387
Views
13
Downloads
8
Crossref
4
WoS
9
Scopus
N/A
CSCD
As society faces global challenges such as population growth and climate change, rethinking cities is now more imperative than ever. The design of cities can not be abstracted from the design of their mobility systems. Therefore, efficient solutions must be found to transport people and goods throughout the city efficiently and ecologically. An autonomous bicycle-sharing system would combine the most relevant benefits of vehicle-sharing, autonomy, and micro-mobility, increasing the efficiency and convenience of bicycle-sharing systems and incentivizing more people to bike and enjoy their cities in an environmentally friendly way. Due to the novelty of introducing autonomous driving technology into bicycle-sharing systems and their inherent complexity, there is a need to quantify the potential impact of autonomy on fleet performance and user experience. This paper presents the results of an agent-based simulation that provides an in-depth understanding of the fleet behavior of autonomous bicycle-sharing systems in realistic scenarios, including a rebalancing system based on demand prediction. In addition, this work describes the impact of different parameters on system efficiency and service quality. Finally, it quantifies the extent to which an autonomous system would outperform current station-based and dockless bicycle-sharing schemes. The obtained results show that with a fleet size three and a half times smaller than a station-based system and eight times smaller than a dockless system, an autonomous system can improve overall performance and user experience even with no rebalancing.
As society faces global challenges such as population growth and climate change, rethinking cities is now more imperative than ever. The design of cities can not be abstracted from the design of their mobility systems. Therefore, efficient solutions must be found to transport people and goods throughout the city efficiently and ecologically. An autonomous bicycle-sharing system would combine the most relevant benefits of vehicle-sharing, autonomy, and micro-mobility, increasing the efficiency and convenience of bicycle-sharing systems and incentivizing more people to bike and enjoy their cities in an environmentally friendly way. Due to the novelty of introducing autonomous driving technology into bicycle-sharing systems and their inherent complexity, there is a need to quantify the potential impact of autonomy on fleet performance and user experience. This paper presents the results of an agent-based simulation that provides an in-depth understanding of the fleet behavior of autonomous bicycle-sharing systems in realistic scenarios, including a rebalancing system based on demand prediction. In addition, this work describes the impact of different parameters on system efficiency and service quality. Finally, it quantifies the extent to which an autonomous system would outperform current station-based and dockless bicycle-sharing schemes. The obtained results show that with a fleet size three and a half times smaller than a station-based system and eight times smaller than a dockless system, an autonomous system can improve overall performance and user experience even with no rebalancing.
Van den Berg, V.A., Verhoef, E.T., 2016. Autonomous cars and dynamic bottleneck congestion: the effects on capacity, value of time and preference heterogeneity. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 94, 43–60.
Bergerson, J.A., Brandt, A., Cresko, J., Carbajales-Dale, M., MacLean, H.L., Matthews, H.S., McCoy, S., McManus, M., Miller, S.A., Morrow, W.R., et al., 2020. Life cycle assessment of emerging technologies: evaluation techniques at different stages of market and technical maturity. J. Ind. Ecol. 24, 11–25.
Bhat, C.R., Sardesai, R., 2006. The impact of stop-making and travel time reliability on commute mode choice. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 40, 709–730.
Boesch, P.M., Ciari, F., Axhausen, K.W., 2016. Autonomous vehicle fleet sizes required to serve different levels of demand. Transport. Res. Rec. 2542, 111–119.
Browning, R.C., Baker, E.A., Herron, J.A., Kram, R., 2006. Effects of obesity and sex on the energetic cost and preferred speed of walking. J. Appl. Physiol. 100, 390–398.
Cervero, R., 2017. Mobility niches: jitneys to robo-taxis. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 83, 404–412.
Chen, C.K., Dao, T.S., 2007. Genetic fuzzy control for path-tracking of an autonomous robotic bicycle. J. Syst. Design Dyn. 1, 536–547.
Christensen, H., Paz, D., Zhang, H., Meyer, D., Xiang, H., Han, Y., Liu, Y., Liang, A., Zhong, Z., Tang, S., 2021. Autonomous vehicles for micro-mobility. Autonomous Intelligent Systems 1, 1–35.
Defoort, M., Murakami, T., 2009. Sliding-mode control scheme for an intelligent bicycle. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 56, 3357–3368.
Duarte, F., Ratti, C., 2018. The impact of autonomous vehicles on cities: a review. J. Urban Technol. 25, 3–18.
Fuller, D., Gauvin, L., Kestens, Y., Daniel, M., Fournier, M., Morency, P., Drouin, L., 2013. Impact evaluation of a public bicycle share program on cycling: a case example of BIXI in Montreal, Quebec. Am. J. Publ. Health 103, e85–e92.
Greenblatt, J.B., Saxena, S., 2015. Autonomous taxis could greatly reduce greenhouse-gas emissions of us light-duty vehicles. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 860–863.
Gu, T., Kim, I., Currie, G., 2019. To be or not to be dockless: empirical analysis of dockless bikeshare development in China. Transport. Res. Pol. Pract. 119, 122–147.
Haddout, S., 2018. A practical application of the geometrical theory on fibered manifolds to an autonomous bicycle motion in mechanical system with nonholonomic constraints. J. Geom. Phys. 123, 495–506.
He, L., Mak, H.Y., Rong, Y., Shen, Z.J.M., 2017. Service region design for urban electric vehicle sharing systems. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 19, 309–327.
Huang, Y., Kockelman, K.M., Garikapati, V., Zhu, L., Young, S., 2021. Use of shared automated vehicles for first-mile last-mile service: micro-simulation of rail-transit connections in austin, Texas. Transport. Res. Rec. 2675, 135–149.
Hwang, C.L., Wu, H.M., Shih, C.L., 2009. Fuzzy sliding-mode underactuated control for autonomous dynamic balance of an electrical bicycle. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 17, 658–670.
Jensen, P., Rouquier, J.B., Ovtracht, N., Robardet, C., 2010. Characterizing the speed and paths of shared bicycle use in lyon. Transport. Res. Transport Environ. 15, 522–524.
Kabra, A., Belavina, E., Girotra, K., 2020. Bike-share systems: accessibility and availability. Manag. Sci. 66, 3803–3824.
Kaltenbrunner, A., Meza, R., Grivolla, J., Codina, J., Banchs, R., 2010. Urban cycles and mobility patterns: exploring and predicting trends in a bicycle-based public transport system. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 6, 455–466.
Keo, L., Yamakita, M., 2011. Control of an autonomous electric bicycle with both steering and balancer controls. Adv. Robot. 25, 1–22.
Lin, J., Chou, T., 2012. A geo-aware and vrp-based public bicycle redistribution system. Int. J. Vehicular Technol. 152–165, 2012.
Lin, L., He, Z., Peeta, S., 2018. Predicting station-level hourly demand in a large-scale bike-sharing network: a graph convolutional neural network approach. Transport. Res. C Emerg. Technol. 97, 258–276.
Luo, H., Kou, Z., Zhao, F., Cai, H., 2019. Comparative life cycle assessment of stationbased and dock-less bike sharing systems. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 146, 180–189.
Luo, H., Zhao, F., Chen, W.Q., Cai, H., 2020. Optimizing bike sharing systems from the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions perspective. Transport. Res. C Emerg. Technol. 117, 102705.
Luo, Y., Cai, P., Bera, A., Hsu, D., Lee, W.S., Manocha, D., 2018. Porca: modeling and planning for autonomous driving among many pedestrians. IEEE Rob. Autom. Lett. 3, 3418–3425.
Martin, E., Shaheen, S.A., Lidicker, J., 2010. Impact of carsharing on household vehicle holdings: results from north american shared-use vehicle survey. Transport. Res. Rec. 2143, 150–158.
Nair, R., Miller-Hooks, E., Hampshire, R.C., Bušić, A., 2013. Large-scale vehicle sharing systems: analysis of vélib. Int. J. Sustain. Transport. 7, 85–106.
Narayanan, S., Chaniotakis, E., Antoniou, C., 2020. Shared autonomous vehicle services: a comprehensive review. Transport. Res. C Emerg. Technol. 111, 255–293.
Rodriguez-Rosa, D., Payo-Gutierrez, I., Castillo-Garcia, F.J., Gonzalez-Rodriguez, A., Perez-Juarez, S., 2017. Improving energy efficiency of an autonomous bicycle with adaptive controller design. Sustainability 9, 866.
Shaheen, S.A., Guzman, S., Zhang, H., 2010. Bikesharing in europe, the americas, and asia: past, present, and future. Transport. Res. Rec. 2143, 159–167.
Shi, J. g., Si, H., Wu, G., Su, Y., Lan, J., 2018. Critical factors to achieve dockless bikesharing sustainability in China: a stakeholder-oriented network perspective. Sustainability 10, 2090.
Si, H., gang Shi, J., Wu, G., Chen, J., Zhao, X., 2019. Mapping the bike sharing research published from 2010 to 2018: a scientometric review. J. Clean. Prod. 213, 415–427.
Yavin, Y., 1999. Stabilization and control of the motion of an autonomous bicycle by using a rotor for the tilting moment. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 178, 233–243.
Zhao, S., Xiong, J., Kim, S.Y., Xu, L., Yan, J., 2020. When bike-sharing crashed in China: a bumpy ride. J. Bus. Strat. 42, 295–303.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).