AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

Assessment of advanced RANS turbulence models for prediction of complex flows in compressors

China Academy of Aerospace Science and Innovation, Beijing 100176,China

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) has been widely used in compressor design and analysis. However, reasonable prediction of compressor flow and its impact on compressor performance remains challenging. In this study, Menter’s Shear Stress Transport (SST) model and its variants, as well as the ω-based Reynolds stress model (Stress-BSL) are assessed. For a single rotor (Rotor 67), under the peak efficiency operating condition, all studied turbulence models predict its performance with reasonable accuracy; under the off-design conditions, SST with Helicity correction (SST-Helicity) shows superiority in predicting the effect of flow on the spanwise distribution of aerodynamic parameters. For Darmstadt’s 1.5-stage transonic axial compressor, SST-Helicity outperforms SST, SST with the Quadratic Constitutive Relation (SST-QCR) and Stress-BSL in predicting the performance as well as the spanwise distribution of aerodynamic parameters. At the design rotating speed, the stall margin given by SST-Helicity (20.90%) is the closest to the experimental measurement (24.81%), which is more than twice that by SST (8.71%) and 1.5 times that by SST-QCR (14.14%). This paper demonstrates that SST-Helicity model, together with a good quality and sufficiently refined grid, can capture the compressor flow features with reasonable accuracy, which results in a credible prediction of compressor performance and stage matching.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Pages 162-177

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
SUN W. Assessment of advanced RANS turbulence models for prediction of complex flows in compressors. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2023, 36(9): 162-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2023.06.007

1109

Views

39

Crossref

36

Web of Science

41

Scopus

6

CSCD

Received: 31 August 2022
Revised: 26 September 2022
Accepted: 17 October 2022
Published: 22 June 2023
© 2023 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).