AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (1.8 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research paper | Open Access

Agronomic performance of drought-resistance rice cultivars grown under alternate wetting and drying irrigation management in southeast China

Guang Chu1Tingting Chen1Song ChenChunmei XuDanying Wang( )Xiufu Zhang( )
China National Rice Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310006, Zhejiang, China

1 Guang Chu and Tingting Chen contributed equally to this work.

Peer review under responsibility of Crop Science Society of China and Institute of Crop Science, CAAS.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Compared to drought-susceptible rice cultivars (DSRs), drought-resistance rice cultivars (DRRs) could drastically reduce the amount of irrigation water input and simultaneously result in higher grain yield under water-saving irrigation conditions. However, the mechanisms underlying these properties are unclear. We investigated how improved agronomic traits contribute to higher yield and higher water use efficiency (WUE) in DRRs than in DSRs under alternate wetting and drying (AWD). Two DRRs and two DSRs were field-grown in 2015 and 2016 using two different irrigation regimes: continuous flooding (CF) and AWD. Under CF, no statistical differences in grain yield and WUE were observed between DRRs and DSRs. Irrigation water under the AWD regime was 275–349 mm, an amount 49.8%–56.2% of that (552–620 mm) applied under the CF regime. Compared to CF, AWD significantly decreased grain yield in both DRRs and DSRs, with a more significant reduction in DSRs, and WUE was increased in DRRs, but not in DSRs, by 9.9%–23.0% under AWD. Under AWD, DRRs showed a 20.2%–26.2% increase in grain yield and an 18.6%–24.5% increase in WUE compared to DSRs. Compared to DSRs, DRRs showed less redundant vegetative growth, greater sink capacity, higher grain filling efficiency, larger root biomass, and deeper root distribution under AWD. We conclude that these improved agronomic traits exert positive influences on WUE in DRRs under AWD.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
The Crop Journal
Pages 482-494

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Chu G, Chen T, Chen S, et al. Agronomic performance of drought-resistance rice cultivars grown under alternate wetting and drying irrigation management in southeast China. The Crop Journal, 2018, 6(5): 482-494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2018.04.005

756

Views

7

Downloads

43

Crossref

N/A

Web of Science

45

Scopus

10

CSCD

Received: 31 January 2018
Revised: 30 March 2018
Accepted: 14 April 2018
Published: 07 June 2018
© 2018 Crop Science Society of China and Institute of Crop Science, CAAS.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).