AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (9.6 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Research | Open Access

Life cycle assessment of recycling delithiated β spodumene as a raw material in the built environment

He ZhouaThomas PouletbWen LicHakan BasarirdElhem GhorbeleAli Karrecha( )
School of Engineering, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia
CSIRO Mineral Resource, Kensington, WA, 6151, Australia
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3052, Australia
Department of Geoscience, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Høgskoleringen 1, Trondheim, 7034, Norway
Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Cergy-Pontoise, Neuville-sur-Oise, 95000, France
Show Author Information

Abstract

The demand for lithium is continuously rising as it is a key element in the construction of greener future energy storage systems. However, large amounts of delithiated β spodumene (DβS) are generated during the lithium extraction process from spodumene, which raises environmental concerns. Concurrently, the acquisition of raw materials for concrete production contributes significantly to CO2 emissions and the generation of other pollutants, highlighting the opportunity to integrate DβS into sustainable concrete production. In this study, we consider DβS recycling as a cement or fine aggregate replacement material. A life cycle assessment (LCA) was performed to evaluate the environmental impact of Australian averaged standard strength concrete production and DβS recycling technologies, assessing various replacement scenarios involving cement (10%, 20%, and 25%) or sand (30% and 50%) with DβS. The results indicate that replacing cement with DβS comprehensively reduces the environmental footprint of concrete production. However, sand replacement is not recommended due to higher environmental burdens. The application of the rail shipping method for DβS recycling would increase the environmental impacts of concrete production compared with the coastal method. In addition, the evaluation of the Australian average transport distance can reflect the Australian condition with negligible error compared with localized conditions. Furthermore, the greenhouse gas emission reduction by replacing cement with DβS is satisfactory and comparable to that observed with other mineral processing by-products.

Graphical Abstract

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
cec-5-3-100210_ESM.docx (131.3 KB)

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Circular Economy
Article number: 100210

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Zhou H, Poulet T, Li W, et al. Life cycle assessment of recycling delithiated β spodumene as a raw material in the built environment. Circular Economy, 2026, 5(3): 100210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cec.2026.100210

4

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

Received: 07 May 2025
Revised: 31 March 2026
Accepted: 24 April 2026
Published: 11 June 2026
© 2026 The Author(s).

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).