AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Short Communication | Open Access

Genetic transformation and genome editing in wild soybean (Glycine soja)

Li Chena,bMeng Tanga,bWeiwei Yaoa,bWensheng Houa,b( )Yupeng Caia,b( )
State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
Ministry of Agriculture Key Laboratory of Soybean Biology (Beijing), Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
Show Author Information

Abstract

Soybean (Glycine max), a key food and oilseed crop, is derived from wild soybean (Glycine soja). Compared with cultivated varieties, wild soybean exhibits significantly higher genetic diversity, harboring stress-tolerance genes, broad-spectrum disease-resistance genes, and superior alleles that regulate seed nutrition, which were lost during domestication. These genetic resources have remained “visible yet underutilized”, primarily due to the lack of mature transformation and gene editing systems. In this study, we established stable genetic transformation and gene editing systems for Glycine soja. We identified three major bottlenecks to the genetic transformation of Glycine soja: its thick, rigid seed coat impairs water absorption and germination; its Agrobacterium infection efficiency is low; and regenerated shoots exhibit severe chlorosis and death. To address these issues, we employed 1) seed coat sandpaper abrasion enables wild soybean seeds to absorb water and germinate within 1 d; 2) sonication at 45 kHz for 60 s, which increased the Agrobacterium infection rate from 11.76% to 55.26%; and 3) supplementation of the culture media with an additional 12 mg L−1 ferrous sulfate and 30 mg L−1 disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), which alleviated chlorosis in regenerated shoots. The transformation efficiencies of two wild soybean accessions reached 1.54% and 6.33%, with stable transgene heritability. We targeted GsDELLA and successfully generated homozygous mutants, which displayed reduced plant height and branch number. We extended this approach to 19 elite soybean cultivars, obtaining positive transformants, with higher transformation efficiencies for late-maturing (MG I–VI; typically > 10%) than early-maturing (MG 00–I; 2%–10%) varieties. Our versatile transformation platform should accelerate the genetic improvement of both wild and cultivated soybean germplasm.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
The Crop Journal
Pages 684-689

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Chen L, Tang M, Yao W, et al. Genetic transformation and genome editing in wild soybean (Glycine soja). The Crop Journal, 2026, 14(2): 684-689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2025.12.003

186

Views

2

Downloads

3

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 29 September 2025
Revised: 23 December 2025
Accepted: 23 December 2025
Published: 09 January 2026
© 2026 Crop Science Society of China and Institute of Crop Science, CAAS.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).