AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.2 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research paper | Open Access

Genetic gains with genomic versus phenotypic selection for drought and waterlogging tolerance in tropical maize (Zea mays L.)

Reshmi Rani Dasa, Madhumal Thayil Vinayana, Kaliyamoorthy Seetharama, Manish Patelb, Ramesh Kumar Phagnac, Shyam Bir Singhc, Jai Prakash Shahid, Akashi Sarmae, Nagendra Sarma Baruae, Raman Babua, Pervez Haider Zaidia( )
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), ICRISAT Campus, Patancheru 502324, Hyderabad, India
Main Maize Research Station, Anand Agriculture University, Anand 388001, Gujarat, India
ICAR-Indian Institute of Maize Research, Ludhiana141001, Bihar, India
Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, Uttar Pradesh, India
Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat 785013, Assam, India
Show Author Information

Abstract

Erratic rainfall often results in intermittent drought and/or waterlogging and limits maize (Zea mays L.) productivity in many parts of the Asian tropics. Developing climate-resilient maize germplasm possessing tolerance to these key abiotic stresses without a yield penalty under optimal growing conditions is a challenge for breeders working in stress-vulnerable agro-ecologies in the region. Breeding stress-resilient maize for rainfed stress-prone ecologies is identified as one of the priority areas for CIMMYT-Asia maize program. We applied rapid cycle genomic selection (RCGS) on two multiparent yellow synthetic populations (MYS-1 and MYS-2) to improve grain yield simultaneously under drought and waterlogging conditions using genomic-estimated breeding values (GEBVs). Also, the populations were simultaneously advanced using recurrent phenotypic selection (PS) by exposing them to managed drought and waterlogging and intermating tolerant plants from the two selection environments. Selection cycles per se (C1, C2, and C3) of the two populations developed using RCGS and PS approach and their test-cross progenies were evaluated separately in multilocation trials under managed drought, waterlogging, and optimal moisture conditions. Significant genetic gains were observed with both GS and PS, except with PS in MYS-2 under drought and with GS in MYS-1 under waterlogging. Realized genetic gains from GS were relatively higher under drought conditions (110 and 135 kg ha−1 year−1) compared to waterlogging (38 and 113 kg ha−1 year−1) in both MYS-1 and MYS-2, respectively. However, under waterlogging stress PS showed at par or better than GS as gain per year with PS was 80 and 90 kg ha−1, whereas with GS it was 90 and 43 kg ha−1 for MYS-1 and MYS-2, respectively. Our findings suggested that careful constitution of a multiparent population by involving trait donors for targeted stresses, along with elite high-yielding parents from diverse genetic background, and its improvement using RCGS is an effective breeding approach to build multiple stress tolerance without compromising yield when tested under optimal conditions

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
The Crop Journal
Pages 1438-1448

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Das RR, Vinayan MT, Seetharam K, et al. Genetic gains with genomic versus phenotypic selection for drought and waterlogging tolerance in tropical maize (Zea mays L.). The Crop Journal, 2021, 9(6): 1438-1448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2021.03.012

919

Views

14

Downloads

21

Crossref

12

Web of Science

19

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 26 November 2020
Revised: 22 February 2021
Accepted: 28 March 2021
Published: 21 April 2021
© 2021 Crop Science Society of China and Institute of Crop Science, CAAS.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).