Journal Home > Volume 2 , Issue 3

The introduction of design for the circular economy (DfCE) in the electronics industry can strongly build on the earlier experiences in the field of applied ecodesign. Although the design methodology DfCE as such is identical compared to traditional ecodesign, DfCE needs different metrics because it includes apart from the environmental dimension also supply criticality and recyclability. Such metrics are proposed in the present paper. These will allow to come to prioritized action agendas for DfCE. Moreover, the numbers will allow to position the actions appropriately in the internal and external value chains. The basis for such metrics is to assign to each individual material in a product a weight based resource factor (RF). Such RFs include ‘factors’ for supply criticality, environmental load and recyclability. This allows to calculate ‘consolidated’ RFs for products as well. This approach will very effective in promoting circularity, because it starts from its core. That is: looking to how (and why) specific materials are applied and using a numerical method to put this into perspective. Primarily this is helpful to address the internal value chain. Also supply side issues and demand side issues (consumers) will get a lot of attention in this paper, both at the front side (design) and the back side (discarding behaviour of users). The combination of both aspects will allow to come to develop the best strategies for reuse for different product groups. For the informal sector application of the metrics is still premature, but in future there could be contributions as well. In the discussion section, issues are raised as regards possible contradictions between resource issues and emission issues and about conflicts of interest between DfCE and business interest in more general. Moreover, attention is paid to the way DfCE can contribute to enrich traditional ecodesign.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

The challenge of introducing design for the circular economy in the electronics industry: A proposal for metrics

Show Author's information Ab Stevels,1( )
Design for Sustainability Lab, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands

1 Present address: Herinkhave 3-5655JL, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.

Abstract

The introduction of design for the circular economy (DfCE) in the electronics industry can strongly build on the earlier experiences in the field of applied ecodesign. Although the design methodology DfCE as such is identical compared to traditional ecodesign, DfCE needs different metrics because it includes apart from the environmental dimension also supply criticality and recyclability. Such metrics are proposed in the present paper. These will allow to come to prioritized action agendas for DfCE. Moreover, the numbers will allow to position the actions appropriately in the internal and external value chains. The basis for such metrics is to assign to each individual material in a product a weight based resource factor (RF). Such RFs include ‘factors’ for supply criticality, environmental load and recyclability. This allows to calculate ‘consolidated’ RFs for products as well. This approach will very effective in promoting circularity, because it starts from its core. That is: looking to how (and why) specific materials are applied and using a numerical method to put this into perspective. Primarily this is helpful to address the internal value chain. Also supply side issues and demand side issues (consumers) will get a lot of attention in this paper, both at the front side (design) and the back side (discarding behaviour of users). The combination of both aspects will allow to come to develop the best strategies for reuse for different product groups. For the informal sector application of the metrics is still premature, but in future there could be contributions as well. In the discussion section, issues are raised as regards possible contradictions between resource issues and emission issues and about conflicts of interest between DfCE and business interest in more general. Moreover, attention is paid to the way DfCE can contribute to enrich traditional ecodesign.

Keywords: Reuse, Design, Circular economy, Recycling systems

References(20)

Agema, R., Hoedemaker, E., & Stevels, A. (2007). ‘Green’ marketing and communication. In A. Stevels (Ed.), Adventures in EcoDesign of electronic products: 1993-2007. The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology.
Brezet, H., Rombouts, J., & Stevels, A. (2007). Factor methods and lifecycle analysis. In A. Stevels (Ed.), Adventures in EcoDesign of electronic products: 1993-2007. The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology.
Cramer, J. M., & Stevels, A. (2007). The first wave of ecodesign. In A. Stevels (Ed.), Adventures in EcoDesign of electronic products: 1993-2007. The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology.
European Union. (2017). 2017 list of critical raw materials for the EU. Communication, 2017. F1-EN.
Goedkoop, M., & Spriensma, R. (2001). The Ecoindicator 99: A damage oriented method for life cycle impacts: Methodology report. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247848113.
Griese, H., Müller, J., & Sietmann, R. (1997). Kreislaufwirtschaft in der Elektronik industrie: Konzepte, strategien, Umweltökonomie. Berlin, German: VDE-Verlag (In Germany).
Huisman, J., Boks, C. B., & Stevels, A. (2007a). Quotes for environmentally weighted recyclability (QWERTY). In A. Stevels (Ed.), Adventures in EcoDesign of electronic products: 1993-2007. The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology.
Huisman, J., Stevels, A., Baldé, C. P., Magalini, F., & Kuehr, R. (2019). The e-waste development cycle, Parts Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ and Ⅳ. In Ⅴ. Goodship, A. Stevels, & J. Huisman (Eds.), Waste Electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) handbook. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing.
Huisman, J., van der Maesen, M., Eijsbouts, R. J. J., Wang, F., Baldé, C. P., & Wielinga, C. A. (2012). The Dutch WEEE flows. Bonn, Germany: United Nations University ISP-SCYCLE.
Ishii, K., & Stevels, A. (2007). The value chain. In A. Stevels (Ed.), Adventures in EcoDesign of electronic products: 1993-2007. The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology.
Jansen, A. J., & Stevels, A. (2007). Environmental benchmarking. In A. Stevels (Ed.), Adventures in EcoDesign of electronic products: 1993-2007. The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology.
Pascual, O., & Stevels, A. (2007). Ecodesign and packaging & transport. In A. Stevels (Ed.), Adventures in EcoDesign of electronic products: 1993-2007. The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology.
Rose, C. M., Ishii, K., & Stevels, A. (2007). Making reuse/recycling strategies for products. In A. Stevels (Ed.), Adventures in EcoDesign of electronic products: 1993-2007. The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology.
Stevels, A. (2007a). Adventures in EcoDesign of electronic products: 1993-2007. The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology.
Stevels, A. (2007b). Integration into processes. In A. Stevels (Ed.), Adventures in EcoDesign of electronic products: 1993-2007. The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology.
Stevels, A. (2016). The reverse perspective, fifteen years of EcoDesign at Philips consumer electronics (1993-2008). Retrieved from http://self.gutenberg.org/.
Stevels, A. (2017). The reverse perspective, fifteen year of EcoDesign at Philips consumer electronics (1993-2008), Part Ⅱ. Retrieved from http://self.gutenberg.org/.
Stevels, A. (2018). Design for resource value. In M. Charter (Ed.), Designing for the circular economy. London: Routledge.
DOI
van Nes, C. N., Cramer, J. M., & Stevels, A. (2007). Product lifetime and life time extension. In A. Stevels (Ed.), Adventures in EcoDesign of electronic products: 1993-2007. The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology.

Wang, F., Huisman, J., Meskers, C. E. M., Schluep, M., Stevels, A., & Hagelüken, C. (2012). The Best-of-2-Worlds philosophy: Developing local dismantling and global infrastructure network for sustainable e-waste treatment in emerging economies. Waste Management, 32, 2134-2146.

Publication history
Copyright
Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 15 May 2023
Revised: 21 August 2023
Accepted: 21 August 2023
Published: 09 September 2023
Issue date: September 2023

Copyright

© 2023 The Author(s).

Rights and permissions

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return