AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Full Length Article | Open Access

Revisiting the space-time gradient method: A time-clocking perspective, high order difference time discretization and comparison with the harmonic balance method

Boqian WANGa, Dingxi WANGa, Mohammad RAHMATIb, Xiuquan HUANGa( )
School of Power and Energy, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China
Department of Mechanical and Construction Engineering, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, United Kingdom

Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA.

Show Author Information

Abstract

This paper revisits the Space-Time Gradient (STG) method which was developed for efficient analysis of unsteady flows due to rotor–stator interaction and presents the method from an alternative time-clocking perspective. The STG method requires reordering of blade passages according to their relative clocking positions with respect to blades of an adjacent blade row. As the space-clocking is linked to an equivalent time-clocking, the passage reordering can be performed according to the alternative time-clocking. With the time-clocking perspective, unsteady flow solutions from different passages of the same blade row are mapped to flow solutions of the same passage at different time instants or phase angles. Accordingly, the time derivative of the unsteady flow equation is discretized in time directly, which is more natural than transforming the time derivative to a spatial one as with the original STG method. To improve the solution accuracy, a ninth order difference scheme has been investigated for discretizing the time derivative. To achieve a stable solution for the high order scheme, the implicit solution method of Lower-Upper Symmetric Gauss-Seidel/Gauss-Seidel (LU-SGS/GS) has been employed. The NASA Stage 35 and its blade-count-reduced variant are used to demonstrate the validity of the time-clocking based passage reordering and the advantages of the high order difference scheme for the STG method. Results from an existing harmonic balance flow solver are also provided to contrast the two methods in terms of solution stability and computational cost.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Pages 45-58

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
WANG B, WANG D, RAHMATI M, et al. Revisiting the space-time gradient method: A time-clocking perspective, high order difference time discretization and comparison with the harmonic balance method. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2022, 35(11): 45-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2022.05.016

606

Views

6

Crossref

5

Web of Science

5

Scopus

2

CSCD

Received: 27 September 2021
Revised: 21 October 2021
Accepted: 27 October 2021
Published: 06 June 2022
© 2022 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).