Discover the SciOpen Platform and Achieve Your Research Goals with Ease.
Search articles, authors, keywords, DOl and etc.
The design principle of the cavity-based scramjet combustor is to maximize combustion efficiency while minimizing total pressure loss. An experimental cavity-based scramjet was used as Type Ⅰ-1, while Type Ⅱ-1 was derived by replacing it with a periodic combustor with evenly distributed fuel nozzles. Introducing a bypass channel resulted in Types Ⅰ-2 and Ⅱ-2, whereas arranging wedges and ramps in Type Ⅱ-1 led to Types Ⅱ-3 and Ⅱ-4, respectively. Supersonic combustions in these six configurations were studied using three-dimensional numerical simulations. The results showed that combustion efficiency at the outlet increased by 22.77% in Type Ⅰ-2 compared with Type Ⅰ-1, whereas Types Ⅱ-2, Ⅱ-3, and Ⅱ-4 increased by 18.32%, 12.31%, and -6.94%, respectively, compared with Type Ⅱ-1. Regarding total pressure loss at the outlet, Type Ⅰ-2 decreased by 1.14% compared with Type Ⅰ-1, whereas Types Ⅱ-2, Ⅱ-3, and Ⅱ-4 decreased by 2.42%, 1.46%, and 0.4%, respectively, compared with Type Ⅱ-1. The findings indicate that increasing the upstream low-speed zone, redirecting upstream airflow, and isolating airflow impact can increase the fuel jet’s Penetration Height (PH). Type Ⅰ-2 significantly increased PH through a bypass channel, whereas Type Ⅱ-3 reduced the obstruction of the fuel jets to the airflow entering the cavity through wedges, allowing oxygen-rich airflow into the cavity and maintaining combustion at the lower boundary of the fuel jets. Types Ⅰ-2 and Ⅱ-2 achieved significant bypass airflow, establishing a combustion zone near the wall downstream of the cavity and significantly reducing the temperature of the wall downstream. The results confirm that using bypass airflow to promote cavity-based scramjet combustion is a feasible approach. The shock wave structure in the scramjet combustor remains the primary contributor to total pressure loss, highlighting the importance of designing scramjet combustors with weaker shock waves.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Comments on this article