AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

Uncertainty analysis of turbulence model in capturing flows involving laminarization and retransition

Hongkang LIUa,b,c, Shishang ZHANGa,b,c, Yong ZOUa,b,c, Wu YUANd, Tanghong LIUa,b,c, Yatian ZHAOe( )
Key Laboratory of Traffic Safety on Track of Ministry of Education, School of Traffic & Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
Joint International Research Laboratory of Key Technology for Rail Traffic Safety, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
National & Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Safety Technology for Rail Vehicle, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
Computer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Flows experiencing laminarization and retransition are universal and crucial in many engineering applications. The objective of this study is to conduct an uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis of turbulence model closure coefficients in capturing laminarization and retransition for a rapidly contracting channel flow. Specifically, two commonly used turbulence models are considered: the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) one-equation model and the Menter Shear Stress Transport (SST) two-equation model. Thereby, a series of steady Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) predictions of aero-engine intake acceleration scenarios are carried out with the purposely designed turbulence model closure coefficients. As a result, both SA and SST models fail to capture the retransition phenomenon though they achieve pretty good performance in laminarization. Using the non-intrusive polynomial chaos method, solution uncertainties in velocity, pressure, and surface friction are quantified and analyzed, which reveals that the SST model possesses much great uncertainty in the non-laminar regime, especially for the logarithmic law prediction. Besides, a sensitivity analysis is performed to identify the critical contributors to the solution uncertainty, and then the correlations between the closure coefficients and the deviations of the outputs of interest are obtained via the linear regression method. The results indicate that the diffusion-related constants are the dominant uncertainty contributors for both SA and SST models. Furthermore, the remarkably strong correlation between the critical closure coefficients and the outputs might be a good guide to recalibrate and even optimize the commonly used turbulence models.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Pages 148-164

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
LIU H, ZHANG S, ZOU Y, et al. Uncertainty analysis of turbulence model in capturing flows involving laminarization and retransition. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2022, 35(10): 148-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2022.06.017

637

Views

23

Crossref

22

Web of Science

21

Scopus

5

CSCD

Received: 04 January 2022
Revised: 09 February 2022
Accepted: 24 March 2022
Published: 27 June 2022
© 2022 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).