Journal Home > Volume 14 , Issue 4

The aim of this study was to correlate plumage variation with the amount of genomic hybrid content in hybrids between Azure Tits Cyanistes cyanus (Pallas, 1770) and European Blue Tit Cyanistes caeruleus (Linnaeus, 1758), by re-sequencing the genomes of museum specimens of non-hybrids and presumed hybrids with varying plumages. The project was funded by crowdsourcing and initiated when two presumed Azure Tits, observed by hundreds of Swedish birdwatchers, were rejected as hybrids based on minor plumage deviations assumed to indicate hybrid contents from the European Blue Tit. The results confirm that hybrids with intermediate plumages, so called Pleske's Tits, are first generation hybrids (F1 hybrids). Individuals, whose plumages are similar to Azure Tits, but assessed as hybrids based on minor plumage deviations, are all backcrosses but vary in their degree of hybrid content. However, some individuals morphologically recognized as pure Azure Tits expressed similar degrees of hybrid content. The results indicate that: (1) hybrid content may be widespread in Azure Tits in the western part of its habitat distribution; (2) plumage deviation in backcrosses is not linearly correlated with the genetic degree of hybrid origin; and (3) all Azure Tits observed in Europe outside its natural distribution may have some degree of hybrid origin. We therefore suggest that it is very difficult to phenotypically single out hybrids beyond first generation backcrosses. We argue that decreased sequencing costs and improved analytical tools open the doors for museomic crowd-sourced projects that may not address outstanding biological questions but have a major interest for lay citizens such as birdwatchers.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

A crowd-sourced genomic project to assess hybrid content in a rare avian vagrant (Azure Tit Cyanistes cyanus (Pallas, 1770))

Show Author's information Martin Irestedta( )Filip Thörna,bPer G.P. EricsonaHein van GrouwcYaroslav A. Red'kind,eAlexander HellquistfFrank JohanssongJohan A.A. Nylandera
Department of Bioinformatics and Genetics, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden
Department of Zoology Stockholm University, Sweden
Bird Group, Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Tring, United Kingdom
Zoological Museum, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
Institute of Biological Problems of Cryolithozone SB RAS, Yakutsk, Russia
Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Sweden
Department of Ecology and Genetics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

Abstract

The aim of this study was to correlate plumage variation with the amount of genomic hybrid content in hybrids between Azure Tits Cyanistes cyanus (Pallas, 1770) and European Blue Tit Cyanistes caeruleus (Linnaeus, 1758), by re-sequencing the genomes of museum specimens of non-hybrids and presumed hybrids with varying plumages. The project was funded by crowdsourcing and initiated when two presumed Azure Tits, observed by hundreds of Swedish birdwatchers, were rejected as hybrids based on minor plumage deviations assumed to indicate hybrid contents from the European Blue Tit. The results confirm that hybrids with intermediate plumages, so called Pleske's Tits, are first generation hybrids (F1 hybrids). Individuals, whose plumages are similar to Azure Tits, but assessed as hybrids based on minor plumage deviations, are all backcrosses but vary in their degree of hybrid content. However, some individuals morphologically recognized as pure Azure Tits expressed similar degrees of hybrid content. The results indicate that: (1) hybrid content may be widespread in Azure Tits in the western part of its habitat distribution; (2) plumage deviation in backcrosses is not linearly correlated with the genetic degree of hybrid origin; and (3) all Azure Tits observed in Europe outside its natural distribution may have some degree of hybrid origin. We therefore suggest that it is very difficult to phenotypically single out hybrids beyond first generation backcrosses. We argue that decreased sequencing costs and improved analytical tools open the doors for museomic crowd-sourced projects that may not address outstanding biological questions but have a major interest for lay citizens such as birdwatchers.

Keywords: Crowdsourcing, Hybridization, Cyanistes cyanus, Museomics

References(59)

Abbott, R., Albach, D., Ansell, S., Arntzen, J.W., Baird, S.J.E., Bierne, N., et al., 2013. Hybridization and speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 26, 229–246.

Andersen, M.J., McCullough, J.M., Gyllenhaal, E.F., Mapel, X.M., Haryoko, T., Jonsson, K.A., et al., 2021. Complex histories of gene flow and a mitochondrial capture event in a nonsister pair of birds. Mol. Ecol. 30, 2087–2103.

Bi, K., Linderoth, T., Vanderpool, D., Good, J.M., Nielsen, R., Moritz, C., 2013. Unlocking the vault: next-generation museum population genomics. Mol. Ecol. 22, 6018–6032.

Brelsford, A., Toews, D.P.L., Irwin, D.E., 2017. Admixture mapping in a hybrid zone reveals loci associated with avian feather coloration. Proc. R. Soc. B 284, 20171106.

Buckley, T.R., Cordeiro, M., Marshall, D.C., Simon, C., 2006. Differentiating between hypotheses of lineage sorting and introgression in New Zealand alpine cicadas (Maoricicada Dugdale). Syst. Biol. 55, 411–425.

Chen, S., Zhou, Y., Chen, Y., Gu, J., 2018. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34, i884–i890.

Corell, M., Edman, A., Eriksson, A., Hellquist, A., Larsson, H., Malmhagen, B., et al., 2019. Så greppar RK hybriderna. Var. Fagelvarld 1, 37–39.

Dasmahapatra, K.K., Walters, J.R., Briscoe, A.D., Davey, J.W., Whibley, A., Nadeau, N.J., et al., 2012. Butterfly genome reveals promiscuous exchange of mimicry adaptations among species. Nature 487, 94–98.

del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A., Christie, D., Caley, K., 2007. Handbook of the Birds of the World. Volume 12. Picathartes to Tits and Chickadees. In: Lynx Edicions, Barcelona.
Dementiev, G.P., Gladkov, N.A., 1954. Birds of the Soviet Union. State Publishers, "Soviet Science", Moscow.

Di Tommaso, P., Chatzou, M., Floden, E.W., Barja, P.P., Palumbo, E., Notredame, C., 2017. Nextflow enables reproducible computational workflows. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 316–319.

Duckworth, W.D., Genoways, H.H., Rose, C.L., 1993. Preserving Natural Science Collections: Chronicle of Our Environmental Heritage. National Institute for the Conservation of Cultural Property, Inc, Washington, DC.

Dussex, N., von Seth, J., Robertson, B.C., Dalen, L., 2018. Full mitogenomes in the Critically Endangered Kakapo reveal major post-glacial and anthropogenic effects on neutral genetic diversity. Genes 9, 220.

Feder, J.L., Xie, X.F., Rull, J., Velez, S., Forbes, A., Leung, B., et al., 2005. Mayr, Dobzhansky, and Bush and the complexities of sympatric speciation in Rhagoletis. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 6573–6580.

Fish and Wildlife Service, 2018. 2016 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and WildlifeAssociated Recreation. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington.
Frankel, D., 2011. The Big Year, 20th Century Fox. Amazon, United States.

Gooddie, C., 2013. The Jewel Hunter. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

DOI

Haldane, J.B.S., 1922. Sex ratio and unisexual sterility in hybrid animals. J. Genet. 12, 101–109.

Harrap, S., Quinn, D., 1991. Tits, Nuthatches and Treecreepers: an Identification Guide. Christopher Helm.

Hedrick, P.W., 2013. Adaptive introgression in animals: examples and comparison to new mutation and standing variation as sources of adaptive variation. Mol. Ecol. 22, 4606–4618.

Holder, M.T., Anderson, J.A., Holloway, A.K., 2001. Difficulties in detecting hybridization. Syst. Biol. 50, 978–982.

Illera, J.C., Koivula, K., Broggi, J., Packert, M., Martens, J., Kvist, L., 2011. A multi-gene approach reveals a complex evolutionary history in the Cyanistes species group. Mol. Ecol. 20, 4123–4139.

Irestedt, M., Thorn, F., Muller, I.A., Jonsson, K.A., Ericson, P.G.P., Blom, M.P.K., 2022. A guide to avian museomics: Insights gained from resequencing hundreds of avian study skins. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 22, 2672–2684.

Katoh, K., Standley, D.M., 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780.

Kaufman, K., 2006. Kingbird Highway: the Biggest Year in the Life of an Extreme Birder. Houghton Mifflin, New York.

Knapp, M., Thomas, J.E., Haile, J., Prost, S., Ho, S.Y.W., Dussex, N., et al., 2019. Mitogenomic evidence of close relationships between New Zealand's extinct giant raptors and small-sized Australian sister-taxa. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 134, 122–128.

Korneliussen, T.S., Albrechtsen, A., Nielsen, R., 2014. ANGSD: analysis of next generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinf. 15, 356.

Kozlov, A.M., Darriba, D., Flouri, T., Morel, B., Stamatakis, A., 2019. RAxML-NG: a fast, scalable and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics 35, 4453–4455.

Kvist, L., Broggi, J., Illera, J.C., Koivula, K., 2005. Colonisation and diversification of the blue tits (Parus caeruleus teneriffae-group) in the Canary Islands. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 34, 501–511.

Lamichhaney, S., Berglund, J., Almen, M.S., Maqbool, K., Grabherr, M., Martinez-Barrio, A., et al., 2015. Evolution of Darwin's finches and their beaks revealed by genome sequencing. Nature 518, 371–375.

Lawicki, L., 2012. Azure Tits and hybrids Azure × European Blue Tit in Europe. Dutch Bird. 34, 219–231.

Li, H., Handsaker, B., Wysoker, A., Fennell, T., Ruan, J., Homer, N., et al., 2009. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079.

Maheshwari, S., Barbash, D.A., 2011. The genetics of hybrid incompatibilities. Annu. Rev. Genet. 45, 331–355.

Marques, D.A., Lucek, K., Sousa, V.C., Excoffier, L., Seehausen, O., 2019. Admixture between old lineages facilitated contemporary ecological speciation in Lake Constance stickleback. Nat. Commun. 10, 4240.

Martin, J.L., 1991. The Parus-Caeruleus complex revisited. Ardea 79, 429–438.

Maváres, J., Linares, M., 2008. Homoploid hybrid speciation in animals. Mol. Ecol. 17, 4181–4185.

McCarthy, E.M., 2006. Handbook of Avian Hybrids of the World. Oxford University Press, New York.

McCormack, J.E., Tsai, W.L.E., Faircloth, B.C., 2016. Sequence capture of ultraconserved elements from bird museum specimens. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 16, 1189–1203.

Meier, J.I., Marques, D.A., Mwaiko, S., Wagner, C.E., Excoffier, L., Seehausen, O., 2017. Ancient hybridization fuels rapid cichlid fish adaptive radiations. Nat. Commun. 8, 14363.

Meisner, J., Albrechtsen, A., 2018. Inferring population structure and admixture proportions in low-depth NGS data. Genetics 210, 719–731.

Meyer, M., Kircher, M., 2010. Illumina sequencing library preparation for highly multiplexed target capture and sequencing. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2010,, pdb.prot5448.

Murray, G.G.R., Soares, A.E.R., Novak, B.J., Schaefer, N.K., Cahill, J.A., Baker, A.J., et al., 2017. Natural selection shaped the rise and fall of passenger pigeon genomic diversity. Science 358, 951–954.

Natola, L., Billerman, S.M., Carling, M.D., Seneviratne, S.S., Irwin, D., 2022. Geographic variability of hybridization between red-breasted and red-naped sapsuckers. Evolution 77, 580–592.

bmascik, M., 2011. The Big Year: A Tale of Man, Nature, and Fowl Obsession. Atria Books.
Oddie, B., 1980. Bill Oddie's Little Black Bird Book. Eyre Methuen.

Ottenburghs, J., Ydenberg, R.C., van Hooft, P., van Wieren, S.E., Prins, H.H.T., 2015. The Avian Hybrids Project: gathering the scientific literature on avian hybridization. Ibis 157, 892–894.

Penalba, J.V., Peters, J.L., Joseph, L., 2022. Sustained plumage divergence despite weak genomic differentiation and broad sympatry in sister species of Australian woodswallows (Artamus spp). Mol. Ecol. 31, 5060–5073.

Picard Toolkit, 2019. Broad Institute, GitHub Repository. Cambridge.

Pleske, T., 1912. Zur Lösung der Frage, ob Cyanistes pleskei Cab. eine selbständige Art darstellt, oder für einen Bastard von Cyanistes coeruleus (Linn.) und Cyanistes cyanus (Pall.) angesprochen werden muß. J. Ornithol. 60, 96–109.

Poelstra, J.W., Vijay, N., Bossu, C.M., Lantz, H., Ryll, B., Muller, I., et al., 2014. The genomic landscape underlying phenotypic integrity in the face of gene flow in crows. Science 344, 1410–1414.

Roux, C., Fraisse, C., Romiguier, J., Anciaux, Y., Galtier, N., Bierne, N., 2016. Shedding light on the grey zone of speciation along a continuum of genomic divergence. PLoS Biol. 14, e2000234.

Sangster, G., 2009. Increasing numbers of bird species result from taxonomic progress, not taxonomic inflation. Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 3185–3191.

Schubert, M., Lindgreen, S., Orlando, L., 2016. AdapterRemoval v2: rapid adapter trimming, identification, and read merging. BMC Res. Notes 9, 88.

Schumer, M., Rosenthal, G.G., Andolfatto, P., 2014. How common is homoploid hybrid speciation? Evolution 68, 1553–1560.

Seehausen, O., 2004. Hybridization and adaptive radiation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 198–207.

Toews, D.P.L., Taylor, S.A., Vallender, R., Brelsford, A., Butcher, B.G., Messer, P.W., et al., 2016. Plumage genes and little else distinguish the genomes of hybridizing warblers. Curr. Biol. 26, 2313–2318.

Tsai, W.L.E., Schedl, M.E., Maley, J.M., McCormack, J.E., 2020. More than skin and bones: Comparing extraction methods and alternative sources of DNA from avian museum specimens. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 20, 1220–1227.

Wang, S., Rohwer, S., de Zwaan, D.R., Toews, D.P.L., Lovette, I.J., Mackenzie, J., et al., 2020. Selection on a small genomic region underpins differentiation in multiple color traits between two warbler species. Evol. Lett. 4, 502–515.

Yates, J.A.F., Lamnidis, T.C., Borry, M., Valtuena, A.A., Fagernas, Z., Clayton, S., et al., 2021. Reproducible, portable, and efficient ancient genome reconstruction with nf-core/eager. PeerJ 9, e10947.

Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements
Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 09 May 2023
Revised: 07 August 2023
Accepted: 22 August 2023
Published: 26 August 2023
Issue date: December 2023

Copyright

© 2023 The Authors.

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements

This study was only possible thanks to the generous financial support from keen birdwatchers and they are all acknowledged. A special thank goes to Sören Sahlin whose generous contribution was critical for the project. We are also grateful to Club300's former and current president Yvonne Blombäck and Martin Alexandersson and the editorial staff at magazine Roadrunner (Magnus Corell and Hans Bister) for helping us with advertising and practicalities with this crowd-sourcing project. We are grateful to the following Natural history Museums that generously have contributed samples to this study: the Natural History Museum, Tring (Hein van Grouw and Mark Adams); the Burke Museum, Seattle (Sharon Birks); Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm (Ulf Johansson) and Zoological Museum of Moscow University (Pavel Tomkovich). The authors acknowledge support from the National Genomics Infrastructure in Stockholm funded by Science for Life Laboratory, the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation and the Swedish Research Council, and SNIC/Uppsala Multidisciplinary Center for Advanced Computational Science for assistance with massively parallel sequencing and access to the UPPMAX computational infrastructure. MI acknowledge financial support from the Swedish research council (2019-03900) and Riksmusei vänner.

Rights and permissions

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return