Journal Home > Volume 14 , Issue 3
Avian Research 2023, 14(3): 100116 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avrs.2023.100116
Research Article | Open Access | Issue | Published: 03 July 2023

Large-brained birds lay smaller but heavier clutches

Show Author's Information Shaobin Li( ),  Xiaoman Liu,  Guopan Li,  Xiaolong Du
College of Life Science, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, 40025, China
Keywords:
Comparative analysis, Clutch size, Trade-off, Egg mass, Brain size, Breeding attempts, Reproduction investment
Cite this article:
Li S, Liu X, Li G, et al. Large-brained birds lay smaller but heavier clutches. Avian Research, 2023, 14(3): 100116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avrs.2023.100116
Download citation
EndNote(RIS)
BibTeX

242

Views

8

Downloads

Citations

1

Crossref

1

WoS

1

Scopus

0

CSCD

Abstract Full text About this article

The brain is among the most energetically costly organs in vertebrates, and thus trade-offs have been hypothesized to exert constraints on brain size evolution. The energy trade-off hypothesis (ETH) predicts that reducing the energy consumption of reproduction or other costly tissues should compensate for the cost of a large brain. Egg production in birds requires a large proportion of the total energy budget, and a clutch mass in some bird species can outweigh the body mass of the female. To date, this hypothesis has mainly been tested in mammals and ectothermic animals such as anurans and fishes. We collated data on adult brain size, body mass and egg-production traits such as clutch size, egg mass and annual broods from published studies, and conducted a phylogenetic comparative test of the interplay between egg-production investment and brain size evolution across bird species. After controlling for phylogenetic relationships and body size, we find a negative correlation between brain size and clutch size across 1395 species, which favored ETH. However, when egg mass was integrated in models, positive associations were detected between brain size and mass of eggs (via egg mass, clutch mass and annual total egg mass). Our results suggest that brain size trades off against egg-production only via certain aspects (e.g., clutch size). By contrast, a positive relationship between brain size and total egg reproduction (e.g., clutch mass and annual total egg mass) implied increased total energy budget outweighing energy allocation across bird species. Our study shows that there is no general energy trade-off between brain size and egg-reproduction investment, and suggests that brain size evolution follows mixed strategies across bird species.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

Large-brained birds lay smaller but heavier clutches

Show Author's information Shaobin Li( ), Xiaoman Liu, Guopan Li, Xiaolong Du
College of Life Science, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, 40025, China

Abstract

The brain is among the most energetically costly organs in vertebrates, and thus trade-offs have been hypothesized to exert constraints on brain size evolution. The energy trade-off hypothesis (ETH) predicts that reducing the energy consumption of reproduction or other costly tissues should compensate for the cost of a large brain. Egg production in birds requires a large proportion of the total energy budget, and a clutch mass in some bird species can outweigh the body mass of the female. To date, this hypothesis has mainly been tested in mammals and ectothermic animals such as anurans and fishes. We collated data on adult brain size, body mass and egg-production traits such as clutch size, egg mass and annual broods from published studies, and conducted a phylogenetic comparative test of the interplay between egg-production investment and brain size evolution across bird species. After controlling for phylogenetic relationships and body size, we find a negative correlation between brain size and clutch size across 1395 species, which favored ETH. However, when egg mass was integrated in models, positive associations were detected between brain size and mass of eggs (via egg mass, clutch mass and annual total egg mass). Our results suggest that brain size trades off against egg-production only via certain aspects (e.g., clutch size). By contrast, a positive relationship between brain size and total egg reproduction (e.g., clutch mass and annual total egg mass) implied increased total energy budget outweighing energy allocation across bird species. Our study shows that there is no general energy trade-off between brain size and egg-reproduction investment, and suggests that brain size evolution follows mixed strategies across bird species.

Keywords: Comparative analysis, Clutch size, Trade-off, Egg mass, Brain size, Breeding attempts, Reproduction investment

References(57)

Agrawal, A.A., Conner, J.K., Rasmann, S., 2010. Tradeoffs and negative correlations in evolutionary ecology. In: Bell, M.A., Futuyma, D.J., Eanes, W.F., Levinton, J.S. (Eds.), Evolution Since Darwin: the First 150 Years. Sinauer, Sunderland MA, pp. 243–268.

Aiello, L.C., Wheeler, P., 1995. The expensive-tissue hypothesis: the brain and the digestive system in human and primate evolution. Curr. Anthropol. 36, 199–221.
DOI Google Scholar
Allman, J., 2000. Evolving Brains. Scientific American Library, New York.

Barrickman, N.L., Bastian, M.L., Isler, K., van Schaik, C.P., 2008. Life history costs and benefits of encephalization: a comparative test using data from long-term studies of primates in the wild. J. Hum. Evol. 54, 568–590.
DOI Google Scholar

Barton, R.A., Capellini, I., 2011. Maternal investment, life histories, and the costs of brain growth in mammals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 6169–6174.
DOI Google Scholar

Benson-Amram, S., Dantzer, B., Stricker, G., Swanson, E.M., Holekamp, K.E., 2016. Brain size predicts problem-solving ability in mammalian carnivores. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, 2532–2537.
DOI Google Scholar

Blackburn, T.M., 1991. An interspecific relationship between egg size and clutch size in birds. Auk 108, 973–977.
Google Scholar

Chen, M., Li, G., Liu, J., Li, S., 2021. Large brain size is associated with low extra-pair paternity across bird species. Ecol. Evol. 11, 13601–13608.
DOI Google Scholar
Deaner, R.O., Barton, R.A., van Schaik, C.P., 2003. Primate brains and life histories: renewing the connection. In: Kappeler, P.M., Pereira, M.E. (Eds.), Primate Life Histories and Socioecology. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 233–265.
del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A., Sargatal, J., 1992–2011. Handbook of the Birds of the World, vols. 1–16. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona Spain.

Felsenstein, J., 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125, 1–15.
DOI Google Scholar

Figuerola, J., Green, A.J., 2005. A comparative study of egg mass and clutch size in the Anseriformes. J. Ornithol. 147, 57–68.
DOI Google Scholar

Freckleton, R.P., 2002. On the misuse of residuals in ecology: regression of residuals vs. multiple regression. J. Anim. Ecol. 71, 542–545.
DOI Google Scholar

Garamszegi, L.Z., Eens, M., Erritzøe, J., Møller, A.P., 2005. Sperm competition and sexually size dimorphic brains in birds. Proc. R. Soc. A B 272, 159–166.
DOI Google Scholar

Gonzalez-Voyer, A., González-Suárez, M., Vilà, C., Revilla, E., 2016. Larger brain size indirectly increases vulnerability to extinction in mammals. Evolution 70, 1364–1375.
DOI Google Scholar

Griesser, M., Drobniak, S.M., Graber, S.M., van Schaik, C.P., 2023. Parental provisioning drives brain size in birds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 120, e2121467120.
DOI Google Scholar

Hackett, S.J., Kimball, R.T., Reddy, S., Bowie, R.C.K., Braun, E.L., 2008. A phylogenomic study of birds reveals their evolutionary history. Science 320, 1763–1768.
DOI Google Scholar

Harvey, P.H., Pagel, M.D., 1991. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Houle, D., 1991. Genetic covariance of fitness correlates: what genetic correlations are made of and why it matters. Evolution 45, 630–648.
DOI Google Scholar

Isler, K., van Schaik, C., 2006. Costs of encephalization: the energy trade-off hypothesis tested on birds. J. Hum. Evol. 51, 228–243.
DOI Google Scholar

Isler, K., van Schaik, C., 2014. How human evolved larger brains: comparative evidence. Evol. Anthropol. 23, 65–75.
DOI Google Scholar

Isler, K., van Schaik, C., 2009. The expensive brain: a framework for explaining evolutionary changes in brain size. J. Hum. Evol. 57, 392–400.
DOI Google Scholar

Iwaniuk, A.N., Nelson, J.E., 2003. Developmental differences are correlated with relative brain size in birds: a comparative analysis. Can. J. Zool. 81, 1913–1928.
DOI Google Scholar

Jetz, W., Sekercioglu, C.H., Bö hning-Gaese, K., 2008. The worldwide variation in avian clutch size across species and space. PLoS Biol. 6, e303.
DOI Google Scholar

Jetz, W., Thomas, G.H., Joy, J.B., Hartmann, K., Mooers, A.O., 2012. The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature 491, 444–448.
DOI Google Scholar

Jiménez-Ortega, D., Kolm, N., Immler, S., Maklakov, A.A., GonzalezVoyer, A., 2020. Long life evolves in large brained bird lineages. Evolution 74, 2617–2628.
DOI Google Scholar

Karasov, W.H., Pinshow, B., Starck, J.M., Afik, D., 2004. Anatomical and histological changes in alimentary tract of migrating blackcaps (Sylvia atricapilla): a comparison among fed, fasted, food-restricted, and refed birds. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 77, 48–54.
DOI Google Scholar

Kotrschal, A., Corral-Lopez, A., Amcoff, M., Kolm, N., 2014. A larger brain confers a benefit in a spatial mate search learning task in male guppies. Behav. Ecol. 26, 527–532.
DOI Google Scholar

Lemaître, J.F., Ramm, S.A., Barton, R.A., Stockley, P., 2009. Sperm competition and brain size evolution in mammals. J. Evol. Biol. 22, 2215–2221.
DOI Google Scholar

Li, S., Gao, H., Liu, J., Li, C., Li, G., Li, D., 2022. Life history variation between two Eurasian tree sparrow Passer montanus populations at different altitudes. Anim. Biol. Leiden 72, 1–10.
DOI Google Scholar

Li, S., Lu, X., 2012. Breeding biology of Rock Sparrows Petronia petronia in the Tibetan plateau, with special reference to life history variation across altitudes. Acta Ornithol. 47, 19–25.
DOI Google Scholar

Liao, W.B., Jiang, Y., Li, D.Y., Jin, L., Zhong, M.J., Qi, Y., et al., 2022. Cognition contra camouflage: how the brain mediates predator-driven crypsis evolution. Sci. Adv. 8, eabq1878.
DOI Google Scholar

Liao, W.B., Lou, S.L., Zeng, Y., Kotrschal, A., 2016. Large brains, small guts: the expensive tissue hypothesis supported in anurans. Am. Nat. 188, 693–700.
DOI Google Scholar

Liu, Y., Wu, Z., Liao, W., 2023. Large-brained birds display lower extra-pair paternity. Integr. Zool. 18, 278–288.
DOI Google Scholar

Lislevand, T., Figuerola, J., Székely, T., 2007. Avian body sizes in relation to fecundity, mating system, display behavior, and resource sharing. Ecology 88, 1605.
DOI Google Scholar

Martin, R., 1981. Relative brain size and basal metabolic rate in terrestrial vertebrates. Nature 293, 57–60.
DOI Google Scholar

Martin, R.D., 1996. Scaling of the mammalian brain: the maternal energy hypothesis. News Physiol. Sci. 11, 149–156.
DOI Google Scholar

Minias, P., Podlaszczuk, P., 2017. Longevity is associated with relative brain size in birds. Ecol. Evol. 7, 3558–3566.
DOI Google Scholar

Mink, J.W., Blumenschine, R.J., Adams, D.B., 1981. Ratio of central nervous system to body metabolism in vertebrates: its constancy and functional basis. Am. J. Physiol. 241, 203–212.
DOI Google Scholar

Niven, J.E., Laughlin, S.B., 2008. Energy limitation as a selective pressure on the evolution of sensory systems. J. Exp. Biol. 211, 1792–1804.
DOI Google Scholar
Orme, D., Freckleton, R.P., Thomas, G.H., Petzoldt, T., Fritz, S., Isaac, N., et al., 2013. Caper: comparative analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=caper.

Pan, S.K., Wang, D.P., Zhang, X.H., Zhan, X.J., 2023. Smarter birds, smaller eggs, and less parental care time. Zool. Res. 44, 98–100.
DOI Google Scholar

Pitnick, S., Jones, K.E., Wilkinson, G.S., 2006. Mating systems and brain size in bats. Proc. R. Soc. A B 273, 719–724.
DOI Google Scholar
R Core Team, 2021. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org.

Revell, L.J., 2012. Phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 217–223.
DOI Google Scholar
Roff, D.A., 2002. Life History Evolution. Sinauer, Sunderland MA.
DOI

Sayol, F., Downing, P.A., Iwaniuk, A.N., Maspons, J., Sol, D., 2018. Predictable evolution towards larger brains in birds colonizing oceanic islands. Nat. Commun. 9, 2820.
DOI Google Scholar

Sayol, F., Maspons, J., Lapiedra, O., Iwaniuk, A.N., Székely, T., Sol, D., 2016. Environmental variation and the evolution of large brains in birds. Nat. Commun. 7, 13971.
DOI Google Scholar

Schliep, K.P., 2011. phangorn: phylogenetic analysis in R. Bioinformatics 27, 592–593.
DOI Google Scholar

Smeele, S.Q., Conde, D.A., Baudisch, A., Bruslund, S., Iwaniuk, A., Staerk, J., et al., 2022. Coevolution of relative brain size and life expectancy in parrots. Proc. R. Soc. A B 289, 20212397.
DOI Google Scholar

Smeele, S.Q., 2022. Using relative brain size as predictor variable: Serious pitfalls and solutions. Ecol. Evol. 12, e9273.
DOI Google Scholar

Sol, D., 2009. Revisiting the cognitive buffer hypothesis for the evolution of large brains. Biol. Lett. 5, 130–133.
DOI Google Scholar
Striedter, G.F., 2005. Principles of Brain Evolution. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
DOI

Tacutu, R., Craig, T., Budovsky, A., Wuttke, D., Lehmann, G., Taranukha, D., et al., 2013. Human ageing genomic resources: integrated databases and tools for the biology and genetics of ageing. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 1027–1033.
DOI Google Scholar

Timmermans, S., Lefebvre, L., Boire, D., Basu, P., 2000. Relative size of the hyperstriatum ventrale is the best predictor of feeding innovation rate in birds. Brain Behav. Evol. 56, 196–203.
DOI Google Scholar

Tsuboi, M., Husby, A., Kotrschal, A., Hayward, A., Buechel, S.D., Zidar, J., et al., 2005. Comparative support for the expensive tissue hypothesis: big brains are correlated with smaller gut and greater parental investment in Lake Tanganyika cichlids. Evolution 69, 190–200.
DOI Google Scholar

Zhao, X., Che, X., Ning, T., Zou, F., 2023. Distribution of birds in the high-altitude area of Mount Everest. Integr. Zool. 18, 199–204.
DOI Google Scholar
Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements
Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 12 March 2023
Revised: 07 June 2023
Accepted: 15 June 2023
Published: 03 July 2023
Issue date: September 2023

Copyright

© 2023 The Authors.

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements

We thank Hao Gao, Dongfang Fang and Zhenhao Liu for their assistances in data compilation, and Dr. Karin Isler for the supplementary data in her paper. We also appreciate the improvements in English usage made by Dr. Becky Cramer.

Rights and permissions

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return