AI Chat Paper
Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AMiner AI. SciOpen does not take any responsibility related to this content.
{{lang === 'zh_CN' ? '文章概述' : 'Summary'}}
{{lang === 'en_US' ? '中' : 'Eng'}}
Chat more with AI
PDF (3.3 MB)
Collect
Submit Manuscript AI Chat Paper
Show Outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Outline
Show full outline
Hide outline
Research Article | Open Access

Patterns and drivers of waterbird alpha and beta diversity are different between arid and humid regions of China

Zhuoen Liu1Jinlei Zhang1Tingjia ZhaoWenjian SongLu WenQing ZhangGang Feng ( )
Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Ecology and Resource Use of the Mongolian Plateau & Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecology, School of Ecology and Environment, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, 010020, China

1 These authors contributed equally to this work.

Peer review under the responsibility of Editorial Office of Avian Research.

Show Author Information

Abstract

Waterbirds are vital for wetland ecosystems, but climate change and human activities are harming these habitats globally, reducing biodiversity and threatening waterbird survival. In China, wetlands in humid and arid regions face quite different threats, necessitating targeted conservation strategies. However, few studies have assessed the relative roles of various drivers in determining geographical patterns of alpha and beta diversity of wetland waterbirds in different regions, particularly from the perspectives of taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity. This study aims to connect climate and landscape variables with waterbirds diversity in 71 wetlands across China's humid and arid regions. The results showed that mean annual temperature was negatively associated with taxonomic diversity but positively correlated with phylogenetic structure. Phylogenetic and functional diversity was significantly associated with paleoclimate change. Additionally, patch richness was positively correlated with taxonomic diversity and functional structure, but negatively correlated with phylogenetic diversity and structure. Notably, taxonomic and phylogenetic beta diversity was dominated by turnover, while functional beta diversity was dominated by nestedness-resultant components. Total edge and patch density were significantly correlated with waterbird beta diversity. In addition, arid regions showed higher turnover in taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity compared to humid regions. Compared to arid regions, humid regions had consistently higher nestedness-resultant components in the three diversity dimensions and higher turnover in functional beta diversity. These findings indicated that while climate variables are important for waterbird diversity patterns, wetland's landscape characteristics could also play significant roles. In addition, conservation of Chinese wetland bird diversity should consider unique strategies for different biodiversity dimensions as well as for different regions.

References

【1】
【1】
 
 
Avian Research

{{item.num}}

Comments on this article

Go to comment

< Back to all reports

Review Status: {{reviewData.commendedNum}} Commended , {{reviewData.revisionRequiredNum}} Revision Required , {{reviewData.notCommendedNum}} Not Commended Under Peer Review

Review Comment

Close
Close
Cite this article:
Liu Z, Zhang J, Zhao T, et al. Patterns and drivers of waterbird alpha and beta diversity are different between arid and humid regions of China. Avian Research, 2026, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avrs.2026.100339

7

Views

0

Downloads

0

Crossref

0

Web of Science

0

Scopus

0

CSCD

Received: 11 June 2025
Revised: 29 December 2025
Accepted: 06 January 2026
Published: 07 January 2026
© 2026 The Authors.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).