AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Open Access

Internal surface finishing and roughness measurement: A critical review

Jiang GUOa( )Qikai LIaPu QINaAnkang YUANaMingyang LUaXiaolong KEbYicha ZHANGcBenny C.F. CHEUNGd
State Key Laboratory of High-performance Precision Manufacturing, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen 361024, China
Laboratoire d’Automatique de Mécanique et d’Informatique industrielles et Humaines, UMR 8201, CNRS, INSA Hauts-de-France, Univ. Polytechnique Hauts-de-France, 59313, Valenciennes, France
State Key Laboratory of Ultra-precision Machining Technology, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA

Show Author Information

Abstract

Modern industrial equipment is increasingly characterized by miniaturization, integration, and high performance, necessitating the production of complex structural parts with exceptionally high internal surface quality. Direct manufacturing often leads to high internal surface roughness, which traditional finishing and measuring methods cannot adequately address due to the decreasing size and increasing complexity of internal structures. This is especially true for components like pipes with large aspect ratios, extremely small deep holes, multi-stage bends, cross pipes, and array holes. To meet the high-performance manufacturing demands of these parts, advanced internal surface finishing and roughness measurement technologies have gained significant attention. This review focuses on the challenges and solutions related to internal surface parts with various apertures and complex structures. Internal surface finishing methods are categorized into mechanical finishing, fluid-based finishing, and energy-field-based finishing based on their characteristics. Roughness measurement technologies are divided into tool-probing and non-probing methods. The principles, required equipment, and key parameters of each finishing and measurement approach are discussed in detail. Additionally, the advantages and limitations of these methods are summarized, and future trends are forecasted. This paper serves as a comprehensive guide for researchers and engineers aiming to enhance the internal surface quality of complex structure parts.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Chinese Journal of Aeronautics

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
GUO J, LI Q, QIN P, et al. Internal surface finishing and roughness measurement: A critical review. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2025, 38(8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2024.11.013

473

Views

17

Crossref

16

Web of Science

19

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 27 July 2024
Revised: 25 August 2024
Accepted: 06 November 2024
Published: 17 November 2024
© 2024 The Author(s). Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).