AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

Aerodynamic analysis of rotor-to-rotor interactions in different octocopter configurations

Aqib AZIZYongjie SHI( )Yang LIUGuohua XU
National Key Laboratory of Rotorcraft Aeromechanics, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA

Show Author Information

Abstract

Rotor-to-rotor interaction among neighboring rotors of a multirotor has great significance for aerodynamically efficient multirotor design. Current research is conducted to analyze aerodynamic performance of different octocopter configurations amid hover and forward flight. Conventional and coaxial configurations are studied and a hybrid configuration is also proposed to rectify the disadvantages associated with the earlier two. Comparison is carried out for the aforementioned configurations along with comparison of coaxial and hybrid octocopters with bigger diameter rotors in the same confined space for high thrust requirement missions. Vertical spacing of coaxial configuration is also studied. Virtual Blade Method (VBM) is considered herein due to its great computational efficiency. The results show that there are 11.89% and 14.22% loss in thrust for coaxial octocopter compared to conventional and hybrid configurations with normal size rotors and 15.61% loss compared to hybrid configuration with bigger rotors in hover, whereas coaxial square configuration performs the worst in forward flight with a lift loss of 9.1%, 14.77% and 18.8% compared to coaxial diamond, conventional and hybrid configurations with normal size rotors and 9.96% and 17.82% loss compared to coaxial diamond and hybrid configurations with bigger rotors. Combined FM shows that hybrid configuration outperforms other octocopter configurations in overall aerodynamic performance.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Chinese Journal of Aeronautics

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
AZIZ A, SHI Y, LIU Y, et al. Aerodynamic analysis of rotor-to-rotor interactions in different octocopter configurations. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2025, 38(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2024.09.042

782

Views

6

Crossref

3

Web of Science

4

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 28 February 2024
Revised: 15 April 2024
Accepted: 02 June 2024
Published: 02 October 2024
© 2024 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).