AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (2.4 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Review | Open Access

Biological nitrogen and carbon fixation: Bridging the gap between synthetic symbioses and synthetic biology

Qi Chenga( )Chukang MaaXuelu Wangb( )
College of Life Sciences and State Key Laboratory of North China Crop Improvement and Regulation, Hebei Agricultural University, 2596 Lekai South Street, Baoding 071001, Hebei, China
State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Adaptation and Improvement, School of Life Sciences, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, Henan, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) and photosynthetic carbon fixation underpin food production and climate mitigation, yet natural systems are constrained by oxygen sensitivity, high energy demand, and inefficient catalysts. This review synthesizes advances that recast these processes as engineering targets and proposes a conceptual roadmap that bridges synthetic symbioses with the synthetic biology of enzymes and pathways. For BNF, progress spans cross-kingdom strategies—from refactoring nif gene sets and targeting nitrogenase assembly to eukaryotic organelles, to engineering plant-associated diazotrophs, rhizosphere control circuits, and emerging nodule-like microenvironments. For carbon assimilation, new-to-nature CO2-fixation modules and photorespiratory bypasses illustrate how pathway redesign and alternative carboxylases can circumvent key Calvin–Benson–Bassham limitations, and expanding photosynthetic light capture offers additional leverage. Across these domains, we extract common design principles: (ⅰ) nitrogenase output is increasingly governed by carbon/energy supply and electron delivery as much as by oxygen protection; (ⅱ) robust function requires compartment-aware enzyme–chassis coordination, substrate channeling, and dynamic regulation using sensors and control circuits; and (ⅲ) scalable implementation may benefit from distributing metabolic labor across engineered consortia rather than forcing all functions into a single host. We discuss enabling technologies—including AI-guided protein design and directed evolution, cell-free prototyping, chassis toolkits, and materials/bioelectrochemical interfaces—that can accelerate design–build–test–learn cycles and reduce barriers to deployment. Together, these insights define a path toward integrated nitrogen and carbon fixation systems for low-emission agriculture and biomanufacturing.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
The Crop Journal
Pages 74-86

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Cheng Q, Ma C, Wang X. Biological nitrogen and carbon fixation: Bridging the gap between synthetic symbioses and synthetic biology. The Crop Journal, 2026, 14(1): 74-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2026.01.002

1511

Views

11

Downloads

21

Crossref

17

Web of Science

17

Scopus

1

CSCD

Received: 03 December 2025
Revised: 04 January 2026
Accepted: 30 January 2026
Published: 03 February 2026
© 2025 Crop Science Society of China and Institute of Crop Science, CAAS.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).