Journal Home > Volume 14 , Issue 2

Sperm competition has been studied in numerous species as a representative example of postcopulatory sexual selection, where sampling sperm from male is the most basic and important step. Sperm collection can be tricky in birds, however, because unlike mammals, the genitals of birds are generally latent in the cloacal region and their characteristics vary among species. Various methods to collect sperm from different birds have been tested, such as cloacal massage, feces collection, and electro-stimulation, but their applicability varies depending on species. In this study, we introduced the urodeum stimulation method (UroS method) to collect sperm from Cuculus cuckoos, such as the Common Cuckoo (C. canorus). These species are expected to have interesting patterns of pair bonding and sperm competition because of their unique breeding strategy called brood parasitism; however, it remains unexplored. In this study, we described the application of our new method to expel semen from male common cuckoos, measured the volume of semen collected, checked the presence of sperm in the semen sample, and finally estimated its success rate among 82 males. Samples were successfully collected from 76 cuckoos (approximately 93%) and the colors and volumes of the samples were very diverse. Sperm was present in 43 of these samples (57%), showing a sperm observation rate approximately twice as high as that of the conventional cloacal massage method. We believe that this novel method will contribute to a better understanding of postcopulatory sexual selection in avian brood parasites and facilitate the process of sperm collection and artificial insemination in other medium-sized birds.


menu
Abstract
Full text
Outline
About this article

A novel method to collect sperm from brood parasitic cuckoos: Urodeum stimulation (UroS) method

Show Author's information Heesoo Leea,bHae-Ni Kima,bJun-Seo Goa,bMyeong-Chan Chaa,bSeongho Yuna,bSue-Jeong Jina,bJin-Won Leea,b( )Jeong-Chil Yooa,b
Korea Institute of Ornithology, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, 02447, Republic of Korea
Department of Biology, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, 02447, Republic of Korea

Abstract

Sperm competition has been studied in numerous species as a representative example of postcopulatory sexual selection, where sampling sperm from male is the most basic and important step. Sperm collection can be tricky in birds, however, because unlike mammals, the genitals of birds are generally latent in the cloacal region and their characteristics vary among species. Various methods to collect sperm from different birds have been tested, such as cloacal massage, feces collection, and electro-stimulation, but their applicability varies depending on species. In this study, we introduced the urodeum stimulation method (UroS method) to collect sperm from Cuculus cuckoos, such as the Common Cuckoo (C. canorus). These species are expected to have interesting patterns of pair bonding and sperm competition because of their unique breeding strategy called brood parasitism; however, it remains unexplored. In this study, we described the application of our new method to expel semen from male common cuckoos, measured the volume of semen collected, checked the presence of sperm in the semen sample, and finally estimated its success rate among 82 males. Samples were successfully collected from 76 cuckoos (approximately 93%) and the colors and volumes of the samples were very diverse. Sperm was present in 43 of these samples (57%), showing a sperm observation rate approximately twice as high as that of the conventional cloacal massage method. We believe that this novel method will contribute to a better understanding of postcopulatory sexual selection in avian brood parasites and facilitate the process of sperm collection and artificial insemination in other medium-sized birds.

Keywords: Brood parasitism, Sexual selection, Semen collection, Cuculus cuckoos, Sperm competition

References(65)

Bae, G.W., Jin, S.J., Lee, J.W., Yoo, J.C., 2020. Sperm morphology of avian brood parasites: the common cuckoo Cuculus canorus and oriental cuckoo C. optatus. Kor. J. Ornithol. 27, 120–131. https://doi.org/10.30980/kjo.2020.12.27.2.120.

Balshine, S., 2012. Patterns of parental care in vertebrates. In: Royle, N.J., Smiseth, P.T., Kölliker, M. (Eds.), The Evolution of Parental Care. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 62–80.
DOI

Bennison, C., Hemmings, N., Brookes, L., Slate, J., Birkhead, T.R., 2016. Sperm morphology, adenosine triphosphate (ATP) concentration and swimming velocity: unexpected relationships in a passerine bird. Proc. R. Soc. B 283, 20161558. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.1558.

Birkhead, T.R., 1987. Sperm competition in birds. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2, 268–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(87)90033–4.

Birkhead, T.R., 1995. Sperm competition: evolutionary causes and consequences. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 7, 755–775. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD9950755.

Birkhead, T.R., Briskie, J.V., Møller, A.P., 1993. Male sperm reserves and copulation frequency in birds. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 32, 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00164040.

Birkhead, T.R., Montgomerie, R., 2020. Three decades of sperm competition in birds. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 375, 20200208. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0208.

Birkhead, T.R., Pellatt, E.J., Brekke, P., Yeates, R., Castillo-Juarez, H., 2005. Genetic effects on sperm design in the zebra finch. Nature 434, 383–387. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03374.

Blanco, J.M., Gee, G.F., Wildt, D.E., Donoghue, A.M., 2002. Producing progeny from endangered birds of prey: treatment of urine-contaminated semen and a novel intramagnal insemination approach. J. Zoo. Wildl. Med. 33, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1638/1042-7260(2002)033[0001:PPFEBO]2.0.CO;2.

Bolopo, D., Canestrari, D., Martínez, J.G., Roldan, M., Macías-Sanchez, E., Vila, M., et al., 2017. Flexible mating patterns in an obligate brood parasite. Ibis 159, 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12429.

Brennan, P.L.R., Prum, R.O., McCracken, K.G., Sorenson, M.D., Wilson, R.E., Birkhead, T.R., 2007. Coevolution of male and female genital morphology in waterfowl. PLoS. One 2, e418. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000418.

Briskie, J.V., 1992. Copulation patterns and sperm competition in the polygynandrous smith's longspur. Auk 109, 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/109.3.563.

Briskie, J.V., 1993. Anatomical adaptations to sperm competition in smith's longspurs and other polygynandrous passerines. Auk 110, 875–888. https://doi.org/10.2307/4088641.

Briskie, J.V., Montgomerie, R., 1992. Sperm size and sperm competition in birds. Proc. R. Soc. B 247, 89–95. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1992.0013.

Briskie, J.V., Montgomerie, R., Birkhead, T.R., 1997. The evolution of sperm size in birds. Evolution 51, 937–945. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb03674.x.

Burrows, W.H., Quinn, J.P., 1935. A method of obtaining spermatozoa from the domestic fowl. Poult. Sci. 14, 251–253. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0140251.

Calhim, S., Immler, S., Birkhead, T.R., 2007. Postcopulatory sexual selection is associated with reduced variation in sperm morphology. PLoS One 2, e413. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000413.

Carballo, L., Battistotti, A., Teltscher, K., Lierz, M., Bublat, A., Valcu, M., et al., 2019. Sperm morphology and evidence for sperm competition among parrots. J. Evol. Biol. 32, 856–867. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13487.

Cheng, F.P., Guo, T.J., Wu, J.T., Lin, T.E., Ursem, P.J., Colenbrander, B., et al., 2002. Annual variation in semen characteristics of pigeons (Columba livia). Poultry Sci. 81, 1050–1056. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.7.1050.

Craft, W.A., M'elroy, C.H., Penquite, R., 1926. The influence of certain feeds upon the production of spermatozoa by the domestic chicken. Poultry Sci. 5, 187–198. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0050187.

Della, V.A., Volker, S., Krautwald, M.E., 2011. Attempted semen collection using the massage technique in blue-fronted Amazon parrots (Amazona aestiva aestiva). J. Avian. Med. Surg. 25, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1647/2009-043.1

Frediani, M.H., Guida, F.J.V., Salgado, P.A.B., Goncalves, D.R., Blank, M.H., Novaes, G.A., et al., 2019. Semen collection by electro-stimulation in a variety of bird orders. Theriogenology 125, 140–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.10.023.

Froman, D.P., Feltmann, A.J., 1998. Sperm mobility: a quantitative trait of the domestic fowl (Gallus domesticus). Biol. Reprod. 58, 379–384. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod58.2.379.

Gee, G.F., Bertschinger, H., Donoghue, A.M., Blanco, J., Soley, J., 2004. Reproduction in nondomestic birds: physiology, semen collection, artificial insemination and cryopreservation. Avian. Biol. Res. 15, 47–101. https://doi.org/10.3184/147020604783637435.

Girndt, A., Cockburn, G., Sanchez-Tojar, A., Løvlie, H., Schroeder, J., 2017. Method matters: experimental evidence for shorter avian sperm in faecal compared to abdominal massage samples. PLoS One 12, e0182853. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182853.

Helfenstein, F., Szép, T., Nagy, Z., Kempenaers, B., Wagner, R.H., 2008. Between-male variation in sperm size, velocity and longevity in sand martins Riparia riparia. J. Avian. Biol. 39, 647–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-048X.2008.04450.x.

Hemberger, M.Y., Hospes, R., Bostedt, H., 2001. Semen collection, examination and spermiogram in ostriches. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 36, 241–243. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0531.2001.00305.x.

Humann-Guilleminot, S., Blévin, P., Azou-Barré, A., Yacouman, A., Gabrielsen, G.W., Chastel, O., et al., 2018. Sperm collection in Black-legged Kittiwakes and characterization of sperm velocity and morphology. Avain Res. 9, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-018-0117–6.

Immler, S., Birkhead, T.R., 2005. A non-invasive method for obtaining spermatozoa from birds. Ibis 147, 827–830. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919x.2005.00456.x.

Immler, S., Saint-Jalme, M., Lesobre, L., Sorci, G., Roman, Y., Birkhead, T.R., 2007. The evolution of sperm morphometry in pheasants. J. Evol. Biol. 20, 1008–1014. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01302.x.

Ivanov, E., 1913. Experience sur la fecondation artificielle des oiseaux. Comptes Rendus Biol. 75, 371.

King, A.S., 1981. Phallus. In: King, A.S., Mclelland, J. (Eds.), Form and Function in Birds. Academic Press, New York, p. 107.

Klasing, K.C., 1999. Avian gastrointestinal anatomy and physiology. J. Exot. Pet. Med. 8, 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1055-937X(99)80036-X

Kleven, O., Fossoy, F., Laskemoen, T., Robertson, R.J., Rudolfsen, G., Lifjeld, J.T., 2009. Comparative evidence for the evolution of sperm swimming speed by sperm competition and female sperm storage duration in passerine birds. Evolution 63, 2466–2473. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00725.x.

Lake, P.E., 1957. Fowl semen as collected by the massage method. J. Agric. Sci. 49, 120–126. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600034407.

Lee, J. -W., Kim, H. -N., Yoo, S., Yoo, J. -C., 2019. Common cuckoo females may escape male sexual harassment by color polymorphism. Sci. Rep. 9, 7515. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44024–6.

Lierz, M., Reinschmidt, M., Müller, H., Wink, M., Neumann, D., 2013. A novel method for semen collection and artificial insemination in large parrots (Psittaciformes). Sci. Rep. 3, 2066. https://https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02066.

Louis, K.S., Siegel, A.C., 2011. Cell viability analysis using trypan blue: manual and automated methods. In: Stoddart, M.J. (Ed.), Mammalian Cell Viability: Methods and Protocols. Springer, Berlin, pp. 7–12.
DOI

Lüpold, S., Calhim, S., Immler, S., Birkhead, T.R., 2009. Sperm morphology and sperm velocity in passerine birds. Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 1175–1181. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.1645.

Marchetti, K., Nakamura, H., Gibbs, H.L., 1998. Host-race formation in the common cuckoo. Science 282, 471–472. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.282.5388.471.

Mccarthy, E., Mcdiarmid, C.S., Hurley, L.L., Rowe, M., Griffith, S.C., 2021. Highly variable sperm morphology in the masked finch (Poephila personata) and other Estrildid finches. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 133, 1099–1109. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blab048.

McKinney, F., Evarts, S., 1998. Sexual coercion in waterfowl and other birds. Ornithol. Monogr. 49, 163–195. https://doi.org/10.2307/40166723.

Montgomerie, R., 2010. Sexual conflict and the intromittent organs of male birds. In: Leonard, J.L., Aguilar, A.C. (Eds.), The Evolution of Primary Sexual Characters in Animals. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 453–470.

Møller, A.P., Ninni, P., 1998. Sperm competition and sexual selection: a meta-analysis of paternity studies of birds. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 43, 345–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050501.

Nakamura, H., Miyazawa, Y., 1997. Movements, space use and social organization of radio-tracked common cuckoos during the breeding season in japan. Jpn. J. Ornithol. 46, 23–54. https://doi.org/10.3838/jjo.46.23.

Oliveira, C.A., Silva, R.M., Santos, M.M., Mahecha, G.A.B., 2004. Location of the ureteral openings in the cloacas of tinamous, some ratite birds, and crocodilians: a primitive character. J. Morphol. 260, 234–246. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.10217.

Owen, R.D., 1941. Artificial insemination of pigeons and doves. Poult. Sci. 20, 428–431. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0200428.

Parker, G.A., 1970. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol. Rev. 45, 525–567. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1970.tb01176.x.

Parker, G.A., 1984. Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating strategies. In: Smith, R.L. (Ed.), Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems. Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–60.
DOI

Payne, R.B., 1977. The ecology of brood parasitism in birds. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Systemat. 8, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.08.110177.000245

Pollock, C.G., Orosz, S.E., 2002. Avian reproductive anatomy, physiology and endocrinology. Vet. Clin. North. Am. Exot. Anim. Pract. 5, 441–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1094-9194(02)00010-5

Quay, W.B., 1984. Cloacal lavage of sperm: a technique for evaluation of reproductive activity. N. Am. Bird Bander 9, 2–7.

R Core Team, 2022. R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-Project.Org/. (Accessed 1 July 2022).

Salt, W.R., 1954. The structure of the cloacal protuberance of the vesper sparrow (Pooecetes gramineus) and certain other passerine birds. Auk 71, 64–73. https://doi.org/10.2307/4081516.

Samour, J.H., 2004. Semen collection, spermatozoa cryopreservation, and artificial insemination in nondomestic birds. J. Avian Med. Surg. 18, 219–223. https://doi.org/10.1647/2003–16.

Setioko, A.R., Hetzel, D.J.S., 1984. The effect of collection method and housing system on semen production and fertility of alabio drakes. Br. Poult. Sci. 25, 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668408454855.

Shanmugam, M., Rajkumar, U., Reddy, M.R., Rama Rao, S.V., 2012. Effect of age on semen quality in naked neck and dwarf chicken under tropical climatic conditions. Anim. Prod. Sci. 52, 964–968. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN12033.

Sontakke, S.D., Umapathy, G., Sivaram, V., Kholkute, S.D., Shivaji, S., 2004. Semen characteristics, cryopreservation, and successful artificial insemination in the Blue rock pigeon (Columba livia). Theriogenology. 62, 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2003.08.018.

Stockley, P., 1997. Sexual conflict resulting from adaptations to sperm competition. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12, 154–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01000–8.

Tuttle, E.M., Pruett-Jones, S., Webster, M.S., 1996. Cloacal protuberances and extreme sperm production in Australian fairy-wrens. Proc. R. Soc. B. 263, 1359–1364. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1996.0199.

Watanabe, M., 1957. An improved technique of the artificial insemination in ducks. J. Fac. Fish. Anim. Husb. 1, 363–370. http://doi.org/10.15027/39617.

Wink, M., Dyrcz, A., 1999. Mating systems in birds: a review of molecular studies. Acta Ornithol. 34, 91–109.

Wishart, G.J., Wilson, Y.I., 1999. Temperature-dependent inhibition of motility in spermatozoa from different avian species. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 57, 229–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(99)00065–2.

Wolfson, A., 1952. The cloacal protuberance: a means for determining breeding condition in live male passerines. J. Field Ornithol. 23, 159–165. https://doi.org/10.2307/4510381.

Yun, S., Kim, H., Moon, H.-K., Lee, J.-W., Yoo, J.-C., 2019. Home range overlap and its genetic correlates in an avian brood parasite, the lesser cuckoo Cuculus poliocephalus. J. Ethol. 37, 271–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-019-00598–2.

Publication history
Copyright
Acknowledgements
Rights and permissions

Publication history

Received: 14 December 2022
Revised: 07 February 2023
Accepted: 10 February 2023
Published: 12 February 2023
Issue date: June 2023

Copyright

© 2023 The Authors.

Acknowledgements

We thank Jisoo Han for helping us in the field and Geun-Won Bae for a useful comment. We are also grateful to Hye-Kyoung Moon for her valuable help in using a microscope. This research was financially supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by The Ministry of Education (NRF-2020R1I1A2063567), for which we are most grateful.

Rights and permissions

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Return