AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
Article Link
Collect
Submit Manuscript
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Original Research | Open Access

Advancing circular economy in Amazonian forest management: A comparative study of the effects of wood waste segregation and traditional carbonization on charcoal properties, combustibility, and spontaneous combustion risk

Denes de Souza Barrosa, Michael Douglas Roque Limaa,b, Jonas Massuquec, Elvis Vieira dos Santosd, Bruna Duque Guirardie, Ananias Francisco Dias Juniorf, Lina Bufalinoa, Edgar A. Silveirag( ), Angélica de Cássia Oliveira Carneiroe, Paulo Fernando Trugilhod, Thiago de Paula Protásiod,h
Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Federal Rural University of Amazonia (UFRA), Belém 66077-901, Brazil
Agricultural Sciences Center, State University of the Tocantina Region of Maranhão (UEMASUL), Imperatriz, Imperatriz 65900-001, Brazil
Faculty of Agrarian Sciences, Lúrio University, Sanga District 3300, Mozambique
Department of Forest Science, Federal University of Lavras (UFLA), Lavras 37203-202, Brazil
Department of Forest Engineering, Federal University of Viçosa (UFV), Viçosa 36570-900, Brazil
Wood and Forestry Science Department, Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES), Jerȏnimo Monteiro 29550-000, Brazil
Mechanical Sciences Graduate Program, Laboratory of Energy and Environment, University of Brasília (UnB), Distrito Federal 70910-900, Brazil
Department of Forest Science, Federal Rural University of Amazonia (UFRA), Parauapebas 68515-000, Brazil
Show Author Information

Abstract

This study integrates legal timber harvesting, conservation efforts, and circular economy concepts in Amazonia by converting wood waste into charcoal via real-scale kilns in remote regions. Emphasizing the benefits of species-based segregation, residues from 23 tropical species were classified via principal component analysis into four distinct Groups (G1—G4), whereas G5 represented traditional mixed-species carbonization. A novel approach was used to assess the impact of species-based segregation on charcoal quality, combustion behavior, and logistical safety (spontaneous combustion risk) through proximate and calorific analyses, thermogravimetric analysis, combustion indices, and self-combustion experiments. To support the selection of high-performance and safer biofuels, multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) was applied to systematically rank charcoal groups by integrating physicochemical and thermal performance indicators. The segregated groups exhibited variations in fixed carbon (69.61—73.92%, dry basis (db)), volatile matter (21.87—27.58%, db), ash content (1.20—6.03%, db), and higher heating value (26.5—30.0 MJ·kg−1). G1 (Dinizia excelsa) had the highest fixed carbon content, lowest ash content, and superior combustion behavior, whereas G5 had a lower ignition temperature and greater reactivity. Spontaneous combustion tests revealed no self-ignition in G1 and G4, whereas G2, G3, and G5 presented incidence rates of 75%, 50%, and 25%, respectively. MCDA enables a robust, multi-indicator evaluation of charcoal performance, producing a ranking (G1 > G4 > G5 > G3 > G2) that is consistent with the spontaneous combustion results. These findings highlight the potential of selective biomass utilization to produce higher-quality, safer, and more sustainable charcoal, reinforcing its role in circular bioenergy systems in the Amazon.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Download File(s)
cec-4-3-100152_ESM.docx (957.8 KB)

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Circular Economy
Article number: 100152

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
de Souza Barros D, Lima MDR, Massuque J, et al. Advancing circular economy in Amazonian forest management: A comparative study of the effects of wood waste segregation and traditional carbonization on charcoal properties, combustibility, and spontaneous combustion risk. Circular Economy, 2025, 4(3): 100152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cec.2025.100152

1221

Views

3

Crossref

5

Web of Science

5

Scopus

Received: 30 December 2024
Revised: 03 April 2025
Accepted: 29 April 2025
Published: 08 July 2025
© 2025 The Author(s).

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).