenbrunner, A., Meza, R., Grivolla, J., Codina, J., Banchs, R., 2010. Urban cycles and mobility patterns: exploring and predicting trends in a bicycle-based public transport system. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 6, 455–466.

Kamga, A., Rachid, A., 1996. Speed, steering angle and path tracking controls for a tricycle robot. In: Proceedings of Joint Conference on Control Applications Intelligent Control and Computer Aided Control System Design. IEEE, pp. 56–61.
Keo, L., Masaki, Y., 2008. Trajectory control for an autonomous bicycle with balancer. In: 2008 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics. IEEE, pp. 676–681.

Keo, L., Yamakita, M., 2011. Control of an autonomous electric bicycle with both steering and balancer controls. Adv. Robot. 25, 1–22.

Kondor, D., Zhang, X., Meghjani, M., Santi, P., Zhao, J., Ratti, C., 2021. Estimating the potential for shared autonomous scooters. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst.
Lark, W., 2012. The Anatomy of an Urban Modular Electric Vehicle: How the Architecture of the CityCar Enhances Personal Mobility and Supporting Industries. Ph. D. thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Lin, J., Chou, T., 2012. A geo-aware and vrp-based public bicycle redistribution system. Int. J. Vehicular Technol. 152–165, 2012.

Lin, L., He, Z., Peeta, S., 2018. Predicting station-level hourly demand in a large-scale bike-sharing network: a graph convolutional neural network approach. Transport. Res. C Emerg. Technol. 97, 258–276.

Lin, M.C.L., 2021. Affordable Autonomous Lightweight Personal Mobility. Ph. D. thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Luo, H., Kou, Z., Zhao, F., Cai, H., 2019. Comparative life cycle assessment of stationbased and dock-less bike sharing systems. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 146, 180–189.

Luo, H., Zhao, F., Chen, W.Q., Cai, H., 2020. Optimizing bike sharing systems from the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions perspective. Transport. Res. C Emerg. Technol. 117, 102705.

Luo, Y., Cai, P., Bera, A., Hsu, D., Lee, W.S., Manocha, D., 2018. Porca: modeling and planning for autonomous driving among many pedestrians. IEEE Rob. Autom. Lett. 3, 3418–3425.

Martin, E., Shaheen, S.A., Lidicker, J., 2010. Impact of carsharing on household vehicle holdings: results from north american shared-use vehicle survey. Transport. Res. Rec. 2143, 150–158.

Martinez, L., Crist, P., 2015. Urban Mobility System Upgrade–How Shared Self-Driving Cars Could Change City Traffic. International Transport Forum, Paris.
Millard-Ball, A., 2005. Car-sharing: where and How it Succeeds, 60.
Mitchell, W.J., Borroni-Bird, C.E., Burns, L.D., 2010. Reinventing the Automobile: Personal Urban Mobility for the 21st Century. MIT press.
Mulky, R.S., Koganti, S., Shahi, S., Liu, K., 2018. Autonomous scooter navigation for people with mobility challenges. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Computing (ICCC). IEEE, pp. 87–90.

Nair, R., Miller-Hooks, E., Hampshire, R.C., Bušić, A., 2013. Large-scale vehicle sharing systems: analysis of vélib. Int. J. Sustain. Transport. 7, 85–106.

Narayanan, S., Chaniotakis, E., Antoniou, C., 2020. Shared autonomous vehicle services: a comprehensive review. Transport. Res. C Emerg. Technol. 111, 255–293.

National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO), 2019. Shared Micromobility in the US.
OpenStreetMap. Planet dump retrieved from. https://planet.osm.org.
Pandey, A., Jha, S., Chakravarty, D., 2017. Modeling and control of an autonomous three wheeled mobile robot with front steer. In: 2017 First IEEE International Conference on Robotic Computing (IRC). IEEE, pp. 136–142.
Rico, A., Sakai, Y., Larson, K., 2020. Jettsen: a mobile sensor fusion platform for city knowledge abstraction. In: Futue Technologies Conference (FTC).

Rodriguez-Rosa, D., Payo-Gutierrez, I., Castillo-Garcia, F.J., Gonzalez-Rodriguez, A., Perez-Juarez, S., 2017. Improving energy efficiency of an autonomous bicycle with adaptive controller design. Sustainability 9, 866.

Sanchez, N.C., Pastor, L.A., Larson, K., 2020. Autonomous bicycles: a new approach to bicycle-sharing systems. In: 2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC). IEEE, pp. 1–6.

Shaheen, S., Guzman, S., 2011. Worldwide bikesharing. Accessories Mag. 1, 22–27

Shaheen, S.A., Guzman, S., Zhang, H., 2010. Bikesharing in europe, the americas, and asia: past, present, and future. Transport. Res. Rec. 2143, 159–167.

Sharma, H.D., Umashankar, N., 2006a. A fuzzy controller design for an autonomous bicycle system. In: 2006 IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Intelligent Systems. IEEE, pp. 1–6.
Sharma, H.D., Umashankar, N., 2006b. A robotic model (robi) of autonomous bicycle system. In: 2006 International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Modelling Control and Automation and International Conference on Intelligent Agents Web Technologies and International Commerce (CIMCA'06). IEEE, 107–107.

Shi, J. g., Si, H., Wu, G., Su, Y., Lan, J., 2018. Critical factors to achieve dockless bikesharing sustainability in China: a stakeholder-oriented network perspective. Sustainability 10, 2090.

Si, H., gang Shi, J., Wu, G., Chen, J., Zhao, X., 2019. Mapping the bike sharing research published from 2010 to 2018: a scientometric review. J. Clean. Prod. 213, 415–427.

Tanaka, Y., Murakami, T., 2004. Self sustaining bicycle robot with steering controller. In: The 8th IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control, 2004. AMC'04. IEEE, pp. 193–197.
Turnwald, A., Liu, S., 2019. Motion planning and experimental validation for an autonomous bicycle. In: IECON 2019-45th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society. IEEE, pp. 3287–3292.
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division, 2019. World Population Prospects: the 2019 Revision (Technical Report. United Nations New York).
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division, 2019. World Urbanization Prospects: the 2018 Revision (Technical Report. United Nations New York).
Ursaki, J., Aultman-Hall, L., et al., 2015. Quantifying the Equity of Bikeshare Access in US Cities. University of Vermont. Transportation Research Center. Technical Report. (No. TRC Report 15-011).
Wang, S., Cui, L., Lai, J., Yang, S., Chen, X., Zheng, Y., Zhang, Z., Jiang, Z.P., 2020. Gain scheduled controller design for balancing an autonomous bicycle. In: 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, pp. 7595–7600.
Wenzelburger, P., Allgower, F., 2020. A first step towards an autonomously driving escooter. In: Proc. 21th IFAC World Congress, pp. 1–4. Berlin.
Yamakita, M., Utano, A., Sekiguchi, K., 2006. Experimental study of automatic control of bicycle with balancer. In: 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, pp. 5606–5611.
Yao, J.W.H., 2019. IDK: an Interaction Development Kit to Design Interactions for Lightweight Autonomous Vehicles. Ph. D. thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Yavin, Y., 1999. Stabilization and control of the motion of an autonomous bicycle by using a rotor for the tilting moment. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 178, 233–243.

Yetkin, H., Kalouche, S., Vernier, M., Colvin, G., Redmill, K., Ozguner, U., 2014. Gyroscopic stabilization of an unmanned bicycle. In: 2014 American Control Conference. IEEE, pp. 4549–4554.
Yetkin, H., Ozguner, U., 2013. Stabilizing control of an autonomous bicycle. In: 2013 9th Asian Control Conference (ASCC). IEEE, pp. 1–6.
Yu, B., Hu, W., Xu, L., Tang, J., Liu, S., Zhu, Y., 2020. Building the computing system for autonomous micromobility vehicles: design constraints and architectural optimizations. In: 2020 53rd Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO). IEEE, pp. 1067–1081.

Zhao, S., Xiong, J., Kim, S.Y., Xu, L., Yan, J., 2020. When bike-sharing crashed in China: a bumpy ride. J. Bus. Strat. 42, 295–303.

Publication history
Copyright
Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 09 March 2022
Revised: 27 April 2022
Accepted: 27 April 2022
Published: 27 May 2022
Issue date: December 2022

Copyright

© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Tsinghua University Press.

Rights and permissions

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return